SOP Evidence Gap Auditor

The problem

Draft SOPs often contain vague steps, missing controls, and orphaned decision points that fail professional audits. Relying on LLMs to "clean up" drafts usually results in hallucinated procedures that don't reflect actual operational reality.

What it does

• Builds an evidence ledger with source IDs and locators for every material claim.
• Identifies missing actors, inputs, results, and evidence for every procedural step.
• Maps process coverage to detect logic loops and undefined exception handling.
• Generates a prioritized gap register and acceptance tests based strictly on source material.
• Distinguishes between verified facts, model inferences, and human-reserved decisions.

Why this beats prompting it yourself

Standard prompts tend to "smooth over" missing information to create a polished-looking document. This skill enforces a "no false completion" rule, explicitly surfacing conflicts and unknowns rather than padding them with generic text. It ensures every requirement is traceable to a specific source ID, preventing the drift common in manual editing.

Use cases

• Auditing internal procedure drafts for SOC2 or ISO compliance readiness.
• Hardening operational workflows before migrating them into a BPM tool.
• Identifying conflicting instructions across multiple legacy policy documents.
• Generating test cases for new business processes based on existing documentation.

Known limitations

This provides operational review only, not legal certification or regulatory advice. It requires source material to function and will not invent policy or system behaviors from scratch.