More screenshots

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    Sales Decline Diagnostic

    2

    Sales Decline Diagnostic is an evidence-based agent skill for businesses that know commercial performance has weakened but do not yet know why.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Sales Decline Diagnostic

    Sales Decline Diagnostic

    Example session with this skill installed

    now we are in the fashion industry, we own a fashion store. We've been facing a problem with sales, i will provide you with the internal store data that I need you to conduct an analysis based on.
    {The Link to the Inputs file:https://www.4shared.com/office/GO5MGe-yfa/Fashion_Store_Internal_Data.html}

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the sales decline diagnostic

    Sales Decline Diagnostic activated — beginning diagnostic workflow.

    The strongest preliminary diagnosis is a conversion problem, with inventory availability and the mobile buying experience as the leading internal causes. Higher prices and weaker customer experience may be compounding it. Advertising costs and economic pressure remain plausible contributors, but the evidence does not establish either as the dominant cause.

    This analysis uses your newly attached document and external research for the stated market: Egyptian women’s modest-fashion e-commerce, primarily urban middle- and upper-middle-income customers, during May–August 2026. Your internal figures are treated as supplied evidence, not independently audited.

    MetricMay 2026August 2026Change
    Revenue, reportedEGP 3.73MEGP 2.80M−24.9%
    Website sessions101,00094,000−6.9%
    Orders2,5051,758−29.8%
    Conversion rate2.48%1.87%−0.61 percentage points; −24.6% relative
    Average order valueEGP 1,490EGP 1,590+6.7%
    Top-20 SKU/size availability87%76%−11 percentage points
    Returning-customer order share30%23%−7 percentage points

    The store lost 747 monthly orders between May and August. Higher order value partially cushioned the revenue decline.

    Using orders ÷ sessions for unrounded conversion, a sequential calculation gives:

    Revenue bridgeCalculated impact
    May revenue reconstructed from orders × AOVEGP 3,732,450
    Change sessions to August level, holding May conversion and AOV−EGP 258,685
    Then change conversion to August level−EGP 854,345
    Then change AOV to August level+EGP 175,800
    August reconstructed revenueEGP 2,795,220

    This decomposition depends on the order of calculation. It identifies where revenue changed, not which business decisions caused it. It nevertheless makes clear that traffic loss alone cannot explain the deterioration.

    There are three qualifications

    Channel scope: The document says Shopify represents 78% of sales, yet website sessions, orders, AOV, and reported revenue reconcile almost exactly. Confirm whether the table covers Shopify alone or combines channels. Until then, this calculation applies provisionally to the table’s scope.
    Revenue definition: Confirm whether revenue represents placed orders or fulfilled sales after cancellations and refunds. Otherwise, COD failures could be counted twice when explaining the decline.
    Seasonality: May and August both have 31 days, but may differ commercially. August’s approximately 21.8% year-over-year revenue decline strengthens the evidence of deterioration, without fully controlling for product mix or seasonal timing.

    Structural data quality is adequate. Diagnostic readiness is adequate for prioritizing tests, limited for allocating losses to individual causes.

    Which explanations are supported

    Confidence below refers to causal attribution, rather than whether the reported change occurred.

    Expected benefits are less wasted traffic, clearer identification of purchase friction, and better targeting of recovery work. The available data cannot support a credible revenue-recovery or ROI forecast.

    The main implementation risks are overstocking weak variants, introducing checkout defects, and changing several factors simultaneously so their effects cannot be separated. Use limited exposure, rollback options, and explicit success measures.

    First-week sequence

    Days 1–2: Reconcile channel and revenue definitions; obtain daily funnel and stock records; correct documented ad-to-stock mismatches.
    Days 3–4: Validate checkout tracking and launch the controlled mobile test. Start customer and COD-failure analysis.
    Days 5–7: Review implementation quality and early evidence. Set the next decision date based on the test’s required sample size; one week may not be enough to establish an effect.

    Over the following month, retain improvements supported by completed and fulfilled purchases. Once availability and checkout are stable, test pricing or promotional changes on a limited set of products. Assess profitability after advertising, fulfillment, cancellations, and returns before increasing spend.

    The three highest-value data requests are

    Daily channel and funnel data: sessions, product views, cart additions, checkout starts, purchases, device, and deployment dates.
    SKU/size commercial history: availability, price, discount, product traffic, orders, and category revenue.
    Order and customer outcomes: customer ID, first/repeat purchase status, order and delivery dates, carrier, cancellation/refund reason, net revenue, and relevant costs.

    These could change the diagnosis materially. For example, stable conversion among available products would strengthen the stockout explanation; a failed controlled checkout test would weaken the redesign explanation; deterioration isolated to paid traffic would raise advertising quality as a priority.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Diagnose the root cause of declining conversion rates across sales channels.Distinguish between internal execution gaps and external market pressures.Analyze segment-level performance to isolate specific product or region failures.Test competing causal hypotheses before committing to a recovery strategy.

    About this skill

    Sales Decline Diagnostic is an evidence-based agent skill for businesses that know commercial performance has weakened but do not yet know why.

    Instead of jumping directly to generic growth advice, the skill guides the agent through a structured diagnostic process:

    identifies exactly what commercial metric deteriorated; checks whether the available data is reliable and comparable; applies the appropriate decomposition for e-commerce, SaaS/subscription, services, agencies, B2B pipelines, and multi-channel businesses; identifies where the decline is concentrated across products, channels, markets, customer groups, or other segments; evaluates internal drivers including acquisition, conversion, pricing, availability, retention, churn, and operations; resolves the correct customer market and diagnosis period before making external claims; researches relevant competitors, industry conditions, platform changes, regulation, and macroeconomic pressures when the host provides research tools; tests whether external conditions actually transmit into the business rather than merely mentioning market trends; separates verified facts, supported hypotheses, possible causes, weakened explanations, and unresolved evidence gaps; distinguishes whether the deterioration is primarily internal, external, mixed, or still uncertain; applies a decision gate before recommending material management action; produces decision-useful charts or structured visuals when comparable quantitative data supports them; falls back to chart-ready tables or structured evidence when visual rendering is unavailable.

    The skill also includes workflow-persistence controls for long conversations. During an active diagnosis, it performs a visible Workflow Compliance Check after every 15 relevant user messages—or earlier when scope changes, major evidence contradicts prior findings, the user requests a premature recommendation, or workflow drift is detected.

    The package includes structured orchestration, diagnostic references, business-model decomposition frameworks, market and external-research rules, evidence and causality standards, management decision rules, workflow-persistence controls, deterministic calculation helpers, worked examples, and evaluation cases.

    Best suited for

    E-commerce stores, SaaS companies, agencies, service businesses, local businesses, B2B sales teams, founders, operators, analysts, and managers investigating commercial underperformance.

    Not designed for

    Generic sales-growth brainstorming, copywriting, bookkeeping, ordinary forecasting, or cash-flow/profit problems where commercial performance itself has not deteriorated.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 13 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed13 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions