More screenshots
Works with the AI tools you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI+20 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok+17 agentsProcurement Operations Supplier Intelligence
Analyze supplier quotes, spend data, and contract terms using evidence-based procurement workflows.
$15
Procurement Operations Supplier Intelligence
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze these two quotes for 500 laptops. Dell: $1200/unit, 4-week lead, Net 30. HP: $1150/unit, 8-week lead, Net 60, $5k shipping fee. We need these by next month for a new office opening.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the procurement operations supplier
- Generated the document
I have analyzed the quotes from Dell and HP for the procurement of 500 laptops. The comparison focuses on total landed cost and delivery feasibility for your deadline.
Executive Procurement Brief
The requirement is for 500 units for a new office opening next month. While HP offers a lower unit price, Dell is the only supplier currently meeting the delivery deadline. HP's shipping costs and lead time offset its initial price advantage.
Quote Comparison Analysis
| Component | Dell (Supplier A) | HP (Supplier B) | Variance (HP vs Dell) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Price | $1,200.00 | $1,150.00 | -$50.00 |
| Quantity | 500 | 500 | - |
| Extended Subtotal | $600,000.00 | $575,000.00 | -$25,000.00 |
| Shipping/Freight | Included | $5,000.00 | +$5,000.00 |
| Total Landed Cost | $600,000.00 | $580,000.00 | -$20,000.00 |
| Payment Terms | Net 30 | Net 60 | +30 Days Liquidity |
| Lead Time | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | +4 Weeks Delay |
Supplier Intelligence & Risk
- Dell: Timeline aligns with the office opening (FACT). Standard payment terms.
HP: Delivery timeline (8 weeks) exceeds the "next month" requirement (FACT). This represents a CRITICAL RISK for the office opening schedule.
- Financial: HP is $20,000 (3.33%) cheaper in total landed cost and offers better cash flow terms (Net 60).
Procurement Decision
DECISION: APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS (DELL)
Approval is recommended for Dell due to the mission-critical delivery deadline. HP is rejected despite the $20k savings because the 8-week lead time fails the primary requirement.
Condition: Procurement must confirm Dell's stock availability in writing before PO issuance to ensure the 4-week lead time is guaranteed.
Next steps
- Send a written request to the Dell account manager to confirm 500 units are allocated for immediate dispatch.
- Draft the Purchase Order for $600,000.00 referencing quote #DELL-500.
- Notify the Office Operations team of the 4-week ETA to finalize the setup schedule.
procurement-operations-supplier-intellig.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
What you get
About this skill
The Problem
Procurement teams struggle with inconsistent vendor evaluations and hidden risks in supplier quotes. Manual comparison often leads to double-counted savings, missed contract deadlines, and decisions based on assumptions rather than hard evidence.
What It Does Normalizes and compares multi-supplier quotes across price, MOQ, lead times, and service levels. Analyzes transaction exports to identify price variances, maverick spend, and consolidation opportunities. Identifies contract risks including auto-renewal traps, price escalation clauses, and termination gaps. Builds negotiation leverage using historical spend data and a structured give/get matrix. Flags data gaps and evidence-backed risks to prevent uninformed approval decisions. Why This Beats Prompting It Yourself
Generic prompts often hallucinate supplier motivations or invent market data to satisfy a request. This skill enforces strict evidence-first logic, categorizing every claim as FACT, INFERENCE, or ASSUMPTION to ensure audit-ready reporting. It applies specialized procurement workflows that reconcile numerical integrity and prevent the double-counting of projected savings.
Use Cases Reviewing competing vendor quotes for a new software contract or hardware purchase. Preparing a negotiation strategy for an upcoming high-value contract renewal. Auditing quarterly spend data to find fragmentation and high-cost low-volume patterns. Evaluating supplier risk profiles during a vendor onboarding or annual review. Known Limitations
Requires structured input like RFQs, quotes, or CSV spend exports. It cannot perform real-time external market price lookups or verify supplier business licenses independently.
How to install
Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.
- 1
Download the ZIP
Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.
- 2
Unzip into your skills folder
Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.
- 3
Ask your agent to use it
Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.
Skills folder by agent
Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean today
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install