More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
DeepSeek
Muse+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIDeepSeekMuse
Dots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsProcurement Operations Supplier Intelligence
Analyze supplier quotes, spend data, and contract terms using evidence-based procurement workflows.
$15
Procurement Operations Supplier Intelligence
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze these two quotes for 500 laptops. Dell: $1200/unit, 4-week lead, Net 30. HP: $1150/unit, 8-week lead, Net 60, $5k shipping fee. We need these by next month for a new office opening.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the procurement operations supplier
I have analyzed the quotes from Dell and HP for the procurement of 500 laptops. The comparison focuses on total landed cost and delivery feasibility for your deadline.
Executive Procurement Brief
The requirement is for 500 units for a new office opening next month. While HP offers a lower unit price, Dell is the only supplier currently meeting the delivery deadline. HP's shipping costs and lead time offset its initial price advantage.
Quote Comparison Analysis
| Component | Dell (Supplier A) | HP (Supplier B) | Variance (HP vs Dell) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Price | $1,200.00 | $1,150.00 | -$50.00 |
| Quantity | 500 | 500 | - |
| Extended Subtotal | $600,000.00 | $575,000.00 | -$25,000.00 |
| Shipping/Freight | Included | $5,000.00 | +$5,000.00 |
| Total Landed Cost | $600,000.00 | $580,000.00 | -$20,000.00 |
| Payment Terms | Net 30 | Net 60 | +30 Days Liquidity |
| Lead Time | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | +4 Weeks Delay |
Supplier Intelligence & Risk
- Dell: Timeline aligns with the office opening (FACT). Standard payment terms.
HP: Delivery timeline (8 weeks) exceeds the "next month" requirement (FACT). This represents a CRITICAL RISK for the office opening schedule.
- Financial: HP is $20,000 (3.33%) cheaper in total landed cost and offers better cash flow terms (Net 60).
Procurement Decision
DECISION: APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS (DELL)
Approval is recommended for Dell due to the mission-critical delivery deadline. HP is rejected despite the $20k savings because the 8-week lead time fails the primary requirement.
Condition: Procurement must confirm Dell's stock availability in writing before PO issuance to ensure the 4-week lead time is guaranteed.
Next steps
- Send a written request to the Dell account manager to confirm 500 units are allocated for immediate dispatch.
- Draft the Purchase Order for $600,000.00 referencing quote #DELL-500.
- Notify the Office Operations team of the 4-week ETA to finalize the setup schedule.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The Problem
Procurement teams struggle with inconsistent vendor evaluations and hidden risks in supplier quotes. Manual comparison often leads to double-counted savings, missed contract deadlines, and decisions based on assumptions rather than hard evidence.
What It Does Normalizes and compares multi-supplier quotes across price, MOQ, lead times, and service levels. Analyzes transaction exports to identify price variances, maverick spend, and consolidation opportunities. Identifies contract risks including auto-renewal traps, price escalation clauses, and termination gaps. Builds negotiation leverage using historical spend data and a structured give/get matrix. Flags data gaps and evidence-backed risks to prevent uninformed approval decisions. Why This Beats Prompting It Yourself
Generic prompts often hallucinate supplier motivations or invent market data to satisfy a request. This skill enforces strict evidence-first logic, categorizing every claim as FACT, INFERENCE, or ASSUMPTION to ensure audit-ready reporting. It applies specialized procurement workflows that reconcile numerical integrity and prevent the double-counting of projected savings.
Use Cases Reviewing competing vendor quotes for a new software contract or hardware purchase. Preparing a negotiation strategy for an upcoming high-value contract renewal. Auditing quarterly spend data to find fragmentation and high-cost low-volume patterns. Evaluating supplier risk profiles during a vendor onboarding or annual review. Known Limitations
Requires structured input like RFQs, quotes, or CSV spend exports. It cannot perform real-time external market price lookups or verify supplier business licenses independently.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.
Requires input data like quotes or spend exports. Cannot perform live external web lookups for market pricing or verify supplier credentials in real-time.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected