How does this skill help me write better interview feedback?

This skill analyzes your raw interview notes to generate a structured scorecard draft, citing specific quotes for every claim and flagging 'missing_evidence' where notes are insufficient. It eliminates 'blank page syndrome' and ensures every piece of feedback is grounded in what the candidate actually said.

Will this skill automatically update my candidate's profile in my ATS?

No, this skill does not have write-access to your ATS or external networks. It generates a draft that you review, edit, and then manually paste into systems like Greenhouse, Lever, or Ashby, ensuring you maintain full control over the final submission.

Which AI agents or platforms are compatible with this scorecard drafter?

The skill is designed to be model-agnostic and works with leading AI agents (such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini) that support text-based skill integration. Simply paste your notes into your preferred agent interface to begin the drafting process.

What specific sections are included in the generated scorecard draft?

The skill provides a structured draft including a summary, competency ratings, strengths, concerns, and open questions. It intentionally leaves the final hire/reject recommendation as a 'stub' for you to complete, as it never makes automated hiring decisions.

How does the skill ensure it doesn't 'hallucinate' or invent candidate details?

Accuracy is maintained through a 'cited-only' approach; the skill is configured to never invent quotes or examples. If your notes don't support a specific competency, the skill will explicitly flag it as missing evidence rather than guessing.

Interview Feedback Scorecard Draft — Cited, Human Approve…

I have drafted the interview scorecard based on your notes. All sections require human approval, and I have flagged missing evidence for the CSS competency.

Interview Scorecard Draft

{
  "sections": [
    {
      "id": "overall_summary",
      "title": "Overall Summary",
      "draft": "Candidate demonstrated solid experience in React and state management but showed technical gaps in layout styling. They exhibited positive cultural alignment and curiosity.",
      "source_citations": ["3 yrs React", "used Redux", "Good culture fit", "curious"],
      "status": "present",
      "needs_human_approve": true,
      "flags": { "invent_quotes_risk": false, "hire_decision_risk": false }
    },
    {
      "id": "competency:technical_skills",
      "title": "Technical Skills",
      "draft": "Proficient in React and Redux state management. Identified weakness in CSS Grid implementation.",
      "source_citations": ["3 yrs React", "used Redux for state", "struggled with CSS Grid questions"],
      "status": "present",
      "needs_human_approve": true,
      "flags": { "stale_or_vague_risk": false }
    },
    {
      "id": "open_questions",
      "title": "Open Questions",
      "draft": "Need to probe further on frontend styling capabilities and modern CSS layouts.",
      "source_citations": ["struggled with CSS Grid questions"],
      "status": "present",
      "needs_human_approve": true,
      "flags": {}
    }
  ],
  "gaps": ["Backend experience not mentioned", "Testing methodology not discussed"],
  "safety": {
    "network": false,
    "ats_write": false,
    "invent_quotes": false,
    "action": "draft"
  },
  "notes_for_reviewer": "Review every section before pasting into your ATS. You must choose the final hire/reject outcome yourself."
}

Next steps

Review the source_citations to ensure the draft accurately reflects the candidate's statements.
Fill in the gaps section if you have additional context not included in your original notes.
Copy the relevant sections into your company's ATS (e.g., Greenhouse or Lever) and select your final recommendation.

About this skill

Paste post-interview notes and optional competency fields. Get a cited scorecard draft (summary, competencies, strengths, concerns, open questions, recommendation stub) with source quotes from your paste, or missing_evidence where support is missing. Every section is marked for human approve; you paste into Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby or Docs yourself. Never invents candidate quotes or examples, never decides hire/reject/level/comp, no ATS write, no network. Not legal or EEO advice. Built for US hiring managers, panelists and TA partners.

Frequently Asked Questions

Interview Feedback Scorecard Draft — Cited, Human Approve