Works with the AI tools you already use

    CClaude CodeCCursorCCodex CLIGGitHub CopilotGGemini CLI+17 more

    design learning experiences

    by Carl Badenhorst

    1

    A senior learning experience designer for architecting rigorous, evidence-based curricula and educational systems.

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    See it in action

    You say

    Review this draft for a 3-day coding bootcamp. It currently focuses on syntax lectures. I need to ensure students can actually debug a production incident by the end.

    Your agent does

    The current design confuses content coverage with performance capability. To move from syntax knowledge to debugging judgment, we must reframe the journey.

    Proposed Shift:

    1. Evidence: Students must resolve three tiered 'broken' environments without hints.
    2. Activity: Replace 2 hours of lectures with 'Live Refactoring' where students justify fix choices.
    3. Feedback: Implement a peer-review loop focused on error-trace logic rather than just 'working code'.

    Which debugging framework should we prioritize for the rubric?

    What you get

    Reframe content-heavy briefs into performance-oriented learning journeys.Design assessment architectures that provide valid evidence of capability.Audit existing course designs for cognitive friction and alignment gaps.Evaluate AI and technology integration for pedagogical and operational fit.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Instructional design often focuses on content delivery and completion rates rather than actual capability development. Developers and educators frequently struggle to move beyond generic templates to create rigorous, implementable learning systems that bridge the gap between "knowing about" and "doing."

    What it does

    • Diagnoses and reframes learning briefs to identify root performance problems over simple content needs.
    • Architects learning journeys that prioritize active sense-making, practice, and feedback loops.
    • Designs assessment strategies that produce credible, authentic evidence of learner capability.
    • Evaluates educational technology and AI integration based on pedagogical value and operational feasibility.
    • Translates high-level educational strategies into concrete specifications for facilitators and developers.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts result in decorative complexity and "content dumps" that ignore cognitive load and implementation risks. This skill acts as a senior partner, challenging weak assumptions and forcing explicit choices between pedagogical trade-offs that DIY prompts overlook.

    Use cases

    • Architecting a multi-week technical certification program with integrated assessments.
    • Auditing an existing workshop design to identify gaps in guidance and feedback mechanisms.
    • Developing an AI-supported learning strategy that preserves human judgment and authorship.
    • Creating implementable storyboards and design rationales for complex simulation-based training.

    Known limitations

    Requires the user to provide specific context regarding learners and constraints to avoid neutral, generalized outputs. It will not blindly follow instructions that result in poor learning outcomes.

    How to install

    Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Browse More Skills