board paper readiness checker

    1

    Audit board papers for decision clarity, evidence gaps, and governance readiness before submission.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    board paper readiness checker

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit this draft for the 'Project Phoenix' expansion. It proposes $2M for a new warehouse but doesn't list competitors or the specific IRR. Check if it's ready for the board.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the board paper readiness
    • Generated the document

    I have evaluated the draft for Project Phoenix. The paper is currently Not Ready for submission due to significant gaps in financial quantification and competitive analysis.

    Board Readiness Audit: Project Phoenix Expansion

    Verdict: Not Ready (Score: 4.2/10)

    Dimension Score Table

    DimensionScoreKey Finding
    Decision Clarity8Request for $2M is explicit.
    Evidence3Lacks IRR calculations and market data.
    Options2No alternatives provided; "Do Nothing" omitted.
    Costs6Upfront cost clear; ongoing OpEx is vague.
    Benefits5Qualitative benefits listed; missing ROI metrics.
    Risks4High-level risks listed without mitigation plans.
    Dependencies5Mentions IT integration but lacks timeline.
    Implementation4No resource allocation or named owners.
    Governance6Approval path defined; regulatory check missing.
    Ownership7Accountability sits with COO; explicit.

    Material Gaps & Unsupported Assertions

    ItemTypeImpactClassification
    Competitive LandscapeGapHigh - Board cannot assess market riskInfo Confirmation
    $2M Cost AssumptionAssertionHigh - No breakdown of construction vs. equipmentDrafting Fix
    IRR/NPV MetricsGapCritical - Required for capital allocationInfo Confirmation
    Mitigation for Supply ChainAssertionMedium - Strategy is mentioned but not detailedDrafting Fix

    Restructured Skeleton

    1. Executive Summary: State the $2M request and the core "Why Now".
    2. The Problem/Opportunity: Detail the warehouse capacity shortage.
    3. Strategic Options: Compare the $2M expansion against 3PL outsourcing and the Status Quo.
    4. Financial Analysis: Insert IRR, NPV, and 3-year OpEx projections.
    5. Risk & Mitigation: Table of Top 5 risks and specific response plans.
    6. Implementation Roadmap: Phased timeline with monthly milestones.
    7. Recommendation & Approval: Clear sign-off request for the COO.

    Next steps

    • Drafting: Use the new skeleton to move the cost assumptions into a structured table.
    • Information: Obtain the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) from the finance team.
    • Information: Research and cite at least two competitor expansion moves in the same region.

    board-paper-readiness-checker.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Audit board papers for material gaps in evidence or logical reasoning.Score internal proposals against professional governance standards.Restructure messy drafts into decision-focused executive summaries.Differentiate between simple editing tasks and missing critical information.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Board members often reject papers because the request is vague, data is missing, or risks are glossed over. Authors waste time on multiple revision cycles because they lack a systematic way to audit their work against governance standards.

    What it does

    • Evaluates drafts across ten critical dimensions including decision clarity, evidence, and risk mitigation.
    • Identifies material gaps where assertions lack data or external references.
    • Calculates a readiness score (0-10) to determine if a paper is fit for submission.
    • Generates a restructured skeleton that prioritizes decision-relevant content.
    • Separates simple drafting fixes from critical information that requires new data.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General LLMs tend to be too polite, often missing subtle logical gaps or unsupported claims. This skill applies a rigid diagnostic framework that forces accountability on costs, dependencies, and viable alternatives, ensuring you don't walk into a meeting with an indefensible proposal.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing internal investment proposals before they reach the executive committee.
    • Auditing strategic project updates for compliance with governance frameworks.
    • Restructuring rambling drafts into concise, decision-focused board submissions.
    • Identifying missing data points in business cases early in the drafting process.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 1 day ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed1 day ago

    Frequently Asked Questions