More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
DeepSeek
Muse+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIDeepSeekMuse
Dots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsB2B Supplier Due Diligence Procurement Analyst
Procurement analyst for supplier due diligence, quote comparison, risk assessment, and negotiation strategy.
$12
B2B Supplier Due Diligence Procurement Analyst
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze these two quotes for cloud hosting: Vendor A offers $5k/mo with 99.9% SLA and 12-month lock-in. Vendor B offers $5.5k/mo with 99.99% SLA, no lock-in, but a 5% annual price escalation clause.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the b2b supplier due
The evidence supports a
DECISION-READY WITH CONDITIONS status. Vendor B provides superior service levels and flexibility but introduces long-term cost volatility through escalation clauses.
RFP / Quote Comparison & Risk Analysis
| Criteria | Vendor A | Vendor B | Variance / Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Base Cost | $5,000 | $5,500 | Vendor B is 10% higher |
| Annual TCO (Year 1) | $60,000 | $66,000 | $6,000 premium for Vendor B |
| Service Level (SLA) | 99.9% (8.77h downtime/yr) | 99.99% (52.6m downtime/yr) | Vendor B offers ~8h more uptime |
| Contract Term | 12-month fixed | Month-to-month | Vendor B offers higher flexibility |
| Price Protection | Guaranteed for term | 5% annual escalation | Vendor B Year 2 cost: $69,300 |
Executive Procurement Diagnosis
Vendor A is the cost-leader for predictable workloads where 9 hours of annual downtime is acceptable. Vendor B is a premium resilience play. The primary risk is Vendor B's price escalation clause, which compounds TCO over a 36-month horizon, potentially negating the benefit of "no lock-in" due to high switching costs later.
Negotiation Strategy & Leverage
- Leverage Point: Use Vendor A’s fixed pricing to negotiate the removal of the 5% escalation clause from Vendor B.
- Levers: Offer Vendor B a 6-month commitment in exchange for a price match to Vendor A’s $5k/mo rate.
- BATNA: Reverting to Vendor A provides a stable $60k annual budget ceiling.
30/60/90-Day Procurement Roadmap
- Days 1–30: Request Vendor B’s full Service Level Agreement to verify credit penalties for SLA breaches.
- Days 31–60: Counter-offer Vendor B with a capped escalation clause (2% max) or fixed 24-month pricing.
Days 61–90: Finalize contract, ensuring exit-assistance clauses are included to protect "no lock-in" flexibility.
Next steps
- Upload the full SLA documents for both vendors to audit credit-back structures.
- Confirm if the workload is "mission-critical" (requiring 99.99%) or "business-standard" (99.9%).
- Define internal switching costs to see if Vendor B's "no lock-in" has actual commercial value.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Vague supplier marketing and incomplete vendor data lead to risky procurement decisions. It is difficult to compare fragmented quotes, identify hidden contract risks, and build defensible negotiation strategies without manual spreadsheet work.
What it does
Builds side-by-side vendor scorecards based on price, reliability, and financial stability.
Calculates Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by reconciling unit prices, volume breaks, and hidden fees.
Positions spend categories on a Kraljic matrix to determine if a supplier is a leverage, bottleneck, or strategic partner.
Extracts contract risks like auto-renewal traps, price escalation clauses, and weak SLAs.
Generates a 30/60/90-day procurement roadmap for cost savings and risk mitigation.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often hallucinate vendor capabilities or ignore missing data gaps. This skill enforces strict evidence verification, distinguishing between supplier claims and verified third-party data, ensuring you never base a six-figure contract on "inferred" health or safety scores.
Use cases
Comparing multiple RFP responses to select a primary and secondary vendor.
Reviewing a single supplier's contract and quote before a renewal negotiation.
Auditing category spend to identify concentration risk and diversification needs.
Assessing supply chain continuity risks for critical bottleneck components.
Known limitations
Public verification is only possible if connected research tools are active. Analysis is limited to user-supplied documents or accessible official registries
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.
Analysis depends on user-provided documentation or active web-search tools. Cannot verify non-public financial data or private litigation status without supplied evidence.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected