Works with the AI tools you already use
AI Answer Reality Checker
Audit AI answers for unsupported claims, hidden assumptions, false certainty, missing evidence, and what actually needs verification.
Secure checkout via Stripe
See it in action
You say
Audit this AI claim: 'The 2024 tax code for remote workers in Germany requires a flat 15% solidarity surcharge on all global income, regardless of residency status.'
Your agent does
What needs verification
- The '15% flat rate' for Solidarity Surcharge (standard is 5.5% of income tax, not 15% of income).
- Claim that it applies to 'all global income' regardless of residency.
Cost if wrong
High. Incorrect tax filings lead to legal penalties and financial loss.
What you get
About this skill
The problem
AI answers can sound confident, detailed, and complete even when important claims are unsupported, outdated, inferred, or simply wrong. Fluency can make weak information feel more trustworthy than it is.
What it does
- Separates factual claims from inference, interpretation, prediction, and recommendation.
- Flags unsupported specificity, hidden assumptions, missing context, and possible hallucination risk.
- Identifies claims that depend on current information and should be independently verified.
- Checks whether confidence matches the available evidence.
- Traces the cost if a weak claim is wrong, including financial, legal, health, relationship, or reputational consequences.
- Shows what new evidence would strengthen, weaken, or overturn the answer.
Why use this skill
General-purpose AI can produce persuasive answers faster than users can verify them. This skill is designed to slow that process down where it matters. It does not assume AI is wrong; it distinguishes what has earned confidence from what merely sounds convincing.
Use cases
- Checking a ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or other AI response before acting on it.
- Auditing business, career, legal, financial, technical, or health-related AI claims.
- Testing whether an AI relationship or workplace interpretation is evidence-based or overly validating.
- Finding which parts of a long AI answer actually need external verification.
- Comparing a revised AI response after the model has been challenged.
Known limitations
This skill can evaluate reasoning and claim quality from the information provided, but it cannot independently verify every external fact without access to appropriate sources. High-stakes medical, legal, financial, tax, immigration, or safety claims should still be checked with qualified sources or professionals.
How to install
Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean today
- 30-day refund guarantee
- One-time purchase, yours forever
- Secure checkout via Stripe
Frequently Asked Questions
Popular in AI Agents & LLM Ops
agentic-workflow
A risk-aware, evidence-based engineering lifecycle protocol for robust agentic task execution and safety.
designing-hybrid-context-layers
Architects the right retrieval strategy for every query — teaching your agent when to use RAG, a knowledge graph, or a temporal index instead of defaulting to vector search for everything.
truth-first
Eliminate hallucinations with an evidence-first verification framework for system state, configs, and file contents.
prompt-engineer
Professional prompt engineering patterns for building robust, secure, and production-ready LLM applications.