Whistleblowing Case Intake Builder

    1

    Structures raw whistleblowing reports into neutral intake records, risk screens, and evidence preservation plans.

    $6.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Whistleblowing Case Intake Builder

    Example session with this skill installed

    An anonymous portal message alleges a supervisor is asking for kickbacks from a specific vendor. One PDF invoice is attached. Prepare a restricted intake and evidence handoff.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the whistleblowing case intake

    I have processed the portal message into a structured whistleblowing intake pack. This record maintains a neutral stance and prioritizes evidence preservation and independent routing.

    Whistleblowing Case Intake Pack

    1. Intake Snapshot and Access Restrictions

    • Case ID: WB-2024-0089-A
    • Received: 2024-05-22 14:30 UTC via Anonymous Web Portal
    • Status: Anonymous (Identity not supplied)
    • Sensitivity: Restricted - High
    • Intended Circulation: Internal Audit Director, General Counsel

    2. Allegation Register

    Claim IDReporter statement / neutral summaryWhen / whereSource and knowledge basisStatus
    AL-01Supervisor allegedly requesting kickbacks from Vendor X.Date unspecified; Procurement Dept.Anonymous portal report.Unverified
    AL-02Specific invoice [ID: INV-990] is cited as evidence of irregular pricing.Current fiscal year.PDF Attachment.Reported

    3. Immediate Risk and Protective Action Screen

    • Risk: Potential destruction of digital procurement records.
    • Urgency: Medium.
    • Interim Action: IT to secure mailboxes and ERP logs for the Procurement Dept.
    • Escalation Route: Internal Audit.

    4. Evidence and Preservation Register

    Evidence IDSource/custodianRelated claimOriginal formatPreservation request
    EVD-01Portal AttachmentAL-02PDF / 2024-05-22Save to restricted vault; do not open on shared drive.
    EVD-02ERP SystemAL-01Digital DBPlace legal hold on Vendor X transaction history.

    5. Independence and Conflict Controls

    • Conflict Check: Named supervisor must not have access to this case file.
    • Routing: Route to the Integrity Committee via General Counsel to bypass the Procurement reporting line.

    6. Follow-up Questions

    1. Can the reporter provide approximate dates or specific project names associated with the requests?
    2. Were other staff members present when the requests were allegedly made?

    7. Reporter Acknowledgement Draft

    "We have received your report regarding procurement concerns. The information has been logged under reference WB-2024-0089-A and is being reviewed by the internal integrity team. We will communicate further updates through this secure portal."

    Next steps

    • Initiate the legal hold on ERP records immediately.
    • Submit the Independence and Conflict control plan to the Head of Compliance for approval.
    • Post the neutral acknowledgement to the portal.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Handling sensitive whistleblowing disclosures is a high-stakes process where poor intake creates legal liability and reporter risk. This skill converts raw hotline notes, interview accounts, or draft case files into structured, defensible intake records and investigation handoff packs. It ensures allegations are captured neutrally, evidence is preserved, and conflicts of interest are identified before the file reaches decision-makers.

    What it does

    • Structure allegations by separating reporter statements into numbered, neutral claims with specific actors, conduct, and timing.
    • Triage risks using immediate-harm and retaliation screens to identify urgent safety or evidence preservation needs.
    • Map evidence through a dedicated register that tracks source provenance, custodians, and necessary preservation actions.
    • Check independence by identifying potential conflicts where named subjects might have supervisory or decision rights over the case.
    • Draft acknowledgements by providing trauma-informed, neutral receipts that manage reporter expectations without promising outcomes.

    How it works

    1. Input capture where you provide the reporter's account, incident details, and any available source documents.
    2. Analysis and extraction as the skill splits hearsay from direct observation and identifies missing factual gaps.
    3. Risk and conflict screening to determine the appropriate independent routing and urgency level.
    4. Pack generation resulting in a comprehensive, restricted-access handoff file for HR, Legal, or Internal Audit.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is designed for ethics, compliance, and internal audit professionals working within standard corporate governance and whistleblowing policy frameworks. It functions as a logic layer for case management systems and manual triage workflows.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often fail to maintain neutrality, frequently recasting allegations as facts or accidentally promising anonymity that can't be guaranteed. This skill enforces strict anti-patterns to prevent "guilty" labeling, protects reporter identity via restricted routing logic, and ensures preservation steps are never overlooked.

    Use cases

    • Hotline triage to turn raw phone transcripts into professional case records for HR review.
    • Independence audits to check if an existing intake note was handled by someone with a conflict of interest.
    • Evidence planning to generate specific preservation requests for IT and Finance before data is overwritten.
    • Safe handoffs to prepare a restricted briefing pack when allegations involve senior leadership.

    Known limitations

    Does not make legal eligibility findings or witness credibility rulings. Cannot guarantee anonymity if the reporting channel lacks technical privacy controls. Jurisdictional compliance requires human review.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.

    Does not determine legal status or witness credibility. Cannot guarantee anonymity where channels are not secure. Requires qualified human review for local law and safeguarding obligations.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 9 days ago

    Permissions

    Read Files
    Write Files
    Listed9 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The skill uses a structured logic layer to separate raw reporter statements into neutral, numbered claims while identifying immediate risks, conflict-of-interest triggers, and evidence preservation needs for investigators.

    The skill is designed as a modular logic layer compatible with most major LLMs and can be integrated into existing case management workflows or manual triage processes via standard AI agent platforms.

    You receive the full skill configuration, including the structured logic for intake mapping, risk screening templates, trauma-informed response drafts, and a guide for integration into your compliance workflow.

    Setup is straightforward; once imported into your agent environment, you simply need to define your internal routing protocols and any specific jurisdictional headers required by your legal department.

    While the skill identifies potential conflicts and preserves evidence, it does not make final legal eligibility findings or witness credibility rulings, as these require human professional judgment.

    Purchasers receive access to all future version updates, ensuring the intake logic remains aligned with evolving global best practices in corporate governance and reporter protection.

    New in Business & Operations