More screenshots

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner

    1

    Audit websites and landing pages for conversion friction, then turn findings into a prioritized, implementation-ready improvement plan.

    $9.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner

    Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit My SaaS Landing Page

    Use the Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner skill to audit the following SaaS landing page information.

    Hero headline

    Powerful Tools for Modern Businesses

    Supporting text

    Everything you need to manage your business better.

    Primary CTA

    Learn More

    Available page sections

    • Three customer testimonials
    • Pricing section
    • FAQ section
    • Contact form
    • Product features section

    I want to know

    1. What is hurting conversion?
    2. Which problems should I fix first?
    3. What should the hero section say instead?
    4. What should I change about the CTA?
    5. What should I improve across the rest of the page?

    Give me a structured audit with evidence, impact, confidence, effort, priority scores, recommended fixes, and a 7-day improvement plan.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the website conversion audit
    • Generated the document

    Website Conversion Audit

    1. Audit Context

    Page type: SaaS landing page

    Primary conversion goal: Not explicitly provided. The audit therefore treats the primary CTA as the provisional conversion action.

    Audience: Not explicitly defined.

    Inputs reviewed: Supplied landing-page copy and section information.

    Evidence limitation: Visual layout, actual navigation, mobile behavior, analytics, form implementation, and real visitor behavior were not provided.


    2. Executive Summary

    The supplied landing page has several conversion-friction issues that should be addressed before focusing on visual refinements.

    Highest-priority findings

    1. The hero headline is too generic to immediately explain the product.
    2. The supporting statement does not communicate a specific customer outcome.
    3. The "Learn More" CTA does not clearly communicate the desired action.
    4. The page contains trust elements, but the quality and specificity of the testimonials cannot be verified from the supplied information.
    5. The offer and objection-handling structure require additional clarification.
    6. Mobile and interaction-specific UX cannot be verified from the supplied information.

    3. Conversion Health Assessment

    CategoryAssessment
    Message clarityWeak
    Offer clarityPartially assessable
    CTA/action pathWeak
    Trust/proofPartially assessable
    UX/frictionNot fully assessable
    Objection handlingPartially assessable
    Copy consistencyMixed
    Mobile conversionUnknown

    Overall assessment: Provisional.

    There is not enough evidence to responsibly calculate a reliable 0–100 conversion health score. Missing information is not treated as a zero.


    4. Critical Findings

    Finding 1 — Generic Hero Headline

    Issue: The hero headline does not clearly communicate the product, target customer, problem, or outcome.

    Evidence:

    "Powerful Tools for Modern Businesses"

    Evidence type: Observed

    Why it matters:

    A visitor should be able to understand the page's relevance quickly. Generic language requires visitors to spend additional effort determining what the product actually does.

    Impact: 5/5

    Confidence: 5/5

    Effort: 2/5

    Priority Score: 100

    Recommended Fix

    Replace the generic headline with a specific statement describing the product's primary customer outcome.

    Implementation Note

    Focus the headline on

    Target customer + problem/workflow + desired outcome

    Avoid unsupported claims such as "best," "number one," or invented performance statistics.

    Validation

    Test the revised headline against the current version and monitor engagement with the primary CTA and progression toward the conversion action.


    Finding 2 — Low-Specificity CTA

    Issue: The primary CTA does not communicate what the visitor will receive or what action they are taking.

    Evidence:

    "Learn More"

    Evidence type: Observed

    Why it matters:

    The visitor cannot determine from the CTA what will happen after clicking or why clicking is useful.

    Impact: 4/5

    Confidence: 5/5

    Effort: 1/5

    Priority Score: 100

    Recommended Fix

    Replace the generic CTA with an action-specific CTA aligned with the actual conversion goal.

    Potential examples, depending on the real offer:

    • Start Free Trial
    • Book a Demo
    • See How It Works
    • Get Started

    The final CTA should reflect the actual action available to the visitor.


    Finding 3 — Broad Supporting Statement

    Issue: The supporting statement communicates a broad benefit without explaining the specific problem solved.

    Evidence:

    "Everything you need to manage your business better."

    Evidence type: Observed

    Why it matters:

    The statement is broad enough to apply to many products and therefore provides limited differentiation or concrete value.

    Impact: 4/5

    Confidence: 5/5

    Effort: 2/5

    Priority Score: 80

    Recommended Fix

    Replace the broad statement with a specific explanation of:

    • Who the product is for
    • What workflow it improves
    • What problem it removes
    • What useful outcome the customer can achieve

    Finding 4 — Trust Signals Need Specificity

    Issue: The page reportedly contains three testimonials, but their actual wording and credibility cannot be evaluated.

    Evidence:

    Three customer testimonials were reported as present.

    Evidence type: Observed for presence; Unknown for quality.

    Why it matters:

    Generic praise is less informative than specific customer context, problem, experience, or outcome.

    Impact: 3/5

    Confidence: 3/5

    Effort: 2/5

    Priority Score: 36

    Recommended Fix

    Where truthful information is available, make testimonials more specific by including:

    • Customer role or relevant context
    • Problem they were solving
    • Experience using the product
    • Specific outcome or benefit

    Do not invent customer results or statistics.


    Finding 5 — Offer Clarity Requires More Information

    Issue: The page includes pricing and features, but the supplied information does not explain exactly what customers receive or how packages differ.

    Evidence type: Unknown / Partially assessable

    Impact: 4/5

    Confidence: 2/5

    Effort: 3/5

    Priority Score: 36

    Recommended Fix

    Make the offer easy to understand by clearly showing:

    • What is included
    • Who each package is for
    • Important differences
    • Pricing
    • Billing expectations
    • What happens after purchase or signup

    5. Full 14-Module Audit

    ModuleResult
    First-Impression TestWeak — generic hero messaging
    Value PropositionWeak — outcome is unclear
    Hero SectionNeeds improvement
    CTA FrictionHigh — "Learn More" is nonspecific
    Trust & CredibilityPartially assessable
    Social ProofPresent, quality unknown
    Offer ClarityPartially assessable
    Objection DetectionAdditional page content required
    UX FrictionNot fully assessable
    Lead/Form FrictionForm details not supplied
    Pricing PresentationPresent, but details unavailable
    Mobile ConversionUnknown
    Copy & Message ConsistencyNeeds review
    Conversion Fix PrioritizationCompleted below

    6. Prioritized Fix Backlog

    PriorityIssueScoreRecommended FixEffort
    1Generic hero headline100Rewrite around customer + problem + outcome2
    2Generic CTA100Use action-specific CTA1
    3Broad supporting statement80Explain specific value and outcome2
    4Testimonial specificity36Strengthen truthful customer context2
    5Offer clarity36Clarify inclusions and package differences3

    7. Before → After Recommendations

    Hero Headline

    Before

    Powerful Tools for Modern Businesses

    Recommended direction

    [Specific outcome] for [specific target customer]

    The exact replacement should be based on the actual product and audience because those facts were not supplied.

    Supporting Statement

    Before

    Everything you need to manage your business better.

    Recommended direction

    Manage [specific workflow/problem] in one place so [target customer] can [specific outcome].

    The missing product information should be supplied before creating a final factual version.

    CTA

    Before

    Learn More

    Recommended direction

    Use the CTA that matches the actual conversion action:

    Start Free Trial

    or

    Book a Demo

    or

    See How It Works

    Only use the option that accurately describes the available action.


    8. Implementation Notes

    Copy

    Make the hero specific and outcome-oriented.

    Design / UX

    Make the primary CTA visually and hierarchically clear, while ensuring the visitor has enough information and trust before being asked to act.

    Development

    Verify that CTA links lead directly to the intended next step and that the conversion path does not contain unnecessary steps.

    Analytics

    Track

    • Hero CTA clicks
    • Landing-page engagement
    • Progression to signup/contact
    • Form starts
    • Form completions
    • Conversion completion

    9. 7-Day Conversion Improvement Plan

    Day 1

    Rewrite the hero headline and supporting statement around the actual target customer and primary outcome.

    Day 2

    Replace the generic CTA with an action-specific CTA.

    Day 3

    Review testimonials and add specific customer context where truthful information is available.

    Day 4

    Clarify the offer, packages, inclusions, and customer expectations.

    Day 5

    Review FAQ content against the most important customer objections.

    Day 6

    Review the CTA journey from hero through final conversion action and check mobile behavior.

    Day 7

    Set up analytics and testing so changes can be evaluated using real visitor behavior.


    10. Validation Plan

    After implementing the changes

    1. Establish baseline conversion metrics.
    2. Track CTA engagement.
    3. Track progression through the conversion funnel.
    4. Review form abandonment where applicable.
    5. Run usability testing or customer interviews.
    6. A/B test major copy or CTA changes when sufficient traffic exists.
    7. Compare results against the original version.

    11. Quality-Control Check

    • No fabricated evidence: PASS
    • Observations separated from hypotheses: PASS
    • Unknown information clearly labeled: PASS
    • Unsupported conversion promises: NONE
    • Duplicate findings: NONE
    • Priority scores calculated: PASS
    • Recommendations actionable: PASS
    • Claims faithful to supplied information: PASS

    Final Assessment

    The most immediate improvement opportunity is to make the page's value proposition more specific.

    The current hero and CTA require visitors to interpret what the product does and what action they should take.

    The recommended changes should be treated as conversion hypotheses and validated using real visitor behavior rather than assumed to guarantee a specific uplift.

    website-conversion-audit-fix-planner.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Identify specific UX and messaging friction points on any landing page.Prioritize website fixes using a data-driven Impact x Confidence scoring model.Generate implementation-ready copy and design recommendations.Create a structured 7-day roadmap for improving site conversion rates.

    About this skill

    Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner

    Turn a website or landing page into a clear, prioritized conversion improvement plan.

    Website Conversion Audit & Fix Planner analyzes landing pages and websites for the problems that can create conversion friction — from unclear messaging and weak calls to action to missing trust signals, confusing offers, unanswered objections, form friction, and inconsistent copy.

    What It Audits

    The skill performs a structured audit across 14 areas:

    • First-Impression Test
    • Value Proposition
    • Hero Section
    • CTA Friction
    • Trust & Credibility
    • Social Proof
    • Offer Clarity
    • Objection Detection
    • UX Friction
    • Lead/Form Friction
    • Pricing Presentation
    • Mobile Conversion
    • Copy & Message Consistency
    • Conversion Fix Prioritization

    What You Get

    The resulting report includes:

    • Executive summary
    • Conversion health assessment
    • Critical findings
    • Full 14-module audit
    • Evidence behind important findings
    • Prioritized fix backlog
    • Impact, confidence, and effort assessments
    • Before → after recommendations where supported
    • Copy recommendations
    • Design and UX recommendations
    • Development implementation notes
    • 7-day conversion improvement plan
    • Validation and testing plan
    • Quality-control check

    Evidence-Based Auditing

    The skill separates findings into:

    Observed — directly visible in the supplied material.

    Inferred — a reasonable conversion hypothesis based on observed evidence.

    Unknown — something that cannot responsibly be determined without additional information, analytics, testing, or research.

    This prevents the audit from presenting guesses as facts.

    Flexible Inputs

    Use it with:

    • A website URL when the agent has browsing access
    • Screenshots
    • Pasted landing-page copy
    • HTML or exported page content
    • Analytics data supplied by the user
    • Multiple pages for cross-page consistency analysis

    If information cannot be verified, the skill clearly identifies the limitation instead of inventing an answer.

    Built for Action

    The goal is not to produce another generic website critique.

    The skill turns findings into a practical sequence of actions so users can see:

    What is wrong → Why it matters → How important it is → What to change → How to implement it → How to validate the change.

    The skill does not invent testimonials, statistics, customer results, credentials, guarantees, or other business claims.

    It also does not promise a specific increase in conversion rate, sales, leads, or revenue. Actual performance should be validated with analytics, user research, usability testing, A/B testing, or other appropriate measurement.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 11 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed11 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions