- Home
- Skills
- Business & Operations
- Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst
Objective vendor comparison and scorecard generator using weighted criteria and TCO analysis.
$11
Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst
Example session with this skill installed
Compare these two hosting providers. Vendor A: $500/mo, 99.9% uptime claim, free migration. Vendor B: $450/mo, $1000 setup fee, 99.99% SLA. Uptime is our #1 priority, price is #2.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the vendor evaluation selection
I have evaluated the hosting options based on your priority for uptime reliability followed by cost efficiency.
Vendor Evaluation: Hosting Infrastructure
Decision Scope: Selection of a primary hosting provider based on high-availability requirements and 12-month TCO.
Evaluation Criteria & Weights:
- Uptime Reliability (60%): Critical for service continuity.
- Total Cost (40%): Monthly fees and one-time setup costs.
Vendor Profiles:
Vendor A: Monthly cost of $500. Features a 99.9% uptime
CLAIM (unverified). Free migration included. No setup fee.
- Vendor B: Monthly cost of $450. $1,000 setup fee. Features a 99.99% SLA (legally backed commitment).
Scorecard:
| Criterion | Weight | Vendor A Score | Vendor B Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uptime Reliability | 60% | 7/10 (Claim only) | 10/10 (SLA backed) |
| Total Cost (Year 1) | 40% | 10/10 ($6,000) | 8/10 ($6,400) |
| Weighted Total | 100% | 8.2 | 9.2 |
Risk Assessment:
- Vendor A: High risk regarding reliability. A 99.9% "claim" without an SLA provides no recourse for downtime.
Vendor B: Low financial risk. The $1,000 setup fee makes Year 1 more expensive, but the cost gap narrows in Year 2.
Total Cost of Ownership (12 Months):
- Vendor A: $500 x 12 = $6,000 (FACT)
- Vendor B: ($450 x 12) + $1,000 = $6,400 (CALCULATED)
Recommendation:
- Top Choice: Vendor B
- Confidence: High
Reasoning: Despite a 6.6% higher TCO in the first year, Vendor B provides a 99.99% SLA. For a project where uptime is the top priority, the 0.09% difference in availability (approx. 8 hours/year) justifies the $400 premium.
- What would change it: If Vendor A can provide a contractually guaranteed 99.99% SLA at their current price point.
Next Steps
- Request the full Service Level Agreement (SLA) document from Vendor B to verify penalty credits.
- Ask Vendor A if they offer an uptime guarantee backed by financial credits rather than just a marketing claim.
- Confirm the migration timeline with Vendor A to see if "free" migration has hidden resource costs for your team.
Next steps
- Request the full SLA document from Vendor B to confirm penalty credits.
- Ask Vendor A for a formal uptime guarantee to see if they will back their claim.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Stop guessing which vendor to pick based on marketing glossies and gut feelings. This skill forces an evidence-based selection process by dismantling vendor proposals and quotes into a structured, weighted scorecard. It eliminates the ambiguity of "lowest price" by calculating Total Cost of Ownership and surfacing hidden contract risks.
What It Does Extracts Evidence — Categorizes data into Facts, Vendor Claims, Calculations, and Unknowns to prevent biased decision-making. Builds Weighted Scorecards — Compares vendors against your specific priorities, such as scalability, support, or integration depth. Calculates TCO — Normalizes pricing structures to show the real cost over 1–3 years, including setup and migration fees. Assesses Risk — Identifies single points of failure, vendor lock-in, and unverified claims that could derail implementation. Generates Recommendations — Provides a clear top choice with a confidence rating and identifies the specific data points that could change the result. How It Works Provide Context — Paste your vendor quotes, RFP responses, or feature lists and state your main priorities. Review Criteria — The analyst establishes evaluation weights based on your requirements. Analyze Options — It builds detailed profiles for each vendor and flags unverified claims as risks. Compare & Rank — Review the final scorecard and TCO breakdown to understand how each vendor compares. Frameworks & Tools
Uses structured evaluation methodologies for procurement, sourcing, and SaaS selection. Works with text-based vendor documentation, PDFs via OCR, and pasted spreadsheets.
Why This Beats Prompting It Yourself
Standard prompts often hallucinate vendor reputations or fail to distinguish between verified facts and marketing claims. This skill strictly labels evidence types and applies mathematical TCO calculations, helping ensure that hidden costs and contract risks are not overlooked.
Use Cases Comparing multiple SaaS platforms for a specific business need. Evaluating agency or contractor proposals for a project. Building a formal RFP shortlist for internal stakeholders. Deciding between technical service providers based on SLAs and pricing. Known Limitations
Cannot independently verify vendor claims or financial health if the relevant data is not provided in the input. Requires manual entry or pasting of vendor specifications, pricing, and other relevant documentation.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.
Cannot browse the live web to find current pricing or reviews. Requires the user to provide the vendor data, quotes, or specs to be evaluated.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected