Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst

    1

    Objective vendor comparison and scorecard generator using weighted criteria and TCO analysis.

    $11

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst

    Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst

    Example session with this skill installed

    Compare these two hosting providers. Vendor A: $500/mo, 99.9% uptime claim, free migration. Vendor B: $450/mo, $1000 setup fee, 99.99% SLA. Uptime is our #1 priority, price is #2.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the vendor evaluation selection

    I have evaluated the hosting options based on your priority for uptime reliability followed by cost efficiency.

    Vendor Evaluation: Hosting Infrastructure

    Decision Scope: Selection of a primary hosting provider based on high-availability requirements and 12-month TCO.

    Evaluation Criteria & Weights:

    1. Uptime Reliability (60%): Critical for service continuity.
    2. Total Cost (40%): Monthly fees and one-time setup costs.

    Vendor Profiles:

    Vendor A: Monthly cost of $500. Features a 99.9% uptime

    CLAIM (unverified). Free migration included. No setup fee.

    • Vendor B: Monthly cost of $450. $1,000 setup fee. Features a 99.99% SLA (legally backed commitment).

    Scorecard:

    CriterionWeightVendor A ScoreVendor B Score
    Uptime Reliability60%7/10 (Claim only)10/10 (SLA backed)
    Total Cost (Year 1)40%10/10 ($6,000)8/10 ($6,400)
    Weighted Total100%8.29.2

    Risk Assessment:

    • Vendor A: High risk regarding reliability. A 99.9% "claim" without an SLA provides no recourse for downtime.

    Vendor B: Low financial risk. The $1,000 setup fee makes Year 1 more expensive, but the cost gap narrows in Year 2.

    Total Cost of Ownership (12 Months):

    • Vendor A: $500 x 12 = $6,000 (FACT)
    • Vendor B: ($450 x 12) + $1,000 = $6,400 (CALCULATED)

    Recommendation:

    • Top Choice: Vendor B
    • Confidence: High

    Reasoning: Despite a 6.6% higher TCO in the first year, Vendor B provides a 99.99% SLA. For a project where uptime is the top priority, the 0.09% difference in availability (approx. 8 hours/year) justifies the $400 premium.

    • What would change it: If Vendor A can provide a contractually guaranteed 99.99% SLA at their current price point.

    Next Steps

    1. Request the full Service Level Agreement (SLA) document from Vendor B to verify penalty credits.
    2. Ask Vendor A if they offer an uptime guarantee backed by financial credits rather than just a marketing claim.
    3. Confirm the migration timeline with Vendor A to see if "free" migration has hidden resource costs for your team.

    Next steps

    • Request the full SLA document from Vendor B to confirm penalty credits.
    • Ask Vendor A for a formal uptime guarantee to see if they will back their claim.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Stop guessing which vendor to pick based on marketing glossies and gut feelings. This skill forces an evidence-based selection process by dismantling vendor proposals and quotes into a structured, weighted scorecard. It eliminates the ambiguity of "lowest price" by calculating Total Cost of Ownership and surfacing hidden contract risks.

    What It Does Extracts Evidence — Categorizes data into Facts, Vendor Claims, Calculations, and Unknowns to prevent biased decision-making. Builds Weighted Scorecards — Compares vendors against your specific priorities, such as scalability, support, or integration depth. Calculates TCO — Normalizes pricing structures to show the real cost over 1–3 years, including setup and migration fees. Assesses Risk — Identifies single points of failure, vendor lock-in, and unverified claims that could derail implementation. Generates Recommendations — Provides a clear top choice with a confidence rating and identifies the specific data points that could change the result. How It Works Provide Context — Paste your vendor quotes, RFP responses, or feature lists and state your main priorities. Review Criteria — The analyst establishes evaluation weights based on your requirements. Analyze Options — It builds detailed profiles for each vendor and flags unverified claims as risks. Compare & Rank — Review the final scorecard and TCO breakdown to understand how each vendor compares. Frameworks & Tools

    Uses structured evaluation methodologies for procurement, sourcing, and SaaS selection. Works with text-based vendor documentation, PDFs via OCR, and pasted spreadsheets.

    Why This Beats Prompting It Yourself

    Standard prompts often hallucinate vendor reputations or fail to distinguish between verified facts and marketing claims. This skill strictly labels evidence types and applies mathematical TCO calculations, helping ensure that hidden costs and contract risks are not overlooked.

    Use Cases Comparing multiple SaaS platforms for a specific business need. Evaluating agency or contractor proposals for a project. Building a formal RFP shortlist for internal stakeholders. Deciding between technical service providers based on SLAs and pricing. Known Limitations

    Cannot independently verify vendor claims or financial health if the relevant data is not provided in the input. Requires manual entry or pasting of vendor specifications, pricing, and other relevant documentation.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.

    Cannot browse the live web to find current pricing or reviews. Requires the user to provide the vendor data, quotes, or specs to be evaluated.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 1 month ago

    Permissions

    No special permissions declared or detected

    Listed1 month ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The analyst processes vendor quotes, RFP responses, and feature lists. It is designed to work with text-based documentation, spreadsheets, and PDFs to extract facts from marketing claims.

    This skill performs a multi-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis, factoring in hidden expenses like setup fees, migration costs, and variable scaling rates that a simple price comparison often misses.

    Yes, you can customize the evaluation weights. The skill allows you to prioritize specific criteria—such as security, scalability, or support—to ensure the final scorecard reflects your unique business requirements.

    You receive the specialized Vendor Evaluation Selection Analyst skill, pre-configured weighting frameworks, and structured output templates for generating professional scorecards and risk reports.

    The analyst identifies "Unknowns" and flags unverified marketing claims as risks. It assigns a confidence rating to its recommendation based on the completeness and quality of the data you provided.

    New in Business & Operations