Vendor Evaluation Decision Pack

The problem

Vendor comparisons often collapse into guesswork when data is missing or conflicting. Standard tools frequently "hallucinate" scores to fill gaps, creating risky deliverables that lack a clear audit trail.

What it does

• Builds an evidence ledger with source IDs and locators for every material claim.
• Identifies "hard gate" failures and separates explicit evidence from human-reserved decisions.
• Executes sensitivity and missing-evidence checks to show how gaps impact the final recommendation.
• Generates a decision package including a criteria dictionary, evidence matrix, and tailored demo questions.

Why this beats prompting it yourself

This skill enforces strict traceability and quality gates that prevent the LLM from inventing facts. It treats missing data as a primary output rather than a failure, ensuring your procurement decisions are based on verifiable evidence rather than model inference.

Use cases

• Compare SaaS platforms using raw RFP responses and security whitepapers.
• Audit existing vendor evaluations to find hidden biases or missing evidence.
• Generate structured demo questions based on specific vendor weaknesses or gaps.
• Produce auditable procurement reports for stakeholders that cite specific source rows.

Known limitations

Does not provide legal, financial, or security approval. Requires user-supplied source materials as it will not search the web or contact third parties.