UX Repository Taxonomy Architect

Turn scattered inputs into a review-ready UX Repository Taxonomy Architect.

Important work should not start with an ungrounded chat prompt. UX Repository Taxonomy Architect gives UX Research Operations Team a repeatable way to turn authorized source material into a structured decision pack: evidence is labeled, open questions remain visible, and every next step has an accountable human owner.

What you can produce

• Taxonomy blueprint
• controlled-vocabulary and tag rules
• artifact-to-tag mapping
• search and maintenance guidelines

The before-and-after

Before: Important context lives across notes, drafts, spreadsheets, messages, policies, or interviews. Teams debate what is known, what is assumed, and who needs to decide.

After: You have a shared, review-ready artifact centered on Taxonomy blueprint, with explicit inputs, trade-offs, missing evidence, and an approval-ready next step.

Why this skill earns a place in your workflow

It converts a buyer’s actual repository sample into explicit fields, controlled terms, ambiguity rules, and maintenance triggers rather than offering generic organization advice.

Use it when

• You need to convert buyer-provided context into a reusable operating artifact.
• You want assumptions, unknowns, and contradictory inputs surfaced before a team acts.
• You need one clear version of the work for cross-functional review and accountable approval.

How it works

1. Provide the authorized context, goal, constraints, and decision owner.
2. Run the workflow to build an evidence ledger, required deliverables, options, and open questions.
3. Review the output with the accountable human, verify claims, and decide whether to implement the next step.

Built for thoughtful teams, not autopilot

This is an instruction-only SKILL.md workflow. It does not log in, browse private systems, edit records, send messages, publish content, run commands, or execute transactions. It is designed to improve the quality and repeatability of team thinking—not to bypass ownership or professional judgment.

Known limitations

Use only buyer-supplied, authorized and appropriately redacted materials; provide recommendations for human approval without accessing systems, making decisions, or claiming compliance. Buyers must verify facts, follow their own policies, and obtain any specialist review required for their context. This skill does not provide legal, financial, privacy, compliance, security, accessibility, or safety determinations.