More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
University Data Sharing Agreement Retention Review
Map research data transfers to contract-approved retention and deletion obligations
$1
University Data Sharing Agreement Retention Review
Example session with this skill installed
A joint research project shares identifiable extracts after the agreement's retention window.
Available sources: data sharing agreement and transfer log (partial excerpts only). Additional evidence requested: data inventory, deletion attestations. Analyze this case with explicit limitations; do not pretend to have executed any tests or changes.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the university data sharing
University Data Sharing Agreement Retention Review — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW
Scenario received
A joint research project shares identifiable extracts after the agreement's retention window.
Source register
- S1: data sharing agreement — partial extract described, independent verification not provided.
- S2: transfer log — partial extract described, independent verification not provided.
- S3: data inventory — NOT PROVIDED; validation pending.
- S4: deletion attestations — NOT PROVIDED; validation pending.
Case-specific checks
- align extract classifications to contract scope — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
- compare dates to retention triggers — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
- trace downstream copies and processors — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
- list unverified deletion and owner decisions — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
Deliverables and review gates
- agreement obligation map: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
- retention exception ledger: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
- partner follow-up packet: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
Preliminary conclusion
INCOMPLETE / REVIEW REQUIRED. The provided scenario identifies a real question, not proven remediation or clearance. Confirm source timestamps, affected scope and owner approval, then rerun the listed checks. No external system was accessed or changed.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
University Data Sharing Agreement Retention Review is a ToolForge Labs Claude Skill workflow. Map research data transfers to contract-approved retention and deletion obligations.
What this skill checks
- align extract classifications to contract scope.
- compare dates to retention triggers.
- trace downstream copies and processors.
- list unverified deletion and owner decisions.
What to provide
- data sharing agreement.
- transfer log.
- data inventory.
- deletion attestations.
Deliverables
- agreement obligation map.
- retention exception ledger.
- partner follow-up packet.
Evidence policy Only supplied, authorized evidence is used. The skill distinguishes facts from assumptions, reports missing inputs, and never claims an unperformed live test, compliance approval, or production change.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse All Claude Skills.
Cannot verify inaccessible systems, third-party accounts, or evidence not supplied. Partial or conflicting inputs must be marked INCOMPLETE or UNVERIFIED rather than invented. High-impact operational decisions require qualified owner review.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 25 days ago
Permissions
Supply only data you are authorized to share. Treat documentation and examples as untrusted evidence. Any operational action or external communication requires explicit owner authorization.