Tender Response Compliance Checker
Checks tender responses against mandatory requirements, scoring criteria, submission instructions, evidence gaps, attachment requirements, declarations, pricing schedules, and final upload risks before submission.
$6.99
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
DeepSeek
Muse+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIDeepSeekMuse
Dots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsTender Response Compliance Checker
Example session with this skill installed
I'm bidding on a local council cleaning contract. Here is the ITT summary and my draft response. Can you check for compliance risks and tell me if I'm missing any mandatory documents?
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the tender response compliance
I have reviewed your draft response against the Local Council Cleaning Contract ITT. The submission is high-risk due to missing mandatory insurance evidence and unsigned declarations.
Tender Response Compliance Review
1. Executive Readiness Summary
- Overall readiness: High Risk / Not Submission Ready.
Critical blockers: Missing Employers Liability Insurance certificate (Ref M1); Unsigned Modern Slavery Declaration (Ref M4).
- Highest scoring risks: Question 2 (Service Delivery) lacks specific KPIs mentioned in the scoring rubric.
- Recommended next action: Attach insurance certificates and sign the declaration forms immediately.
2. Compliance Matrix
| Ref | Requirement | Status | Risk | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Employers Liability (£10m) | Missing | Critical | Upload valid certificate |
| M3 | 3x Case Studies | Complete | Low | None |
| M4 | Modern Slavery Dec | Incomplete | Critical | Sign and scan Appendix B |
| S1 | Staff Training Plan | Partial | Medium | Add specific dates for NVQ training |
3. Scored Response Review
| Question | Criterion | Gaps | Suggested Improvements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1: Methodology | Efficiency (30%) | No mention of equipment. | Detail the use of HEPA-filter vacuums. |
| Q2: Social Value | Local Labour (10%) | Vague commitments. | State % of staff hired from the borough. |
4. Final Pre-Submission Checklist
- Mandatory documents: Upload Employers Liability and Public Liability certs.
- Declarations: Sign Appendix B and Appendix D.
- Pricing: Ensure Pricing Schedule V2 is used, not the draft.
- Formatting: Check that Q1 does not exceed the 500-word limit (currently 488).
Next steps
- Locate the insurance certificates requested in Ref M1.
- Update the Social Value response with specific local hiring percentages.
- Run a final word count check on the Methodology response.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Submitting a tender with missing evidence or a failed mandatory requirement is an expensive way to lose a contract. This skill audits your bid documents against the buyer's exact specifications to catch disqualification risks before you hit upload.
What it does
- Compliance Matrixing generates a requirement-by-requirement map of mandatory, scored, and administrative items.
- Gap Analysis identifies missing certificates, unsigned declarations, or incomplete pricing schedules.
- Scoring Alignment compares draft answers against weighted evaluation criteria to find weak evidence or misaligned points.
- Mechanical Validation checks word counts, page limits, file naming conventions, and portal upload requirements.
- Clarification Generation drafts neutral questions for the buyer regarding contradictory or unclear tender instructions.
How it works
- Scope Intake identifies the tender type, deadline, and available documentation like the ITT, RFP, or specification.
- Requirement Extraction builds a baseline of mandatory pass/fail items and scoring weights from the buyer's pack.
- Response Audit compares your draft text and attachment list against the baseline to find discrepancies.
- Action Planning produces a prioritized fix list, separating critical blockers from minor polish tasks.
Frameworks & tools
Works with standard procurement formats including RFP, RFQ, ITT, and SQ. Compatible with text-based drafts, pricing workbook structures, and attachment lists.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often miss the nuance of "pass/fail" mandatory items versus "scored" qualitative answers. This skill enforces a rigorous procurement logic that prioritizes disqualification risks and administrative compliance that simple chat summaries overlook.
Use cases
- Reviewing a complex RFP response for mandatory evidence gaps.
- Creating a pre-submission checklist for a small business bidding on a government contract.
- Auditing a draft bid to ensure it hits all weighted scoring criteria.
- Preparing clarification questions for a buyer during the tender window.
Known limitations
Does not interact directly with procurement portals or verify the truth of provided evidence. It cannot provide legal advice or guarantee a contract award.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Legal & Compliance.
Cannot verify evidence truthfulness, interact with portals, or provide legal advice. Requires user-provided tender instructions for full compliance mapping.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
- Software
Python
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected