supplier quote comparison agent

    1

    Normalize and compare supplier quotations to reveal the true landed cost and commercial risks beyond the unit price.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    supplier quote comparison agent

    Example session with this skill installed

    Compare these two quotes for 1,000 units of wireless earbuds. Supplier A: $5.50/unit, EXW, 30% deposit, 20-day lead time. Supplier B: $6.10/unit, FOB, Net 30 terms, 35-day lead time. Destination: LA.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the supplier quote comparison

    I have analyzed the quotations from Supplier A and Supplier B for your 1,000-unit wireless earbud order. While Supplier A has a lower headline price, the EXW terms and deposit requirements create higher upfront risk and logistics complexity compared to Supplier B.

    Supplier Quote Comparison

    1. Inputs & Assumptions

    ItemValueStatus
    Quantity1,000 UnitsVerified
    DestinationLos Angeles, CAVerified
    Supplier A Unit Price$5.50 (EXW)Verified
    Supplier B Unit Price$6.10 (FOB)Verified
    Logistics Cost~$0.80-$1.20/unit for EXWHypothesis

    2. Commercial Analysis

    DimensionScore (0-5)EvidenceWhy It Matters
    Unit Price Basis3A is EXW; B is FOBFOB includes port delivery; A's price will rise after pickup.
    Payment Terms2A requires 30% deposit; B offers Net 30Supplier B assists your cash flow significantly.
    Lead Time4A: 20 days; B: 35 daysSupplier A is 43% faster, critical for stockouts.
    Freight Risk2Supplier A (EXW)Under EXW, you are liable from the factory floor.

    3. Key Risks / Gaps

    Logistics Delta: The $0.60 price gap between A and B may be entirely consumed by trucking and export handling costs for Supplier A's EXW quote.

    • Quality Assurance: Neither quote specifies the defect rate allowance or warranty process.
    • Import Duties: HTS codes are not provided, which could add 15-25% to the final landed cost.

    4. Recommended Next Move

    Primary Action: Request a DAP (Delivered at Place) quote from both suppliers to Los Angeles. This forces them to include all logistics costs, making the comparison definitive.

    Supporting Actions:

    1. Ask Supplier A for their defect replacement policy.
    2. Confirm if Supplier B's Net 30 terms apply to the first order or require a credit check.

    5. Validation Plan

    QuestionEvidence NeededCheapest TestPass Signal
    Real Landed CostForwarder QuoteSend EXW address to a 3PLLogistics < $0.60/unit
    Production QualitySample UnitOrder 5-unit air-express batchMeets tech specs

    Next steps

    • Contact a freight forwarder for a pickup quote from Supplier A's city.
    • Send the earbud spec sheet to both suppliers to confirm the HTS code.
    • Request a sample unit from Supplier A to verify the 20-day lead time claim.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Normalize Incoterms to compare EXW, FOB, and DDP quotes side-by-side.Identify hidden tooling and setup fees that inflate the initial order cost.Score suppliers based on payment terms, lead times, and warranty evidence.Calculate the true landed cost for international ecommerce shipments.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Headline unit prices are often deceptive. Procurement beginners and ecommerce sellers struggle to compare quotes when suppliers use different Incoterms, MOQs, and hidden tooling fees.

    What it does

    • Normalizes disparate supplier quotations into an apples-to-apples commercial comparison.
    • Deconstructs total cost of ownership by factoring in Incoterms, packaging, and setup charges.
    • Scores suppliers across eight dimensions including lead time, payment terms, and warranty handling.
    • Identifies high-impact uncertainties and proposes low-cost tests to verify supplier claims.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General-purpose models often hallucinate market data or fail to catch subtle differences in shipping responsibilities. This skill uses a rigorous evidence ledger to separate verified facts from hypotheses, ensuring you don't make a large financial commitment based on an assumption.

    Use cases

    • Comparing international factory quotes for a new private label product launch.
    • Normalizing domestic vs. overseas manufacturing bids for a hardware startup.
    • Evaluating bulk raw material suppliers with different minimum order quantities.
    • Audit of procurement options when freight costs or lead times fluctuate.

    Known limitations

    Does not provide legal, tax, or regulated professional advice. Requires user-provided quote data as it cannot log into private supplier portals or marketplaces.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 10 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed10 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions