Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+21 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsStrategic Partnership Due-Diligence Analyst
Analyze prospective business partners through evidence-based risk assessment, capability mapping, and weighted scoring.
$29.99
Strategic Partnership Due-Diligence Analyst
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze a partnership between CloudSync (Candidate A) and DataGuard (Candidate B) for a secure storage integration. Focus on commercial terms and API dependencies.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the strategic partnership due-diligence
The analysis of CloudSync and DataGuard for the secure storage integration is complete. The review identifies a critical dependency on DataGuard's proprietary encryption API and an ambiguity in the revenue-share model for renewals.
Strategic Partnership Due-Diligence Brief
Objective: Secure storage integration |
Analysis Date: 2023-10-27 |
Evidence Coverage: Medium (Website, API Docs, Draft Terms)
Partner Comparison
| Criterion | CloudSync (A) | DataGuard (B) | Evidence / confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Capability | Multi-cloud sync | AES-256 Encryption | High (API Docs) |
| Integration Maturity | RESTful Webhooks | Proprietary SDK | Medium (Docs) |
| Market Presence | SME Segment | Enterprise/Gov | High (Case Studies) |
Commercial & Incentive Analysis
CloudSync proposes a 15% referral fee for new leads. DataGuard requires a 24-month exclusivity period for the "Gold" tier. Lead ownership for cross-sells is currently undefined in the draft, creating a potential incentive conflict for account managers.
Risk Register
| Risk | Evidence / mechanism | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Owner / question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API Lock-in | DataGuard uses non-standard SDK | High | High | Define export path | CTO / Exit plan? |
| Margin Erosion | Fixed referral + rising storage cost | Medium | Medium | Tiered pricing | CFO / Margin floor? |
Weighted Scorecard
| Criterion | Weight | Rating | Evidence confidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic Fit | 20% | 4 | High | Strong segment overlap |
| Capability Fit | 15% | 5 | High | Complementary tech |
| Risk/Dependency | 10% | 2 | Medium | SDK dependency is high |
Calculated Score: 3.8 / 5.0 (Effective weight adjusted for 2 unknown criteria).
Next steps
- Request the specific API documentation for the encryption SDK exit-path.
- Clarify lead ownership terms for customers who downgrade then re-subscribe.
- Review the 24-month exclusivity clause with legal to ensure it doesn't block existing roadmaps.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Vetting a strategic partner requires moving past marketing decks to uncover operational dependencies and commercial friction. This skill provides a structured framework to audit potential partnerships, mapping complementary capabilities against hard risks like vendor lock-in and incentive misalignment.
What it does
- Partner profiling builds comparable dossiers on capabilities, market overlap, and reputation evidence.
- Capability mapping identifies specific contributions, ownership gaps, and single-party dependencies.
- Commercial auditing reviews revenue share, lead attribution, exclusivity terms, and margin impact.
- Risk registration flags operational, data, and exit risks with likelihood and impact ratings.
- Evidence-based scoring generates weighted scorecards (1-5) based only on verified data.
How it works
- Scope definition sets the business outcome, success metrics, and time horizon.
- Profile building extracts facts from websites, terms, and documentation to populate candidate profiles.
- Gap analysis maps overlaps and fallbacks to identify where the partnership is fragile.
- Brief generation delivers a full Due-Diligence Brief including a risk register and prioritized questions.
Frameworks & tools
This skill is framework-agnostic, designed for use with Claude, GPT-4, or other LLMs capable of processing long-form business documentation and contract terms.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often overlook structural risks like "dependency concentration" or "exit constraints." This skill enforces a strict evidence-only rule, ensuring that marketing claims are treated as claims rather than facts, and prevents "unknowns" from being scored as passes.
Use cases
- Compare two software vendors for a co-selling integration strategy.
- Audit a potential joint venture partner before signing a Letter of Intent.
- Evaluate a new distribution channel partner for commercial and data risks.
- Prepare a prioritized list of evidence requests for a second-round partner meeting.
Known limitations
Does not provide legal, tax, or financial certification. Requires manual input of partner documentation or authorized web access to function effectively.
Not a substitute for legal or financial counsel. Scores are qualitative judgments based on provided data, not statistical probabilities. Information gaps are marked as Unknown.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 20 days ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected