Works with the AI tools you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI+20 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok+17 agentsSources Sought RF(x) Response
Drafts compliant, page-limited RFI and Sources Sought responses with woven discriminators and government questions.
$19
Sources Sought RF(x) Response
Example session with this skill installed
Draft a 3-page RFI response for notice ID 12345-RFI. Company: Nexus Systems (Small Biz). Relevant work: Cloud migration for State Dept in 2022. Include 5 questions for the CO.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the sources sought rf
- Generated the document
I have drafted the RFI response for Nexus Systems based on Notice 12345-RFI. The draft is structured to fit within your 3-page budget (approx. 1,350 words) and includes placeholders for missing outcome metrics in your relevant work section.
RFI Response: Notice 12345-RFI
Offeror: Nexus Systems
Notice ID: 12345-RFI
Status: Market Research - Not an Offer
Budget: 3 Pages | Estimated: 2.8 Pages
Who We Are
Nexus Systems is a certified Small Business providing enterprise cloud migration services. We specialize in transitioning legacy federal architectures to secure, scalable cloud environments.
- UEI: [Buyer to supply]
- CAGE: [Buyer to supply]
- NAICS: [Buyer to supply]
Relevant Work
Project 1: Federal Agency Cloud Transition
- Customer Type: State Department
- Scope: Orchestrated the migration of legacy database clusters to a hybrid cloud environment.
- Outcome: [Buyer to supply specific metric, e.g., 30% reduction in latency]
- Date: 2022
Discriminator: Nexus utilized automated discovery tools to reduce transition downtime, a core capability verified during the State Dept engagement.
Questions to the Government
- Does the government anticipate this requirement being set aside for Small Business?
- Will the government provide a draft Statement of Work (SOW) prior to the formal RFP release?
- Is there a projected date for the site visit or industry day?
- Does the government require a specific security clearance level for key personnel at the time of proposal submission?
- Will the government consider a page limit extension for the technical volume in the final solicitation?
Open Items
- Identity: Please provide UEI, CAGE, and primary NAICS for the header.
- Relevant Work: Need a concrete outcome/metric for the 2022 State Dept project to finalize the card.
Next steps
- Fill in the UEI and CAGE placeholders in the "Who We Are" section.
- Add a specific outcome metric (e.g., cost savings or time reduced) to the State Dept card.
- Review the generated questions and select which to include in your final submission.
sources-sought-rf-x-response.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
What you get
About this skill
The problem
Writing capability statements for government RFIs and Sources Sought notices is a repetitive, high-stakes chore. Small teams often struggle to stay within strict page limits while ensuring all mandatory market research questions are answered without accidentally drafting a full technical proposal.
What it does
- Drafts concise 3-page capability responses based on government notice identifiers and buyer-supplied facts.
- Enforces a hard stop on page budgets by calculating word counts and table footprints during the outline phase.
- Validates past performance data, inserting explicit placeholders if required fields like scope or outcome are missing.
- Generates a strategic "Questions to Government" list to clarify scope, set-asides, and evaluation criteria.
- Identifies and weaves 3-5 verifiable discriminators directly into relevant work cards.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often hallucinate past performance metrics or ignore strict page caps, leading to non-compliant drafts. This skill uses a structured inventory process to map notice requests to specific buyer facts, ensuring no "shall" statement is missed while preventing the agent from inventing certifications or CAGE codes.
Use cases
- Responding to a SAM.gov Sources Sought notice to influence a small business set-aside.
- Drafting a market research response for a new NAICS code entry.
- Generating a list of clarification questions for a government contracting officer.
- Scaffolding a short RFI reply when technical staff are focused on full proposals.
Known limitations
This tool will not submit documents to portals or SAM.gov. It does not write full technical volumes, compliance matrices, or past performance cards.
How to install
Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.
- 1
Download the ZIP
Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.
- 2
Unzip into your skills folder
Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.
- 3
Ask your agent to use it
Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.
Skills folder by agent
Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 1 day ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install