More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Software Asset License True Up Exception Map

    1

    Trace software installation and entitlement records to identify license true up uncertainty.

    $1

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Software Asset License True Up Exception Map

    Software Asset License True Up Exception Map

    Example session with this skill installed

    A renewal invoice bills extra named users although inactive assignments were never retired.

    Available evidence: software entitlement purchases and endpoint installation inventory (partial extracts only). Additional sources requested: contract metric definitions and license assignment changes. Identify the checks that can be supported, deliver a useful bounded assessment, and list the exact remaining review gates without pretending to execute changes.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the software asset license

    Software Asset License True Up Exception Map — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW

    Scenario received

    A renewal invoice bills extra named users although inactive assignments were never retired.

    Evidence inventory

    • S1: software entitlement purchases — partial extract described by the requester; original full source not provided here.
    • S2: endpoint installation inventory — partial extract described by the requester; original full source not provided here.
    • S3: contract metric definitions — NOT PROVIDED; required to validate dependent findings.
    • S4: license assignment changes — NOT PROVIDED; required to validate dependent findings.

    Case-specific checks

    Normalize product edition and versions. INCOMPLETE until matching source anchors can be examined; document the observable facts, counterexamples and decision gate.
    2.

    Compare use metric to entitlements. INCOMPLETE until matching source anchors can be examined; document the observable facts, counterexamples and decision gate.
    3.

    Flag stale device assignments. INCOMPLETE until matching source anchors can be examined; document the observable facts, counterexamples and decision gate.
    4.

    Identify disputed contract measurement periods. INCOMPLETE until matching source anchors can be examined; document the observable facts, counterexamples and decision gate.

    Deliverables

    License consumption crosswalk. Create an evidence-linked section with observations, missing data, owner and next validation step.

    Unresolved entitlement queue. Create an evidence-linked section with observations, missing data, owner and next validation step.

    Vendor audit preparation brief. Create an evidence-linked section with observations, missing data, owner and next validation step.

    Acceptance gate

    No compliance conclusion is asserted without applicable licensing terms and verified usage records. Do not label this gate passed until supplied source records actually demonstrate it.

    Verdict and next action

    INCOMPLETE — evidence required. Request S3 and S4 from the authorized owner, reconcile them with S1 and S2, then repeat the four checks and log remaining conflicts. No production change, approval, communication, or test run is claimed.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Enterprise software renewals often fail due to mismatched installation data and purchase records. This skill traces software entitlement purchases against endpoint inventory to identify license true-up uncertainty and compliance gaps.

    What it does

    • Normalize product editions aligns varying version strings and editions across disparate inventory sources.
    • Entitlement comparison maps current usage metrics against purchased contract limits to find overages.
    • Stale assignment detection flags devices or users that are still assigned licenses despite inactivity.
    • Contract period validation identifies discrepancies in measurement windows and disputed renewal dates.

    How it works

    1. Supply data sources by providing entitlement purchases, installation inventory, and contract metric definitions.
    2. Review the source register to ensure all filenames and timestamps are correctly indexed as evidence (S1, S2, etc.).
    3. Execute the trace to move through the decision gates for normalization, comparison, and stale assignment flagging.
    4. Export the crosswalk and unresolved queue for human auditor review and final verification.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is designed for enterprise Software Asset Management (SAM) workflows. It processes structured data from CSVs, procurement logs, and endpoint management system exports.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard prompts often hallucinate compliance or fail to cite specific evidence for every claim. This skill enforces a strict source-to-evidence gate, ensuring no conclusion is asserted without a verified usage record or contract term.

    Use cases

    • Audit preparation to build a brief before a vendor-initiated compliance review.
    • Renewal optimization to identify unused seats that should be removed from a contract.
    • M&A due diligence to map software liability across newly acquired business units.
    • Quarterly true-up to reconcile monthly endpoint growth against annual enterprise agreements.

    Known limitations

    Does not perform automated billing, messaging, or live deployment changes. Requires qualified human review for all domain-sensitive outcomes and compliance conclusions.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Legal & Compliance.

    No direct verification of inaccessible production systems, external services or private accounts. Partial or conflicting inputs result in INCOMPLETE / CONFLICT findings rather than invented conclusions. Domain-sensitive decisions require qualified owner review.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 26 days ago

    Permissions

    Read Files

    Provide only materials you are authorized to share. Use a reviewed environment for proposed changes; keep deployment, production modifications, and third-party communication under explicit human approval.

    Listed26 days ago
    Updated9 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill automates the reconciliation of software installation data against purchase records to identify over-licensing, compliance gaps, and potential 'true-up' costs before a vendor audit.

    The skill is designed to work with any AI agent capable of processing structured data files, such as CSV or Excel exports, from common SAM tools and procurement systems.

    No complex installation is required; simply provide your entitlement logs and inventory reports to the agent, and the skill will guide you through the data indexing and tracing process.

    You receive the specialized skill logic, the 'source-to-evidence' workflow template, and a standardized reporting format for exporting compliance crosswalks.

    Yes, it is designed to normalize varying product edition names and version strings across disparate data sources to ensure your inventory matches your contract terms.

    While the skill identifies risks and gaps based on your data, a human auditor should always perform the final verification for domain-sensitive compliance conclusions.

    New in Legal & Compliance