rubric creator

    1

    Generates classroom-ready rubrics and grading frameworks in analytic, holistic, or checklist formats.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    rubric creator

    Example session with this skill installed

    Create an analytic rubric for a 10th-grade chemistry lab report on titration. Focus on data accuracy, procedure description, and safety. 50 points total.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the rubric creator
    • Generated the UI component

    I have generated a detailed analytic rubric for your 10th-grade Chemistry Titration Lab Report. The criteria focus on technical accuracy and safety, with a total value of 50 points.

    Chemistry Lab Report Rubric: Titration

    Course / Grade: 10th Grade Chemistry
    Assignment: Acid-Base Titration Lab Report
    Total Points: 50 | Weight: N/A


    Student-Facing Guide

    This rubric outlines the technical and safety standards required for your lab report. Before submitting, ensure your data tables are complete and your safety protocols are clearly documented.

    What is being evaluated:

    • The precision and accuracy of your recorded titration data.
    • The clarity and repeatability of your written procedure.
    • Adherence to lab safety protocols and waste disposal.
    • The calculation of molarity based on experimental results.

    Analytic Grading Grid

    CriterionExcellent (12-13 pts)Proficient (9-11 pts)Developing (6-8 pts)Beginning (0-5 pts)
    Data Accuracy (13 pts)All measurements recorded to the correct decimal place. Trial results are within 0.1mL of each other. Tables are clearly labeled with units.Measurements are recorded correctly. Trial results show slight variance (>0.2mL). Most units are present.Data is present but lacks precision. Units are missing or inconsistent across trials.Data is incomplete, missing, or shows impossible values for the equipment used.
    Procedure (12 pts)Steps are written in third-person passive voice. A peer could replicate the experiment exactly using only these instructions.Steps are clear and logical. 1-2 minor details (e.g., indicator drops) are missing, but the process is understandable.Procedure is written as a list of commands. Several key steps are missing or out of chronological order.Procedure is vague ("we did the lab") or missing entirely. Replicability is impossible.
    Safety & Waste (12 pts)Specific safety gear (goggles, aprons) mentioned. Detailed steps for neutralizing and disposing of acid/base waste are included.Safety gear is mentioned. Basic statement on cleanup is present but lacks specific disposal instructions.Mentions "being safe" generally. No specific mention of chemical-specific hazards or disposal methods.Safety section is missing or describes unsafe laboratory practices.
    Calculations (13 pts)Molarity calculations show every step, including unit conversions. Final answer matches the experimental data provided.Calculations are present and lead to the correct answer, but 1-2 intermediate steps or units are omitted.Calculations are present but contain a mathematical error that leads to an incorrect final molarity.No calculations are shown, or the math does not relate to the data collected in the lab.

    Scoring Summary

    CriterionPoints PossiblePoints Earned
    Data Accuracy13
    Procedure12
    Safety & Waste12
    Calculations13
    TOTAL50

    Next steps

    1. Review the "Calculations" column against your scratch paper to ensure all steps are visible.
    2. Cross-reference your "Procedure" section with your actual lab notes to ensure no steps were skipped.
    3. Use this as a checklist for your final peer-review session.

    rubric-creator.tsx

    TSX · React component

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Generate analytic grids for complex essays and research projects.Build single-point rubrics for growth-focused formative feedback.Create binary checklists for technical lab reports and math problem sets.Standardize grading criteria across different teachers or departments.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Designing consistent grading criteria takes hours and often results in vague language like "shows understanding" that confuses students. Manual rubric creation makes it difficult to maintain objective standards across large batches of assignments.

    Built with beginners in mind — describe the assignment and learning objectives, and this skill builds a detailed rubric with criteria, levels, and descriptors. No assessment design experience required. Experienced educators save time too: standards-aligned criteria and consistent scoring language on every rubric means fairer grading and clearer student expectations.

    What it does

    • Generates complete rubrics for essays, labs, presentations, and group projects based on specific learning objectives.
    • Produces output in four distinct formats: analytic grids, holistic descriptions, single-point proficiency standards, or binary checklists.
    • Writes parallel performance descriptors that use observable evidence instead of subjective modifiers.
    • Includes both teacher-facing scoring guides and student-friendly language to clarify expectations before submission.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General-purpose LLMs often produce inconsistent point totals or use non-parallel descriptors that make grading difficult. This skill enforces a structured evaluation framework, ensuring that each performance level is distinguishable and that point values are mathematically accurate.

    Use cases

    • Drafting analytic rubrics for high-stakes research papers or capstone projects.
    • Building quick checklists for formative assessments and weekly lab reports.
    • Creating single-point rubrics to provide growth-oriented feedback in creative writing workshops.

    Known limitations

    Requires the user to provide specific learning objectives and assignment types to generate useful criteria. Does not support automated LMS integration or direct gradebook syncing.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 12 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed12 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions