rfp compliance matrix builder
Converts RFPs into traceable compliance matrices with automated gap analysis and evidence mapping.
$5
Works with the AI tools you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI+20 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok+17 agentsrfp compliance matrix builder
Example session with this skill installed
Review the attached RFP text and company_facts.yaml. Build a compliance matrix, flag any SLA conflicts, and suggest a response priority plan.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the rfp compliance matrix
- Generated the document
I have analyzed the RFP against your approved company facts. I atomized 14 discrete obligations, identified one high-risk SLA conflict regarding uptime, and mapped 9 requirements to existing evidence.
RFP Compliance Analysis
| Source ID | Obligation / Requirement Text | Type | Mandatory | Response Action | Evidence ID | Accuracy Score | Flags | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFP-1.1 | Provide SOC2 Type II report for the current year. | certification | MUST | provide | EV-SEC-01 | full | - | ready | Tier 1 |
| RFP-2.4 | System must support OAuth2 and SAML 2.0. | capability | MUST | provide | EV-FEAT-09 | partial | partial | pending | Tier 2 |
| RFP-5.2 | Guarantee 99.99% monthly uptime. | sla | MUST | clarify | EV-OPS-04 | none | conflict | blocked | Tier 4 |
| RFP-6.1 | Describe implementation timeline (max 90 days). | question | SHOULD | provide | EV-OPS-12 | full | - | ready | Tier 1 |
Flagged Items Summary
- Partial: RFP-2.4 (Facts confirm SAML 2.0 support, but OAuth2 support is not explicitly stated in the facts file).
- Conflict: RFP-5.2 (RFP requires 99.99% uptime; company facts EV-OPS-04 strictly limits guarantees to 99.95%).
Review Required: RFP-5.2 (Requires Solution Architecture review to determine if 99.99% is technically achievable for this specific bid).
Clarification Sheet
| Source ID | Proposed Question | Suggested Answer | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFP-5.2 | "Our standard enterprise SLA provides 99.95% uptime. Will the agency accept this in lieu of 99.99%?" | "Confirm 99.95% uptime." | Direct conflict with approved operational facts. |
Response Priority Plan
- Tier 1 (Quick Wins): RFP-1.1, RFP-6.1 (Full evidence available).
- Tier 2 (Complex): RFP-2.4 (Requires verification of OAuth2 roadmap).
- Tier 4 (Blocked): RFP-5.2 (SLA conflict must be resolved before drafting).
Next steps
- Send the Clarification Sheet to the Procurement Officer regarding the uptime requirement.
- Verify OAuth2 support with the engineering team to move RFP-2.4 to "ready".
- Assign the Tier 1 items to the lead writer for immediate drafting.
rfp-compliance-matrix-builder.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
What you get
About this skill
The problem
Manual RFP analysis is prone to human error, missed requirements, and accidental misrepresentation of company capabilities. Teams struggle to track every sub-clause against verified evidence, leading to high-risk bids or costly compliance failures.
What it does
- Atomizes raw RFP documents into discrete, testable obligations with unique source IDs.
- Cross-references every requirement against a "single source of truth" company facts file.
- Categorizes obligations by type (SLA, pricing, certification) and mandatory status.
- Performs gap analysis to identify missing evidence, partial matches, and direct conflicts.
- Generates a prioritized response plan and a formal clarification sheet for ambiguous items.
Frameworks & tools
Accepts RFP text and structured fact files in Markdown, YAML, JSON, or CSV formats.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Basic prompting often leads to LLM "hallucinations" where the AI invents capabilities to please the user. This skill enforces a strict no-invention policy, requiring every claim to be mapped to a specific Evidence ID, ensuring 100% auditability and risk mitigation.
Use cases
- Building a traceability matrix for complex government or enterprise tenders.
- Identifying service level agreement (SLA) gaps before legal review.
- Automating the first pass of an RFP to filter for go/no-go decisions.
- Drafting neutral clarification questions for ambiguous technical requirements.
Known limitations
Requires a pre-existing, structured company facts file to serve as the source of truth. Cannot perform visual analysis of diagrams or complex pricing tables within PDF images.
How to install
Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.
- 1
Download the ZIP
Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.
- 2
Unzip into your skills folder
Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.
- 3
Ask your agent to use it
Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.
Skills folder by agent
Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 20 days ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install