Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    reviewer

    1

    A full pre-submission peer review that finds the weaknesses real reviewers will flag, before they do.

    $9

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    reviewer

    reviewer

    Example session with this skill installed

    Use reviewer to do a pre-submission review of my manuscript on few-shot object detection before I submit it.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the reviewer
    • Generated the document

    Reviewed the manuscript against 10 dimensions. Overall: revise before submitting. Two major weaknesses (experimental rigor, missing ablations) and three minor issues, with concrete fixes.

    Scorecard

    DimensionScoreNotes
    Novelty7/10Solid, but positioned against 2 missing baselines
    Clarity8/10Method section is clear; intro is dense
    Contribution significance7/10Impact understated in intro
    Methodological rigor5/10No significance testing; single seed reported
    Experimental validity5/10Missing cross-dataset generalization
    Threats to validity6/10Discussed but no mitigation plan
    Reproducibility7/10Code promised, no configs shown
    Figures and tables7/10Fig. 3 crowded; add a summary table
    References8/10Complete, 2 self-citations borderline
    Structure8/10Follows IMRaD

    Top 3 fixes (do these first)

    1. Add baselines: compare against the two strongest recent methods, since reviewers will ask.
    2. Add rigor: report the mean ± std over 5 seeds and a significance test (McNemar or paired t-test).
    3. Add a cross-dataset experiment to preempt the overfit-to-one-benchmark criticism.

    Likely reviewer concerns (and your answers)

    • Why not method X? Cite it and explain the fair-comparison rationale.
    • Results are marginal. Add effect sizes and the significance test above.

    Next steps

    • Apply the top 3 fixes, then re-run reviewer to confirm the score rises above 7/10 across the board.

    reviewer.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Identify technical gaps that lead to paper rejection before you submit.Prioritize revisions based on impact vs effort to meet tight deadlines.Anticipate hostile reviewer questions to prepare better rebuttals.Verify reproducibility standards for top-tier conference checklists.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Reviewers find the same weaknesses every time: weak baselines, missing ablations, unsupported claims, and unclear figures. Finding them yourself before submission is far cheaper than a rejection. This skill performs a comprehensive pre-submission review.

    What it does

    • Evaluates novelty, clarity, contribution significance, methodological rigor, and experimental validity.
    • Checks threats to validity, reproducibility, figure and table quality, and reference completeness.
    • Identifies the weaknesses real reviewers would flag and suggests concrete fixes.
    • Produces a scored report with a prioritized fix list.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General prompts return polite, vague feedback. This skill scores the paper across ten dimensions, separates critical from minor issues, and simulates the exact questions a reviewer will ask, with suggested answers.

    Use cases

    • Running a pre-submission review before submitting.
    • Preparing for resubmission after a rejection.
    • Doing a friendly internal review before sharing with collaborators.
    • Quality assurance before posting a preprint.

    Known limitations

    It is a pre-submission triage, not a substitute for real peer review. It works only with the draft you provide, and some judgments, such as novelty, remain partly subjective.

    Important

    It reviews and scores the manuscript; it does not rewrite it for you. Apply the fixes, then re-run it to confirm the score rises, as the final step of the Polish Pack.

    Why buy it

    Use it before submitting to anticipate and address reviewer concerns. It is the cheapest second opinion you can get and the final step of the Polish Pack.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 13 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed13 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions