Review Supplied Completion Criteria

    by Mariusz Wrzeszczynski

    1

    Review completion and sign-off criteria contained in files the user supplies or is authorized to share.

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    CClaude CodeCCursorCCodex CLIGGitHub CopilotGGemini CLIVVS CodeWWindsurfMManus+14 more

    See it in action

    You say

    I have a contract, a recent SOW amendment, and a test summary for the new API gateway. The summary says we passed, but I suspect the thresholds differ. Review these and check for gaps.

    Your agent does

    Decision: DOCUMENTED GAPS FOUND. The SOW amendment (v2.1) requires 99.9% uptime over 48 hours, but the test summary only reports a 12-hour window. Two Category A defects remain 'Open' in the punch list. Draft completion matrix prepared with 4 blocked items.

    What you get

    Identify version conflicts between original contracts and recent change orders.Generate a gap register of missing evidence required for final payment.Produce draft sign-off packages for human technical and financial reviewers.Reconcile punch lists and defect registers against acceptance criteria.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Project closure often stalls because completion criteria are buried across mismatched contracts, statements of work, and email threads. Humans struggle to reconcile inconsistent performance thresholds, missing test evidence, and unclear sign-off authority before final payment or handover.

    What it does

    • Extracts and decomposes completion criteria from supplied contracts, SOWs, and change orders.
    • Identifies documented conflicts between different source versions regarding scope, dates, and performance targets.
    • Generates a gap register highlighting missing evidence, unassigned owners, and unsupported closure claims.
    • Produces draft completion matrices and human validation plans to guide final sign-off.
    • Flag items reported as finished but lacking verifiable evidence in the provided materials.

    Frameworks & tools

    Works with PDF, text, and image exports of legal contracts, test protocols, punch lists, and project schedules. Use it with Read tools to process multi-document closure packages.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General prompts often hallucinate completion or miss subtle version conflicts between a 2022 contract and a 2024 change order. This skill enforces a strict evidence-based review logic that prevents premature sign-off by labeling unverified claims as Reported, not evidenced.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing supplier deliverables against multi-part statements of work.
    • Preparing implementation handover packages for operational teams.
    • Reconciling corrective-action reports with customer specifications.
    • Drafting completion matrices for milestone-based financial releases.

    Known limitations

    It cannot independently access ERP or CRM systems, inspect physical equipment, or execute live tests. It only analyzes the materials you supply or authorize it to read.

    How to install

    Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean today

    Listedtoday

    Creator

    Mariusz Wrzeszczynski
    Mariusz Wrzeszczynski

    159 skills on Agensi

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Popular in Business & Operations