- Home
- Skills
- Business & Operations
- Review Supplied Completion Criteria
More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Review Supplied Completion Criteria
Review completion and sign-off criteria contained in files the user supplies or is authorized to share.
$1
Review Supplied Completion Criteria
Example session with this skill installed
I have a contract, a recent SOW amendment, and a test summary for the new API gateway. The summary says we passed, but I suspect the thresholds differ. Review these and check for gaps.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the review supplied completion
Decision: DOCUMENTED GAPS FOUND. The SOW amendment (v2.1) requires 99.9% uptime over 48 hours, but the test summary only reports a 12-hour window. Two Category A defects remain 'Open' in the punch list. Draft completion matrix prepared with 4 blocked items.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Project closure often stalls because completion criteria are buried across mismatched contracts, statements of work, and email threads. Humans struggle to reconcile inconsistent performance thresholds, missing test evidence, and unclear sign-off authority before final payment or handover.
What it does
- Extracts and decomposes completion criteria from supplied contracts, SOWs, and change orders.
- Identifies documented conflicts between different source versions regarding scope, dates, and performance targets.
- Generates a gap register highlighting missing evidence, unassigned owners, and unsupported closure claims.
- Produces draft completion matrices and human validation plans to guide final sign-off.
- Flag items reported as finished but lacking verifiable evidence in the provided materials.
Frameworks & tools
Works with PDF, text, and image exports of legal contracts, test protocols, punch lists, and project schedules. Use it with Read tools to process multi-document closure packages.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
General prompts often hallucinate completion or miss subtle version conflicts between a 2022 contract and a 2024 change order. This skill enforces a strict evidence-based review logic that prevents premature sign-off by labeling unverified claims as Reported, not evidenced.
Use cases
- Reviewing supplier deliverables against multi-part statements of work.
- Preparing implementation handover packages for operational teams.
- Reconciling corrective-action reports with customer specifications.
- Drafting completion matrices for milestone-based financial releases.
Known limitations
It cannot independently access ERP or CRM systems, inspect physical equipment, or execute live tests. It only analyzes the materials you supply or authorize it to read.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.
Cannot verify live system states, inspect physical items, or sign certificates. Analysis is strictly limited to supplied documents and evidence.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 3 months ago
Permissions
Permissions are limited to the active local workspace and are used to inspect user-supplied or local workspace files. The skill package does not require bundled credentials, unrestricted external network access, or automatic production changes.