Works with the AI Agents you already use
Resume & Application Claim Audit Skill
Adversarially audit resumes and cover letters for integrity risks, vague metrics, and ATS alignment gaps.
$9.99
Resume & Application Claim Audit Skill
Example session with this skill installed
Audit my resume and the attached Senior DevOps Engineer job description. I claim I 'reduced cloud spend by 40%' but didn't provide the timeframe. Check for consistency with my cover letter.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the resume & application
I have audited your resume and cover letter against the Senior DevOps Engineer job description. The review identified one high-severity metric gap and two missing technical requirements.
Overall Verdict: REVISE
The audit identified a significant lack of context for a primary cost-saving claim and missing evidence for mandatory tools listed in the job description.
1. Critical Findings
- Severity: High
- Category: Metrics & Impact
- Quoted Claim: "Reduced cloud spend by 40%."
- Concern: Missing baseline, timeframe, and scope.
Clarification Needed: What was the starting spend, over what period was this achieved, and was this individual or team-led?
- Status: NOT ENOUGH CONTEXT
2. Metrics & Impact Audit
- Claim: "Managed 50+ Kubernetes clusters." Status: SUPPORTED BY PROVIDED EVIDENCE.
- Claim: "Reduced cloud spend by 40%." Status: AMBIGUOUS. Individual contribution is unclear.
3. Consistency Audit
- Resume: "Senior DevOps Engineer (2020 - Present)"
- Cover Letter: "Over three years of senior leadership..."
- Result: Plausible consistency; no material contradiction found.
4. ATS Alignment
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kubernetes | EVIDENCED | Managed 50+ clusters |
| Terraform | MISSING | No mention in resume |
| AWS Cost Explorer | MISSING | Claimed reduction but no tool cited |
| CI/CD Pipelines | EVIDENCED | Built Jenkins/GitHub Actions |
5. Evidence Needed Before Submission
- Define the measurement period for the 40% cost reduction.
- Explicitly state if Terraform was used, as it is a core requirement.
- Clarify if the "40%" refers to total cloud bill or a specific service.
6. Decision Summary
The verdict is REVISE because a major quantified achievement lacks the necessary context to be credible, and key technical requirements from the job description are not explicitly mapped to your experience.
Next steps
- Add the specific timeframe (e.g., "over 6 months") to the cloud spend bullet point.
- If you have Terraform experience, add it to the skills section to close the ATS gap.
- Distinguish if the 40% reduction was your specific architectural change or a team initiative.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Stop submitting resumes that trigger red flags or fail automated screenings. This skill acts as a skeptical pre-submission auditor for your resume and cover letter, identifying unsupported claims, vague impact statements, and internal inconsistencies. It functions as a professional integrity gate, not a writing service, ensuring your application stands up to scrutiny before a recruiter ever sees it.
What it does
- Claim extraction identifies every quantified metric, job title, date, and technical proficiency for inspection.
- Integrity testing classifies claims as supported, ambiguous, or overstated based on provided evidence.
- Vagueness detection flags weak phrases like "responsible for" that lack context on scale or outcome.
- Consistency checking compares dates and responsibilities across documents to find material contradictions.
- ATS mapping cross-references supplied job descriptions against your experience to identify truthful keyword gaps.
How it works
- Input documents by providing your resume, cover letter, and the target job description.
- Review findings categorized by severity, from low-level vagueness to critical integrity risks.
- Resolve gaps using the evidence list to clarify individual contributions or fix date mismatches.
Frameworks & tools
This skill is platform-agnostic and processes standard text, PDF exports, or Markdown resumes. It uses adversarial logic to simulate a skeptical hiring manager or an automated ATS filter.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often try to "improve" your writing by adding fluff or inventing achievements. This skill uses a strict audit framework that forbids fabrication, focusing exclusively on finding risks and verifying metrics to protect your professional reputation.
Use cases
- Executive transitions where high-scale revenue and growth claims require specific attribution.
- Technical roles needing precise mapping of tool proficiencies to job requirements without overstating expertise.
- Career changes to identify where transferable skills lack the evidence needed for a new industry.
Known limitations
Does not perform background checks or verify facts against external databases. Does not rewrite content or guarantee a specific ATS score.
Audit is limited to supplied text only. Cannot verify facts against external databases. Does not provide rewriting services or predictive ATS scoring.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 14 days ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected