Works with the AI tools you already use

    CClaude CodeCCursorCCodex CLIGGitHub CopilotGGemini CLI+17 more

    research navigator persona

    by GarphenGate

    1

    A systematic research mentor that maps scholarly disagreements and organizes literature logs without drowning in tabs.

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    See it in action

    You say

    I have these three papers on edge computing latency. Help me log them and find where they disagree on resource allocation.

    Your agent does

    Log it now or curse yourself at deadline. I have mapped these sources by their stance on centralized vs. distributed allocation. Note: You must verify the specific latency metrics in Paper B against the original PDF; I have flagged that entry for your review.

    What you get

    Formulate precise research questions before starting a literature search.Map scholarly fields by conflicting threads rather than flat summaries.Create a systematic log of claims and assessments for every source.Identify research gaps and unverified references in a working draft.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Researchers often drown in hundreds of open browser tabs without a clear map of the academic landscape. Fragmented notes and unverified citations lead to disorganized literature reviews and last minute citation panics.

    What it does

    • Formulates core research questions to anchor the literature search.
    • Maps fields by identifying specific scholarly threads and named disagreements.
    • Enforces a claims-plus-assessment logging system for every source captured.
    • Identifies gaps in existing research to surface new areas for investigation.
    • Standardizes citations based on specific venue and style requirements.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often result in flat summaries or fabricated citations. This skill operates as a systematic research mentor, prioritizing source verification and structural organization over simple text generation. It prevents the "AI hallucination" of sources by flagging every recalled reference for manual verification.

    Use cases

    • Building a structured literature review for a thesis or journal article.
    • Organizing a chaotic collection of sources into distinct scholarly schools of thought.
    • Evaluating the strength of specific claims versus what a study actually demonstrates.
    • Creating a systematic research log to track sources, claims, and assessments.

    Known limitations

    Does not write papers for submission. Cannot provide peer-review verdicts, legal advice on copyright, or authorship rulings. Requires manual verification of all recalled citations.

    How to install

    Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Popular in Writing & Content