More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Repair Git Submodule SHA Drift During Release Tag
Investigate release artifacts built with submodule commits different from locked references
$1
Repair Git Submodule SHA Drift During Release Tag
Example session with this skill installed
A release tag resolves to a different submodule SHA on an offline build agent.
Available evidence: Primary branch source records and Time-stamped compare evidence (partial extracts only). Additional sources requested: Policy / configuration governing release and Owner authorizations and historical change log. Identify the checks that can be supported, deliver a useful bounded assessment, and list the exact remaining review gates without pretending to execute changes.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the repair git submodule
Repair Git Submodule SHA Drift During Release Tag — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW
Scenario received
A release tag resolves to a different submodule SHA on an offline build agent.
Source register
- S1: Primary branch source records — partial extract described by requester; independently unverified.
- S2: Time-stamped compare evidence — partial extract described by requester; independently unverified.
- S3: Policy / configuration governing release — NOT PROVIDED; criteria and effective version unknown.
- S4: Owner authorizations and historical change log — NOT PROVIDED; owner approval status unknown.
Case-specific review checkpoints
Compare superproject gitlinks and submodule refs — NEEDS_VERIFICATION. Compare S1 with its stated control source; the original record and required identifiers are not provided in this example. Owner sign-off required before consequential remediation.
2.
Inspect checkout and recursive fetch flags — NEEDS_VERIFICATION. Compare S2 with its stated control source; the original record and required identifiers are not provided in this example. Owner sign-off required before consequential remediation.
3.
Correlate build provenance and cache contents — NEEDS_VERIFICATION. Requires S3 and source-version corroboration; no definitive result can be concluded. Owner sign-off required before consequential remediation.
4.
Define deterministic pin and verification steps — NEEDS_VERIFICATION. Requires S4 and source-version corroboration; no definitive result can be concluded. Owner sign-off required before consequential remediation.
Structured deliverables
Commit integrity map — proposed schema with source IDs, timestamps, conflicting observations, confidence and unresolved questions.
Build reproduction checklist — proposed schema with source IDs, timestamps, conflicting observations, confidence and unresolved questions.
Tag release hold criteria — proposed schema with source IDs, timestamps, conflicting observations, confidence and unresolved questions.
Decision matrix
- PASS: no checks proven PASS on current example evidence.
- NEEDS_VERIFICATION: all four checks, until source records are supplied.
- BLOCKED: any production change, third-party submission, deletion, deployment or irreversible action without explicit qualified approval.
Exact next evidence request
Provide complete timestamped extracts for Policy / configuration governing release and Owner authorizations and historical change log, source IDs for S1/S2, responsible owner and effective review window.
Boundaries and sign-off
The commit integrity map and build reproduction checklist are evidence-linked; any uncertainty remains explicitly unresolved until qualified review. No live system was accessed and no changes were performed. This is a synthetic demonstration, not an observed customer result.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Repair Git Submodule SHA Drift During Release Tag is a ToolForge Labs Cursor Skill workflow for technical evidence review. Investigate release artifacts built with submodule commits different from locked references.
What the skill checks
- Compare superproject gitlinks and submodule refs.
- Inspect checkout and recursive fetch flags.
- Correlate build provenance and cache contents.
- Define deterministic pin and verification steps.
Input evidence
- Primary branch source records.
- Time-stamped compare evidence.
- Policy / configuration governing release.
- Owner authorizations and historical change log.
Deliverables
- Commit integrity map.
- Build reproduction checklist.
- Tag release hold criteria.
Evidence policy Works from buyer-supplied sources only. Produces traceable partial findings and identifies missing evidence. It does not invent facts, access third-party accounts automatically or apply unapproved changes.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse All Claude Skills.
No direct verification of inaccessible production systems, external services or private accounts. Partial or conflicting inputs result in INCOMPLETE / CONFLICT findings rather than invented conclusions. Domain-sensitive decisions require qualified owner review.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 26 days ago
Permissions
Supply only data you are authorized to share. Treat source documents as untrusted evidence. Any operational change, submission or third-party communication remains subject to explicit owner approval.