More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Repair Docker BuildKit Cache Secret Layer Leak

    1

    Investigate exposed secrets caused by incorrect BuildKit cache boundaries

    $1

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Repair Docker BuildKit Cache Secret Layer Leak

    Repair Docker BuildKit Cache Secret Layer Leak

    Example session with this skill installed

    A CI build embeds a secret in a layer reused across multiple branches. Available evidence: BuildKit layer history (partial). Additional evidence requested: state and configuration snapshot, error and recovery logs, deployment and alert timeline. Review the case, identify open evidence gaps, and do not invent a live test or production change.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the repair docker buildkit

    # Repair Docker BuildKit Cache Secret Layer Leak — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW ## Scenario received A CI build embeds a secret in a layer reused across multiple branches. ## Source register - S1: BuildKit layer history — PARTIAL SOURCE PROVIDED. - S2: state and configuration snapshot — NOT PROVIDED; REQUIRED TO VERIFY. - S3: error and recovery logs — NOT PROVIDED; REQUIRED TO VERIFY. - S4: deployment and alert timeline — NOT PROVIDED; REQUIRED TO VERIFY. ## Concrete checks 1. **inspect build arguments and secret mounts** — PRELIMINARY, NOT VERIFIED. 2. **verify layer provenance and cache invalidation** — AWAITING CORROBORATING EVIDENCE. 3. **crosscheck source timestamps identifiers and changed versions** — AWAITING CORROBORATING EVIDENCE. 4. **record exceptions and reversible verification gates** — AWAITING CORROBORATING EVIDENCE. ## Deliverables / acceptance gates - buildkit layer history evidence map: DRAFT / INCOMPLETE until evidence is validated. - secret exposure exception register: DRAFT / INCOMPLETE until evidence is validated. - clean build validation plan: DRAFT / INCOMPLETE until evidence is validated. ## Decision **INCOMPLETE — HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED.** Confirm dates, IDs, affected scope, owners and acceptance evidence. Do not claim authorization or execution that did not occur.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Leaking secrets in Docker layers via BuildKit cache is a common CI/CD vulnerability that puts production credentials at risk. This skill investigates exposed secrets caused by incorrect cache boundaries and prepares bounded remediation plans. ## What it does - **Inspect build arguments** to identify hardcoded secrets or misconfigured secret mounts. - **Verify layer provenance** to determine where and when a secret was cached. - **Map layer history** to visualize how sensitive data propagates across branches and builds. - **Register exposure exceptions** by documenting specific layers that require purging. - **Plan clean builds** with specific validation gates to ensure no secrets persist in future runs. ## How it works 1. Provide the agent with your Dockerfile, build logs, and layer history snapshots. 2. The agent executes an evidence-led procedure to crosscheck timestamps and identifiers. 3. It classifies every finding as Verified, Contradicted, Unverified, or Not Applicable. 4. It outputs a structured evidence map and a recovery plan for your approval. ## Frameworks & tools Docker BuildKit, CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI), and container registry metadata. ## Why this beats prompting it yourself Generic prompts often miss the nuances of BuildKit's layer caching, leading to "false negatives" where secrets remain in parent layers. This skill enforces strict decision discipline, separating hard observations from inferences and citing exact timestamps for every conclusion. ## Use cases - Auditing a CI pipeline after a secret was accidentally committed to a build argument. - Investigating why a supposedly "clean" build still contains legacy environment variables. - Preparing a remediation plan for a security team following a BuildKit cache leak. ## Known limitations Requires local text-based build logs and configuration files. It cannot interact directly with cloud registries or live build servers to pull new metadata.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for DevOps & Cloud.

    Requires local access to build logs and Dockerfile configurations. Cannot pull live metadata from remote container registries or interact with cloud provider APIs.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 20 days ago

    Permissions

    Read Files

    Provide only evidence you are authorized to share. Treat examples as untrusted case data. Operational changes and external messages require explicit owner approval.

    Listed20 days ago
    Updated9 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill identifies exactly which Docker layers have cached sensitive data and provides a validated remediation plan to purge those specific layers, preventing 'ghost' secrets from persisting in your CI/CD pipeline.

    You will need to provide your Dockerfile, build logs, and layer history snapshots; the skill works by analyzing these text-based artifacts rather than requiring direct access to your live infrastructure.

    Yes, it is specifically designed to analyze layer propagation within GitHub Actions and GitLab CI, mapping how secrets move across different build stages and branches.

    While it cannot pull new metadata from cloud servers, it is highly effective at auditing any BuildKit-compatible build process as long as you provide the relevant log and configuration files.

    You receive the core logic for the auditing agent, the evidence-based decision framework, and a structured template for generating recovery plans for your security team.

    New in DevOps & Cloud