relationship pattern reality check
A structured behavioral analysis tool that separates observable actions from interpretations to clarify complex dynamics.
$5
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+21 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsrelationship pattern reality check
Example session with this skill installed
My business partner keeps saying they are committed to our new launch, but they missed the last three Friday syncs and haven't finished the API docs they promised weeks ago. I'm so frustrated.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the relationship pattern reality
I have analyzed the narrative regarding your business partner's recent involvement. By stripping away the frustration and focusing on the verifiable logs, a clear pattern of performative commitment emerges.
Relationship Pattern Analysis: Business Partnership
| Category | Observation |
|---|---|
| Observable Behaviors | Missed 3 consecutive Friday syncs; API documentation remains incomplete (3 weeks past due). |
| Words vs. Actions | Partner states "commitment to launch" vs. 0% attendance at recent milestones and 0 deliverables produced. |
| Conflict Dynamic | Avoidance-based. Promises are made to reduce immediate pressure but are not backed by scheduled output. |
| Responsibility Map | Partner: 100% of technical delivery; Shared: Launch timeline; User: Maintaining sync schedule. |
Emotional Cost Inventory
- Time: 3+ hours spent in unattended syncs.
- Energy: High anxiety regarding launch deadline.
- Self-Trust: Questioning if the launch is viable; secondary guessing of partner's initial reliability.
Alternative Explanations
Capacity Constraint: The partner is genuinely overwhelmed by a non-disclosed external project or personal crisis (High probability).
2.
Skill Gap: The API documentation task exceeds their current technical comfort level, leading to avoidance (Medium probability).
3.
Disengagement: The partner has mentally exited the project but is using verbal compliance to avoid the friction of a formal breakup (Low probability).
Change vs. Promises Evaluation
- Status: Performative Change.
Evidence: Verbal affirmations of commitment are high, but the behavioral delta (actual work produced) is currently zero.
Next steps
- Send a direct query: "I noticed the API docs are 21 days late. What specific blockers are preventing this from being finished by Tuesday?"
- Review the partnership agreement for "failure to deliver" clauses to ground your next conversation in facts, not feelings.
- Set a hard "Stop/Go" date for the launch that does not depend on verbal promises.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Interpersonal conflicts are often clouded by subjective interpretation and emotional bias. Developers and professionals struggle to separate what someone actually did from what they think it meant, leading to circular reasoning and stagnant decision-making.
What it does
- Extracts concrete, verifiable behaviors from narrative text, stripping away generalizations like 'always' or 'never'.
- Maps 'Words vs. Actions' in a structured table to identify frequency and recency of promises versus results.
- Identifies recurring conflict cycles, such as pursue-withdraw or avoid-explode, to pinpoint where resolution fails.
- Generates and ranks three plausible alternative explanations for behavior to eliminate intent-based assumptions.
- Inventories the cumulative emotional cost across time, energy, and self-trust to quantify the impact of the dynamic.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often mirror the user's bias or provide vague platitudes. This skill enforces a rigorous evidentiary framework that treats behavioral data like a system log, preventing the model from falling into 'mind-reading' or psychological speculation.
Use cases
- Evaluating professional partnerships when milestones are missed despite verbal reassurances.
- Analyzing recurring friction in technical team dynamics to identify responsibility allocation.
- Fact-checking personal relationship progress by comparing historical promises to current behavioral evidence.
- Preparing for difficult performance or boundary-setting conversations with specific, documented examples.
Known limitations
Does not provide clinical diagnoses or mental health assessments. Not suitable for legal evidence or situations involving physical safety risks.
Does not provide clinical diagnoses or mental health assessments. Not suitable for legal evidence or situations involving physical safety risks.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected