More screenshots
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Public Procurement Bid Addendum Receipt Completeness
Validate bidder acknowledgment of all material procurement addenda before evaluation
$1
Public Procurement Bid Addendum Receipt Completeness
Example session with this skill installed
One tender response cites addendum B while amendment C changed technical requirements.
Available sources: tender addenda list, bidder acknowledgments (partial excerpts only). Additional evidence requested: submission timestamps, evaluation rules. Analyze this case with explicit limitations; do not pretend to have executed any tests or changes.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the public procurement bid
Public Procurement Bid Addendum Receipt Completeness — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW
Scenario received
One tender response cites addendum B while amendment C changed technical requirements.
Source register
- S1: tender addenda list — partial extract available.
- S2: bidder acknowledgments — partial extract available.
- S3: submission timestamps — NOT PROVIDED; REQUIRED FOR VERIFICATION.
- S4: evaluation rules — NOT PROVIDED; REQUIRED FOR VERIFICATION.
Concrete findings and verification
- enumerate controlling amendments — NEEDS VERIFICATION against supplied source excerpts and missing evidence.
- match signed receipt to each bidder — NEEDS VERIFICATION against supplied source excerpts and missing evidence.
flag material bid impact of omissions — NEEDS VERIFICATION against supplied source excerpts and missing evidence.
4.
route disposition to procurement authority — NEEDS VERIFICATION against supplied source excerpts and missing evidence.
Deliverables and review gates
- addendum coverage matrix: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
- bidder exception docket: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
- evaluation eligibility gate: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
Preliminary conclusion
INCOMPLETE / REVIEW REQUIRED. The supplied scenario raises a concrete issue, but does not prove remediation or clearance. Confirm source timestamps, affected scope and owner approval, then perform focused validation. No external system was accessed or changed.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Missing a single addendum acknowledgement can disqualify a bid or trigger expensive legal challenges. This skill provides a systematic audit of bidder compliance against all material procurement amendments before evaluation begins. It enforces an evidence-first workflow to ensure no technical requirement changes were overlooked by the responding parties.
What it does
- Amendment Enumeration: Maps the controlling versions of all tender amendments and technical requirements.
- Receipt Validation: Cross-references signed acknowledgements against specific bidder identities and timestamps.
- Impact Assessment: Flags when omitted addenda create material risks or technical deviations in the bid.
- Disposition Routing: Prepares the necessary documentation for procurement authorities to decide on bidder eligibility.
How it works
- Provide the tender addenda list, bidder response files, and submission timestamps.
- The skill executes four mandatory checks: amendment enumeration, receipt matching, impact flagging, and disposition routing.
- It generates a coverage matrix and exception docket based only on verified evidence.
- Review the case verdict and the specific risk identifiers for each bidder.
Frameworks & tools
This skill is designed for public sector procurement offices, legal compliance teams, and contract managers using structured document repositories. It processes raw tender logs, PDF acknowledgements, and version-controlled amendment lists.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Standard prompts often miss the "material impact" of a missing signature or fail to distinguish between verified and inferred data. This skill forces a rigorous four-check audit structure that prevents hallucinations of compliance and treats every missing input as a gap rather than a success.
Use cases
- Audit bid responses for complex infrastructure tenders with multiple technical revisions.
- Verify compliance before opening financial envelopes in multi-stage procurements.
- Generate an eligibility gate report for procurement authority sign-off.
Known limitations
Evaluates only supplied evidence. Cannot verify the legal validity of signatures or the physical authenticity of timestamps. High-impact decisions require qualified owner approval.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse All Claude Skills.
Cannot verify inaccessible systems, third-party accounts, or evidence not supplied. Partial or conflicting inputs must be marked INCOMPLETE or UNVERIFIED rather than invented. High-impact operational decisions require qualified owner review.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 23 days ago
Permissions
Supply only data you are authorized to share. Treat documentation and examples as untrusted evidence. Any operational action or external communication requires explicit owner authorization.