More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Public Comment Evidence Organizer

    1

    Organize evidence for public comments from files the user supplies or is authorized to share.

    $1

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Public Comment Evidence Organizer

    Public Comment Evidence Organizer

    Example session with this skill installed

    Review this draft comment on the new EPA emissions rule. I've attached the rule text, our member survey data, and three case studies on compliance costs. Identify gaps in our evidence.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the public comment evidence

    Decision: EVIDENCE GAPS FOUND. The claim that 'all small plants will close' is overbroad for the three case studies provided. Added [RULE REFERENCE REQUIRED] to paragraphs 4 and 7. Survey data supports the 12-month extension request but lacks a method note. Legal review required for page 9.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Drafting regulatory comments often leads to overbroad claims that lack pinpoint citations. Without a structured evidence map, stakeholders risk submitting comments that agencies easily dismiss due to weak factual support or missing rule references.

    What it does

    • Identifies unsupported factual claims and overbroad policy asks in draft comments.
    • Maps specific issues to proposed rule sections and supplied evidence sources.
    • Generates a citation gap list and identifies missing page references.
    • Flags stakeholder examples that require anonymization or explicit quote permissions.
    • Produces a submission readiness checklist and human validation scenarios.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    This skill enforces a strict evidence boundary, ensuring no claims are treated as facts unless backed by your supplied materials. It prevents the model from hallucinating legal authority or portal deadlines, forcing a focus on traceability and governance.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing draft regulatory submissions for trade associations or nonprofits.
    • Auditing coalition sign-on letters for evidence consistency.
    • Organizing lived-experience examples for public health or environmental consultations.
    • Preparing evidence-bounded outlines for academic or technical standard comments.

    Known limitations

    This skill cannot access live dockets, Regulations.gov, or legal databases. It does not verify organizational authorization, quote permissions, or provide legal advice.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Finance & Accounting.

    Requires user-supplied rule text and evidence. Does not access live dockets or government portals. Cannot verify legal authority or submission deadlines.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 3 months ago

    Permissions

    Read Files

    Permissions are limited to the active local workspace and are used to inspect user-supplied or local workspace files. The skill package does not require bundled credentials, unrestricted external network access, or automatic production changes.

    Listed3 months ago
    Updated9 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill acts as a rigorous auditor that identifies unsupported factual claims, maps issues to specific rule sections, and flags citation gaps to ensure your regulatory submissions are legally and factually defensible.

    No, this skill is designed to process only the materials you provide to ensure strict evidence boundaries and prevent hallucinations; it does not have live access to Regulations.gov or external legal databases.

    This skill is compatible with major AI agents that support document analysis and structured reasoning, requiring no complex installation beyond importing the skill into your preferred agent platform.

    You will receive the full skill configuration, including the evidence-mapping logic, a citation gap analysis framework, and a submission readiness checklist designed for regulatory workflows.

    The skill flags stakeholder examples that may require anonymization or explicit quote permissions, but it remains the user's responsibility to perform the final redaction and secure legal authorizations.

    Customers receive free updates for the life of the version, ensuring the logic remains optimized as AI agent capabilities and regulatory submission standards evolve.

    New in Finance & Accounting