prompt pack release qa

    1

    Audit prompt products for release blockers, inconsistencies, and buyer friction using a P0-P3 severity scale.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    prompt pack release qa

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit my 'Python Refactor Pro' prompt pack. The description says it handles legacy code, but the prompt instructions only mention modern syntax. Here is the prompt text: [system prompt text...]

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the prompt release qa

    I have completed the audit for the 'Python Refactor Pro' prompt pack. The review identified a critical inconsistency between the marketing claims and the instruction set.

    Audit Report - Python Refactor Pro

    Section 1 – Executive Summary

    Readiness Level: Not Ready. The package contains one P0 blocker regarding functional inconsistency and two P2 moderate issues regarding missing guidance. The prompt fails to deliver on the primary value proposition mentioned in the description.

    Section 2 – Asset Map

    AssetTypeStatus
    Python Refactor Pro DescriptionMarketing CopyAnalyzed
    System Prompt TextPrompt LogicAnalyzed
    Example OutputsUser SampleNot Supplied

    Section 3 – Findings

    1. Dimension: Inconsistencies
      Severity: P0
      Evidence: Description claims "handles legacy code," but Prompt Text lines 12-15 explicitly state "Focus exclusively on PEP 8 and Python 3.10+ syntax."
      Issue: The prompt actively rejects the legacy code it claims to support.
      Recommended Fix: Update lines 12-15 to: "Analyze input for both legacy Python 2.x patterns and modern 3.x syntax. Provide migration paths for deprecated libraries."

    2. Dimension: Missing Guidance
      Severity: P2
      Evidence: "Not supplied"
      Issue: No instructions for the user on how to handle external dependencies or library-specific refactoring.
      Recommended Fix: Add a 'Setup' section to the user guide explaining that users should paste relevant library versions for better context.

    3. Dimension: Repetition
      Severity: P3
      Evidence: "Ensure the code is clean. Make sure the output is readable."
      Issue: Redundant instructions consuming tokens.
      Recommended Fix: Consolidate to: "Output clean, PEP 8 compliant code."

    Section 4 – Release Decision

    RELEASE DECISION: NOT READY
    BLOCKERS REMAINING: 1
    NEXT ACTION: Align the system prompt instructions with the legacy code support claims in your description.
    AUDIT ID: RPQA-d9e2b8
    

    Next steps

    • Apply the P0 fix to line 12 of your system prompt.
    • Consolidate redundant instructions to save tokens.
    • Resubmit the prompt for a final P0 clearance check.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Publishing a prompt pack with broken instructions, redundant boilerplate, or legal risks damages your reputation and leads to refund requests. Sellers often miss friction points or inconsistencies because they are too close to their own work.

    What it does

    • Inventories all supplied assets, prompts, and marketing claims to ensure package completeness.
    • Identifies P0 blockers including legal risks, broken functionality, and platform ToS violations.
    • Detects buyer friction such as missing setup steps or confusing prerequisites.
    • Flags weak differentiation where prompts lack substantive value over free alternatives.
    • Generates targeted code-style patches for identified issues rather than vague suggestions.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General-purpose prompts often provide generic praise or surface-level edits. This skill enforces a rigorous P0-P3 severity scale and mandatory asset mapping, ensuring every claim is backed by evidence found in your files. It prevents the AI from "hallucinating" that your product is perfect by requiring exact quotes for every audit dimension.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing a Gumroad prompt pack before the final launch.
    • Auditing complex system prompts for redundant logic or "token waste."
    • Checking marketing copy against actual prompt behavior to prevent false claims.
    • Identifying missing edge-case handling in specialized B2B prompts.

    Known limitations

    Cannot evaluate dimensions if the user does not provide the corresponding assets. It does not perform live execution testing of prompts.

    Requires manual input of prompt text and descriptions. Cannot perform live API testing or execute prompts in real-time. Missing assets will result in skipped audit dimensions.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 2 months ago

    Permissions

    No special permissions declared or detected

    Listed2 months ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The skill requires your prompt text, marketing description, and any example outputs. If you only provide the prompt, it will note which dimensions (like marketing consistency) cannot be audited.

    It uses a P0 to P3 severity scale. P0 covers legal risks, broken logic, or ToS violations, while P3 focuses on minor polish and style improvements.

    No. It analyzes the logic, structure, and instructions of the prompt text. It does not execute the prompt against an LLM to generate live results.

    Instead of vague feedback, the skill provides specific, code-style patches or exact text strings to fix identified issues directly.

    New in Agents & Orchestration