Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    Professional Research Pro

    1

    Investigate business questions with a clear research plan, traceable sources, and balanced evidence synthesis.

    $9.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Professional Research Pro

    Professional Research Pro

    Example session with this skill installed

    Research whether a 50-person software company should build an internal knowledge base or adopt a hosted tool. We need a decision brief by next month. No vendor list, budget, security requirements, or internal usage data has been provided. Do not invent market facts; give the research plan, decision criteria, priority sources, evidence table structure, and questions needed to reach a recommendation.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the professional research pro

    Research Plan — Internal Knowledge Base Decision

    Decision question

    Should the company build an internal knowledge base or adopt a hosted tool, given its users, security needs, budget, and operating capacity? A recommendation is not supportable yet because key inputs and vendor evidence are missing.

    Scope and criteria

    Compare options across: total cost over an agreed period; setup and ongoing administration; search and permission controls; data location and export; integration needs; accessibility; reliability and support; migration effort; and ability to meet internal security requirements. Confirm weighting with the decision owner before scoring.

    Priority research

    Internal needs: interview representative teams; review current search pain, content types, usage, and access requirements.
    2. Build feasibility: estimate engineering, hosting, security review, maintenance, backup, and ownership over time.
    3.

    Hosted options: create a vendor shortlist only after security and integration constraints are known; verify current product documentation, pricing, data terms, and service commitments directly with vendors.
    4.

    Pilot evidence: test a small, representative set of content and users against agreed search tasks. Measure success, time to find information, permission accuracy, and maintenance effort.

    Evidence table

    Claim or questionSourceDate checkedMethod / populationLimitationDecision relevance
    Total costInternal estimates and vendor quotesRecord when gatheredInclude setup, seats, hosting, support, and laborQuotes may exclude future usage or add-onsCompare over an agreed time horizon
    Security fitInternal requirements and vendor documentationRecord version/dateReview controls against approved requirementsDocumentation may not establish implementationSecurity owner signs off
    Search usefulnessPilot task resultsRecord pilot datesUse representative users and contentSmall pilot may not predict adoptionValidate before wider rollout

    Inputs needed

    Budget range, security and privacy requirements, current systems, content volume and sensitivity, integration needs, internal ownership capacity, and target decision date.

    Reporting standard

    Cite every external claim with source, title, date, and access date. Distinguish vendor statements from independently tested evidence. Include counterevidence and unresolved risks. No factual market comparison or recommendation is asserted until research is completed.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Professional Research Pro

    Investigate workplace questions systematically, using fit-for-purpose sources and a clear evidence trail. Turn findings into a balanced brief that distinguishes established facts, estimates, and unresolved questions.

    Deliverables

    • Research question and scope
    • Search plan and source selection criteria
    • Evidence matrix with citations and dates
    • Findings, counterevidence, and confidence limits
    • Decision-ready brief and recommended next research

    Workflow

    1. Clarify the decision, audience, timeframe, geography, and definitions.
    2. Identify authoritative primary sources and relevant high-quality secondary analysis.
    3. Search systematically, record queries, publication dates, and access dates.
    4. Extract claims with supporting citations; check conflicts, methodology, and limitations.
    5. Synthesize evidence without overstating consensus or causation.

    Guardrails

    Do not fabricate sources, citations, quotations, or findings. Mark unsupported claims and stale information. For legal, medical, financial, or other high-impact topics, route conclusions to qualified reviewers.

    How to use

    Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 2 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Requires

    Research access may be useful depending on the question. The researcher supplies the decision context and validates source access and citations.

    Listed2 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions