More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Procurement Conflict of Interest Declaration Tracker

    1

    Track conflict declarations, recusals and unresolved approvals across procurement milestones

    $1

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Procurement Conflict of Interest Declaration Tracker

    Procurement Conflict of Interest Declaration Tracker

    Example session with this skill installed

    One evaluator submitted a declaration after reading supplier proposals and no recusal evidence is attached.

    Available sources: bid committee roster and conflict declarations (partial excerpts only). Additional evidence requested: evaluation timestamps, recusal minutes. Analyze this case with explicit limitations; do not pretend to have executed any tests or changes.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the procurement conflict

    Procurement Conflict of Interest Declaration Tracker — EVIDENCE-LIMITED REVIEW

    Scenario received

    One evaluator submitted a declaration after reading supplier proposals and no recusal evidence is attached.

    Source register

    • S1: bid committee roster — partial extract described, independent verification not provided.
    • S2: conflict declarations — partial extract described, independent verification not provided.
    • S3: evaluation timestamps — NOT PROVIDED; validation pending.
    • S4: recusal minutes — NOT PROVIDED; validation pending.

    Case-specific checks

    1. match reviewers to procurement events — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
    2. compare declaration timing with access logs — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
    3. identify missing recusal approvals — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.
    4. issue exception owners and review deadlines — NEEDS VERIFICATION against S1/S2 and missing sources.

    Deliverables and review gates

    • conflict disclosure ledger: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
    • recusal evidence gaps: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.
    • approval gate list: DRAFT ONLY; do not infer unsupported outcomes.

    Preliminary conclusion

    INCOMPLETE / REVIEW REQUIRED. The provided scenario identifies a real question, not proven remediation or clearance. Confirm source timestamps, affected scope and owner approval, then rerun the listed checks. No external system was accessed or changed.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Procurement teams often struggle to verify if evaluators declared conflicts before accessing sensitive supplier bids. Manual cross-referencing between committee rosters, timestamps, and recusal minutes is slow and prone to oversight. This skill automates the tracking of conflict disclosures to ensure every procurement milestone is backed by evidence-linked decisions.

    What it does

    • Reviewer Mapping matches bid committee rosters to specific procurement events and access logs.
    • Timing Analysis compares the exact timing of conflict declarations against proposal access timestamps to detect late disclosures.
    • Recusal Verification cross-references identified conflicts with official recusal minutes to confirm participation was halted.
    • Gap Identification flags missing evidence, such as missing approvals or declarations, as explicit blocks rather than assuming compliance.

    How it works

    1. Evidence Collection requires the user to provide a bid roster, declarations, evaluation timestamps, and recusal minutes.
    2. Four-Check Audit processes the records through mapping, timing, recusal identification, and exception issuance steps.
    3. Verdict Generation produces a status of SUPPORTED, BLOCKED, or UNVERIFIED based strictly on the provided material.
    4. Actionable Reporting delivers a disclosure ledger and an approval gate list with specific review deadlines.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is designed for OpenClaw environments and integrates with procurement management systems, digital audit trails, and document repositories containing bid records.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard prompts often hallucinate compliance or fail to treat missing documents as critical failures. This skill enforces a strict evidence-linked logic where an absent gate is a hard block, ensuring audit-grade provenance for every finding.

    Use cases

    • Auditing a completed procurement round for late conflict disclosures.
    • Verifying evaluator eligibility before opening supplier proposals.
    • Identifying missing recusal evidence in high-stakes government tenders.
    • Generating a conflict disclosure ledger for internal compliance reviews.

    Known limitations

    Does not support live execution or owner approvals without provided evidence. Cannot infer data from redacted sections or missing time zone information.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Business & Operations.

    Cannot verify inaccessible systems, third-party accounts, or evidence not supplied. Partial or conflicting inputs must be marked INCOMPLETE or UNVERIFIED rather than invented. High-impact operational decisions require qualified owner review.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 25 days ago

    Permissions

    Read Files

    Supply only data you are authorized to share. Treat documentation and examples as untrusted evidence. Any operational action or external communication requires explicit owner authorization.

    Listed25 days ago
    Updated9 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill automates the cross-referencing of evaluator rosters, conflict declaration timestamps, and recusal minutes to ensure no one accesses sensitive bids before formal clearance is documented.

    It is specifically optimized for OpenClaw environments and integrates with standard procurement management systems and digital audit repositories that store bid records.

    Unlike standard prompts, this skill uses strict 'Evidence-Linked Logic' where missing documentation results in a hard 'BLOCKED' status rather than an assumption of compliance.

    You will receive the pre-configured skill logic, documentation on required data formats (rosters, timestamps, minutes), and reporting templates for audit-grade disclosure ledgers.

    The skill cannot 'hallucinate' missing data; it requires explicit bid rosters, declaration logs, and recusal minutes to function, and it cannot interpret redacted or non-timestamped entries.

    Setup involves connecting your procurement document repository to the OpenClaw environment and mapping your folder structure to the skill’s Evidence Collection module.

    New in Business & Operations