More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    Parallax Customer Evidence

    1

    Find recurring needs and buying objections in customer interviews, reviews and sales chats, with quotes to support each finding.

    $7

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Parallax Customer Evidence

    Parallax Customer Evidence

    Example session with this skill installed

    Fictional raw research packet: BenchRelay

    All people, organizations, products, quotations, and events below are fictional, created for this exercise.

    User request

    We are considering BenchRelay, a shared handover note for bicycle repair work. Our initial idea is a $20/month subscription that every small repair operator could use. We have not charged anyone for it. Please tell us what these materials support, which customer group and offer we should explore first if any, and what the next two interviews and one small pilot should learn. Include a traceable evidence table and counts I can explain to my co-founder. We would also like to know whether these notes justify a sales claim. Use English.

    The three workshop businesses are the primary research group. We also spoke to a mobile operator and a volunteer club organizer because they repair bicycles. Participants were recruited through the founder's contacts; there was no random sampling. The dates below are in 2026. Internal analysis is permitted; nobody has given permission to become a public testimonial.

    Participant registry

    ParticipantOrganizationRoleContext
    P01, DanaA01, Finch WheelworksOwner; purchases softwareWorkshop with four staff
    P02, IvoA01, Finch WheelworksLead mechanic; does not control software budgetSame workshop as P01
    P03, LenaA02, Lantern CyclesOwner and mechanicWorkshop with two staff
    P04, RemyA03, Corner SpokeWorkshop manager; owner approves subscriptionsWorkshop with six staff
    P05, SalA04, Rollside MobileSole proprietorMobile repair visits; works alone
    P06, TerryA05, Northbank Repair ClubVolunteer organizerFree monthly community event; no purchasing budget

    S01 — P01 interview, 4 October

    Recruiter note: The interviewer described a shared handover app before asking about problems. Asked about recent missed handovers, current tools, and possible price. No observation of the workshop was conducted.

    [L1] Interviewer: What happens when someone else picks up a repair?

    [L2] P01: "We lose maybe five jobs a week because the next person doesn't know what was agreed. At least, that's what it feels like when the phone rings."

    [L3] P01: "We use a whiteboard for status and a paper tag for the customer's instructions. I pay $45 a month for booking reminders, and I'd only want another tool if it replaced something."

    [L4] Interviewer: Would $20 a month be reasonable for the handover app I showed you?

    [L5] P01: "Twenty sounds fine if the mechanics actually use it and I can stop paying for reminders. I haven't tried your app yet."

    S02 — P01 follow-up message, 8 October

    This is the same P01 as S01. The founder asked Dana to check the examples and numbers from the interview.

    [L1] P01: "I checked our book for the last four weeks. There were two late pickups after a handover, not five lost jobs a week. Neither customer asked for a refund. Please correct that."

    [L2] P01: "One was waiting for a part. For the other, nobody wrote down that the customer needed the bike by lunchtime. I still want that note visible."

    [L3] P01: "The reminder company can't be cancelled until January. I wouldn't buy another subscription this month."

    S03 — CRM excerpt export, 9 October

    Metadata: Participant P01, organization A01. Imported from the S01 interview transcript, not a new interview.

    [Row 14, text] "We use a whiteboard for status and a paper tag for the customer's instructions. I pay $45 a month for booking reminders, and I'd only want another tool if it replaced something."

    [Row 14, CRM sales status] Interested

    S04 — P02 interview, 5 October

    Asked about the last handover, current tools, and use of a shared note. Did not ask about price or purchasing authority beyond the role noted in the registry.

    [L1] P02: "Yesterday I picked up a brake job after lunch. The paper tag said 'call first', so I called before fitting the part. It worked."

    [L2] P02: "When the tag is missing, I walk over and ask whoever spoke to the customer. That happened twice last week. It took a minute or two each time."

    [L3] P02: "I don't want another thing to type into with greasy gloves. If the front desk writes it once and I can see it beside the job, that's useful."

    [L4] P02: "Dana says the phone interruptions are worse than I think. I'm usually on the repair stand, not answering calls."

    S05 — P03 interview, 6 October

    Asked about the last handover, consequences, current spending, and alternatives. No product demo was shown.

    [L1] P03: "There are only two of us and we overlap all day. We say the job number aloud and put the tag on the handlebars."

    [L2] P03: "The last missing note I remember was in August. I called the customer back. It was awkward, but the repair still went out that day."

    [L3] P03: "Our problem is finding parts, not passing notes. I wouldn't add a subscription to solve this."

    [L4] P03: "We pay the card processor and that's it for software. If we hired an evening shift, I might think differently."

    S06 — P04 interview after a free trial, 10 October

    Asked about actual trial use, current workaround, next use, and purchasing route. The founder supplied a free prototype on 7 October; it had no checkout or payment screen.

    [L1] P04: "It looks lovely, and I clicked the thumbs-up on your launch post. I put eighteen open jobs into the trial on Tuesday."

    [L2] P04: "By Thursday we were back to the group chat. I was entering the same update in the booking system and your tool. I couldn't keep doing both."

    [L3] P04: "Every Saturday, the morning team leaves and a different team closes. Last Saturday I called someone at home to ask whether a wheel was ready. That's the moment I want to fix."

    [L4] P04: "I could arrange a Saturday test, but the owner decides about subscriptions. She hasn't seen it. I can't tell you what she'd pay."

    S07 — prototype event export, 7–10 October

    Provided by the founder. Organization A03 and participant P04 are linked through the prototype account. The logger captures only the events listed; it does not record calls, job completion, or users of the shared screen.

    RowDateParticipantEventValue
    17 OctoberP04account_createdfree_trial
    27 OctoberP04import_completed18 jobs
    37 OctoberP04dashboard_opened1 session
    48 OctoberP04dashboard_opened1 session

    S08 — P05 interview, 7 October

    Asked about recent work, customer updates, current spending, and price. Sal works alone and does not hand work to another technician.

    [L1] P05: "I message customers when I'm on my way. Yesterday I forgot one update and the customer had already left for work. I drove there for nothing."

    [L2] P05: "I use my calendar and ordinary messages. A reminder to send my arrival time could help. A shared job board would just be me talking to myself."

    [L3] P05: "I haven't paid for a reminder tool. I would need to see it save me a wasted trip before I considered one."

    S09 — P06 group message, 9 October

    The founder posted a screenshot and asked for reactions. This was not a structured interview; nobody asked about a recent handover or financial consequence.

    [L1] P06: "Nice idea! Our volunteers might enjoy the colored cards. Everything at the club is free, and I don't have a budget for software."

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the parallax customer evidence
    • Generated the data export

    Fictional demonstration from an actual local trial. This is not a real customer result. Local links and machine-specific paths are displayed as text.

    Explore a shift-handover pilot, not a subscription for every repair operator

    The strongest next opportunity is a narrow test at A03, where a different team closes on Saturdays and P04 can arrange access. First speak to its owner: P04 is a user and manager, not the subscription buyer. Test whether a handover note can stay beside the existing job record without duplicate entry. Do not sell a general $20/month proposition on the present evidence.

    There are

    zero recorded purchases of BenchRelay. The material does not establish how many people would pay $20, recurring retention, avoided lost jobs, revenue uplift, or market size. No participant has authorised a public testimonial.

    Source and sample map

    I read the full participant registry and S01–S09. The nine supplied source collections include interviews, a follow-up, a duplicate CRM excerpt, a prototype event export, and a group reaction. The event export has four rows; it does not add four people. evidence-ledger.csv retains the exact participant excerpts with their source locators; duplicate material is identified below.

    SourceDate, 2026Person/accountType and collection context
    S014 OctP01/A01Interview after interviewer described the proposed app; price prompted at $20
    S028 OctP01/A01Same person's requested correction/follow-up
    S039 OctP01/A01CRM export of S01 L3; duplicate quotation, no new interview
    S045 OctP02/A01Mechanic interview; price not asked
    S056 OctP03/A02Owner/mechanic interview; no demo shown
    S0610 OctP04/A03Manager interview after free trial; buyer not interviewed
    S077–10 OctP04/A03Four logger rows: one account, import of 18 jobs, two dashboard openings
    S087 OctP05/A04Solo mobile operator interview, different workflow
    S099 OctP06/A05Volunteer screenshot reaction; not a structured problem interview

    The registry establishes

    six distinct participants across five organisations. The primary workshop sample is

    four people across three buying accounts: P01 and P02 are two voices at A01; P03 is A02; P04 is A03. The mobile operator is one person/account; the volunteer club is one person/account with no software budget. Do not pool those segments into a six-person workshop denominator. Recruitment through founder contacts and leading product/price questions at S01 limit generalisation.

    Traceable evidence table

    Quote IDs below are stable locators; the companion ledger preserves complete source quotations. “Reported” means reported by the participant, not independently observed.

    IDSourceExact excerpt or explicitly labelled recordKindInterpretation and limit
    Q01S01 L2, P01/A01“We lose maybe five jobs a week because the next person doesn't know what was agreed. At least, that's what it feels like when the phone rings.”Initial reported impressionSuperseded as a quantity by Q04; never use as measured loss
    Q02S01 L3, P01/A01“We use a whiteboard for status and a paper tag for the customer's instructions. I pay $45 a month for booking reminders, and I'd only want another tool if it replaced something.”Reported workaround/spending; conditional preferenceExisting spend is for reminders, not BenchRelay; S03 repeats this exact quote
    Q03S01 L5, P01/A01“Twenty sounds fine if the mechanics actually use it and I can stop paying for reminders. I haven't tried your app yet.”Prompted future intentionConditional on use and replacement; no purchase
    Q04S02 L1, P01/A01“I checked our book for the last four weeks. There were two late pickups after a handover, not five lost jobs a week. Neither customer asked for a refund. Please correct that.”Corrected reported past eventsTwo late pickups in four weeks, not lost jobs; book itself not supplied
    Q05S02 L2, P01/A01“One was waiting for a part. For the other, nobody wrote down that the customer needed the bike by lunchtime. I still want that note visible.”Reported causes and current preferenceOnly one of the two described cases directly concerns missing customer timing information
    Q06S02 L3, P01/A01“The reminder company can't be cancelled until January. I wouldn't buy another subscription this month.”Current constraint and buying refusalRevises the practical meaning of Q03; no purchase this month
    Q07S04 L1, P02/A01“Yesterday I picked up a brake job after lunch. The paper tag said 'call first', so I called before fitting the part. It worked.”Reported successful workaroundPaper already succeeds in at least this case
    Q08S04 L2, P02/A01“When the tag is missing, I walk over and ask whoever spoke to the customer. That happened twice last week. It took a minute or two each time.”Reported past interruptionLimited stated time consequence, not a lost job
    Q09S04 L3, P02/A01“I don't want another thing to type into with greasy gloves. If the front desk writes it once and I can see it beside the job, that's useful.”Conditional usability preferenceFront-desk entry plus visibility is more credible than mechanic re-entry
    Q10S05 L3, P03/A02“Our problem is finding parts, not passing notes. I wouldn't add a subscription to solve this.”Current priority/refusalStrong contrary case for a universal workshop subscription
    Q11S05 L4, P03/A02“We pay the card processor and that's it for software. If we hired an evening shift, I might think differently.”Reported spending; conditional future intentionA different shift pattern could change need, but is not present demand
    Q12S06 L1, P04/A03“It looks lovely, and I clicked the thumbs-up on your launch post. I put eighteen open jobs into the trial on Tuesday.”Attitude and reported trial useCompliment/like not payment; import corroborated by S07, not all chronology
    Q13S06 L2, P04/A03“By Thursday we were back to the group chat. I was entering the same update in the booking system and your tool. I couldn't keep doing both.”Reported abandonment and burdenMaterial negative evidence despite initial use
    Q14S06 L3, P04/A03“Every Saturday, the morning team leaves and a different team closes. Last Saturday I called someone at home to ask whether a wheel was ready. That's the moment I want to fix.”Reported recurring situation and recent eventConcrete shift transition; frequency of disruptive calls remains unknown
    Q15S06 L4, P04/A03“I could arrange a Saturday test, but the owner decides about subscriptions. She hasn't seen it. I can't tell you what she'd pay.”Access intention and buying authorityTest access possible; payer's view missing
    E01S07 rows 1–4, P04/A03Record: free account; 18-job import; dashboard open on 7 and 8 OctSupplied event recordNo payment, call, completion, or shared-screen-user data
    Q16S08 L1, P05/A04“I message customers when I'm on my way. Yesterday I forgot one update and the customer had already left for work. I drove there for nothing.”Reported past eventA customer-arrival communication problem, not technician handover
    Q17S08 L2, P05/A04“I use my calendar and ordinary messages. A reminder to send my arrival time could help. A shared job board would just be me talking to myself.”Reported workaround and preferenceSeparate solo-operator use case
    Q18S08 L3, P05/A04“I haven't paid for a reminder tool. I would need to see it save me a wasted trip before I considered one.”No reported spend; conditional future intentionNo present buying commitment
    Q19S09 L1, P06/A05“Nice idea! Our volunteers might enjoy the colored cards. Everything at the club is free, and I don't have a budget for software.”Friendly attitude; budget constraintNo tested handover problem or payer

    P02 also reports a perspective difference with P01 at S04 L4, not independent evidence of P01's interruption count. S05 L1–L2 describe an overlapping two-person team and an August missing note resolved by a same-day callback; those details reinforce Q10 without proving the problem never occurs.

    Themes and counterexamples

    ThemePrimary-workshop support and denominatorCounterexample or unknownDecision implication
    Some recent handover information goes missing3/4 workshop participants: P01 Q05, P02 Q08, P04 Q14; across 2/3 accounts A01/A03P03/A02 describes low current need; P02 Q07 shows a working paper tagExplore the triggering transition rather than all repair businesses
    Adding another tool/entry step can defeat adoption3/4 participants: P01 Q02/Q06, P02 Q09, P04 Q13; 2/3 accountsP03 rejects the need for a subscription for a different reason; no tested integration solutionAvoid another duplicate entry surface; do not claim an integration exists
    Shift change is a concrete test situationP04 is the 1/4 reporting a current different-team Saturday handover; 1/3 accountsP03 only says a future evening shift might change their view; P01/P02's shift structure not establishedA03 is the first test location, not a proven market segment
    $20/month purchasing support0 confirmed BenchRelay buyers across 3 workshop accountsP01's earlier conditional response is followed by a current refusal; P03 refuses; A03's owner unasked; P02 not asked and lacks authorityNo demand count or sales extrapolation

    These are overlapping themes, not additive customer totals. “Not asked” and “not mentioned” are not negative answers. All rates refer only to this small recruited sample.

    Offer hypothesis and next two interviews

    Hypothesis: a workshop with different people opening and closing may value a handover note entered once and visible beside the existing job. The user is the team doing handovers; at A03, P04 can coordinate the test but the owner decides and pays. A bounded offer candidate is a two-Saturday handover setup/test using their existing workflow, not an extra monthly tool sold on unbuilt integration promises. The paying reason—fewer disruptive follow-up calls or less uncertainty—is still a hypothesis, not a saving already measured.

    Interview 1: A03's owner, with P04's context available. Ask: “Walk me through the last Saturday handover you personally dealt with”; “What did the team do when information was missing?”; “What did that cost in time or other consequences, if anything?”; “Which systems must remain in place?”; “Who authorises a workflow or software purchase, and what did the last such purchase involve?” Do not lead with $20 or assume the owner wants the prototype.

    Interview 2: a contrasting workshop decision-maker whose opening and closing teams differ but who currently manages handovers without a new tool; recruitment is a proposed criterion, not an existing contact. Ask for the last actual shift transition, how the note was recorded and found, a recent exception, alternatives tried, actual spend, and why the present method might be preferable. This tests whether A03's problem is a wider transition need or a local duplicate-entry/workflow problem. If access is unavailable, deepen A02's successful overlapping-team case rather than invent a new interview.

    One small pilot

    Ask A03's owner and P04 to agree a

    two-Saturday pilot for the existing set of handovers, using only a note arrangement the team can actually maintain without promised integrations. Scope: agree the needed job fields, rehearse the handover, observe the two transitions with permission, and review a simple log afterward. Keep each note linked to the existing job and capture who entered it and whether a second entry was required.

    Proposed learning measures: number of eligible handovers, notes available when needed, clarification contacts, duplicate entries, entry time, missing fields, and whether the team returns to group chat. Establish denominators before the first Saturday. Capture a prior comparable Saturday if records exist, but do not claim a causal improvement from an uncontrolled before/after comparison.

    Proposed decision rule: continue exploring only if both Saturdays are completed, the team chooses to keep the approach afterward, and the log shows no routine second update needed for the same fact. Any information gap, adoption failure, or workaround return is material evidence to revise the approach. These are selected pilot criteria, not industry benchmarks. A small free pilot tests workability, not payment. After reviewing actual use, show the owner a clearly scoped continuation at the proposed $20/month with explicit cancellation and data-handling terms; only an actual payment would establish a purchase at those terms. Do not treat a yes, a click, a trial, or a deposit as recurring retention.

    No outreach, pilot, charge, or publication was executed. The present packet justifies investigating a narrow handover situation; it does

    not justify a public claim of proven demand, avoided lost jobs, or results. Testimonials require separate permission. The CRM “Interested” label and launch-post reaction add no new buyer evidence.

    evidence-ledger.csv

    CSV · data export

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Find out what customers keep asking for and what stops them from buying. Paste your interview notes, reviews or sales conversations.

    What you get

    • A summary of recurring needs, objections and alternatives customers use.
    • Supporting quotes linked to the original notes.
    • Differences between customer groups, plus follow-up questions and a small next test.

    Repeated records are checked so the same feedback is not counted twice. Small samples stay small: a few positive comments are not treated as proof of demand.

    Load this reusable skill in your Agensi-connected AI assistant. It analyzes the material you provide; it does not collect interviews or scrape reviews. AI service fees are separate.

    How to use

    Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 3 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed3 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions