Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    Page Budget Editor

    1

    Reduces proposal sections to specific page budgets while protecting mandatory requirements and tracking every cut.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned
    Page Budget Editor

    Page Budget Editor

    Example session with this skill installed

    Cut section 4.2 in proposal_draft.md to 2 pages. 450 words/page. Graphics count. Mandatory IDs: SOW-101, SOW-102. Move overflow to Appendix A. Output to section_4.2_cut.md.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the page budget editor
    • Generated the document

    Processed section 4.2. Reduced from 2.8 pages (1,260 words) to 1.95 pages (878 words). All mandatory SOW IDs (SOW-101, SOW-102) are preserved in the body narrative.

    Section 4.2: Technical Implementation

    Budget: 2.0 pages | Initial: 2.8 pages | Final: 1.95 pages | Words: 878

    4.2.1 System Architecture [SOW-101]

    The proposed architecture utilizes a distributed node network to ensure high availability. Each node operates independently, processing data streams in real-time. This configuration supports the mandatory 99.9% uptime requirement.

    4.2.2 Security Protocols [SOW-102]

    Our security framework implements AES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. Access controls are managed via a centralized identity provider, ensuring that all session logs are immutable and auditable.
    Detailed Encryption Walkthrough: Appendix A (SOW-102).

    Local Compliance Table

    Requirement IDLocationStatus
    SOW-1014.2.1Compliant
    SOW-1024.2.2Compliant

    Appendix A: Supplemental Narrative

    Moved from 4.2.2: The encryption walkthrough involving the Monday clerk cycle was relocated here to meet page constraints. This narrative provides secondary evidence for the TLS 1.3 implementation (SOW-102).

    Dropped-vs-Kept Log

    BlockKindActionPagesDestinationReason
    Intro 4.2restated introcut0.15Repeated heading content
    Fig 4-1graphickept0.40BodyRequired for SOW-101
    Walkthroughexamplemoved0.30Appendix ASecond example for SOW-102

    Next steps

    • Review the pointers in Section 4.2.2 to ensure the flow to Appendix A is logical.
    • Verify that the figure placeholder in Section 4.2.1 aligns with the final graphic dimensions.
    • Finalize the Appendix A heading to match the master proposal template.

    page-budget-editor.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Reduce section length to meet strict RFP page caps without losing compliance.Audit narrative blocks against SOW identifiers to ensure coverage.Automate the creation of a dropped-vs-kept log for proposal reviews.Extract non-essential examples into appendices to optimize body space.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Proposals and SOWs often exceed strict page limits, forcing developers and proposal leads to manually prune text. The risk of accidentally deleting a mandatory requirement ("shall") or failing to account for graphic real estate leads to non-compliant submissions.

    What it does

    • Calculates precise page counts using word density, table row counts, and graphic placeholders.
    • Inventories every document block to map narrative evidence to specific SOW/PWS identifiers.
    • Ranks potential cuts by priority, targeting redundant intros and culture padding first.
    • Relocates overflow narrative to appendices with cross-reference pointers to maintain compliance.
    • Generates a dropped-vs-kept log to audit every change against the original draft.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic LLM prompts often "hallucinate" page counts or drop technical requirements to hit a length target. This skill enforces a rigid inventory-first procedure that treats mandatory requirements as immutable, ensuring the cut draft remains 100% compliant with the solicitation.

    Use cases

    • Reducing a three-page technical section to a two-page limit without losing mandatory claims.
    • Moving non-essential worked examples to an appendix to make room for required figures.
    • Auditing a draft to identify "padding" like slogans or restated win themes that consume budget.
    • Ensuring all SOW identifiers are mapped to narrative blocks before and after document compression.

    Known limitations

    This skill requires an already coherent draft. It will not fix disjointed structure, write new content, or adjust document margins and font sizes to bypass limits.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 1 day ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed1 day ago

    Frequently Asked Questions