Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    open world research audit

    1

    A rigorous audit tool to stress-test research claims, map evidence, and identify decision-reversal conditions.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    open world research audit

    open world research audit

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit this expansion strategy memo against the attached Q3 regional data. Identify the claims that control the 'Go' decision and tell me when that decision should change.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the open world research

    I have completed the audit of the "EMEA Expansion Strategy v2.1" using the provided Q3 Regional Data CSV. The audit focused on the material claims triggering the Phase 1 rollout.

    Audit Findings: MATERIAL_ISSUES_FOUND

    Scope Record

    • Report: EMEA Expansion Strategy v2.1
    • Evidence: Q3 Regional Sales Data, Logistics Capacity Report
    • Status: 2 claims UNSUPPORTED, 1 UNDERDETERMINED
    IDClaim LocatorTypeStatusMateriality
    C01"Market demand in Poland exceeds 20% YoY"FactUNSUPPORTEDHigh (Primary Trigger)
    C02"Existing Berlin hub can handle Warsaw volume"InferencePARTIALLY_SUPPORTEDMedium
    C03"Regulatory approval is a formality"HypothesisUNDERDETERMINEDHigh (Blocker)

    Detailed Assessment

    C01 Evidence Gap: The Q3 data (E01) shows only 12% growth for the Polish market. The 20% figure in the memo appears to be an extrapolation of a single week in August, not the quarterly average.

    C02 Dependency: Support for the Berlin hub capacity (E02) assumes a 24-hour shift rotation which is not currently active. Without this shift change, the claim is UNSUPPORTED.

    Decision Boundary: The 'Go' decision for Poland is currently unsupported by the provided evidence. A reversal to 'Proceed' requires evidence of 18%+ growth or a finalized labor contract for the Berlin hub expansion.

    Strongest Supported Conclusion
    The evidence permits a pilot in the Czech Republic (15% growth, verified capacity) but does not support the full Poland expansion as proposed.

    Next steps

    1. Provide the source for the 20% YoY growth figure to resolve C01.
    2. Verify if the Berlin 24-hour shift rotation has been approved by the works council.
    3. Attach the specific regulatory filing referenced in C03.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Research reports and strategy memos often suffer from logical leaps, hidden assumptions, and unverified claims. This skill provides a rigorous audit framework to stress-test existing documents against supplied evidence, separating what is proven from what is merely inferred.

    What it does

    • Claim extraction identifies decision-bearing statements and maps them to specific report locators.
    • Evidence mapping traces claims to supplied source documents while flagging unverified assertions.
    • Support classification rates each claim as supported, partially supported, underdetermined, or unsupported.
    • Assumption exposure surface hidden definitions or numeric probability bands that lack a statistical basis.
    • Decision boundary analysis determines the specific conditions under which a recommendation should change.

    How it works

    1. Scope freeze records the report version, available evidence, and the user's intended decision or thesis.
    2. Materiality audit extracts 5 to 8 pivotal claims and tests their factual dependencies separately from risk preferences.
    3. Verification assigns source IDs to evidence and tests for entailment, contradictions, and jurisdictional relevance.
    4. Calibration produces a decision boundary report highlighting permitted actions, missing evidence, and reversal conditions.

    Frameworks & tools

    This tool uses a structured audit protocol incorporating a failure taxonomy and evidence rubric. It processes Markdown, PDF excerpts, and text-based memos.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard prompting often results in the AI agreeing with the report's tone or hallucinating supporting facts. This skill enforces a strict evidence-to-claim mapping protocol that prevents silent browsing and requires explicit locators for every judgment.

    Use cases

    • Strategy memo review to find logical gaps before a high-stakes board meeting.
    • Market analysis stress-test to identify which trends are backed by data versus expert opinion.
    • Due diligence support for auditing claims made in investment pitches against provided data rooms.
    • Deep Research verification to ensure AI-generated reports haven't drifted from their primary sources.

    Known limitations

    This skill does not perform research from scratch or provide legal, medical, or investment advice. It requires an existing report and is limited to the evidence provided in the context window.

    How to use

    Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 14 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed14 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions