op ed coach
Draft and critique professional op-eds and long-form posts using elite editorial frameworks from the NYT and beyond.
Free
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsop ed coach
Example session with this skill installed
Critique my draft about why remote work is failing. It's about 900 words. I focus on how Zoom calls are tiring and why we need to go back to the office for culture.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the op ed coach
I have analyzed your draft. It currently suffers from "Debbie Downer" syndrome: plenty of complaints about Zoom fatigue, but no specific solution. The opening is abstract, and at 900 words, it will be rejected by most editors immediately.
Op-Ed Critique & Rewrite
| Element | Status | Feedback |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematic Opener | Fail | You start with "Remote work has changed everything." This is a cliché. You need a scene. |
| Why Now? | Weak | You mention general fatigue, but lack a specific news hook or recent study. |
| The Solution | Missing | You argue for "culture" but don't define the specific new office model. |
| Word Count | 900 | Must be cut by at least 150 words to meet the 750-word sweet spot. |
Revised Cinematic Opener
"Monday morning, 9:02 AM. Marcus sits in a dim kitchen in suburban Ohio, staring at a grid of sixteen pixelated faces. He hasn't spoken a word aloud yet today, but his jaw is already tight. This isn't 'flexibility'; it's digital isolation."
Suggested Headlines
- Remote Work is Killing the Mentorship Loop. Here is How to Fix It.
- The Zoom Era is Over. We Just Haven't Admitted it Yet.
- Why 'Work From Anywhere' Resulted in Working From Nowhere.
Pitch Paragraph
I am writing to you because as a manager of 50 remote engineers over the last three years, I’ve seen the tangible decay of junior developer growth firsthand. With recent data showing a 20% dip in peer-to-peer training, I am proposing a 'Structured Hybrid' model that moves past the stale 'office vs. home' debate.
Next steps
- Replace the general complaints in section 3 with the "Marcus" story or a similar real-world example.
- Define one specific policy change (the solution) to replace the vague "culture" argument.
- Approve the "Mentorship Loop" headline to refocus the thesis.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Most opinion pieces fail because they are too abstract, too long, or offer nothing but complaints. Editors at top-tier publications like the NYT or WSJ look for specific cinematic storytelling combined with concrete solutions, not general commentary. This skill enforces the professional frameworks used by veteran editors to turn internal monologues into publishable op-eds.
What it does
- Enforces structural elements by ensuring every piece contains a specific story, supporting statistics, and a viable solution.
- Validates publication readiness through a five-question pre-writing audit covering audience, news hooks, and personal authority.
- Optimizes headlines by transforming neutral descriptions into bold, arguable claims that drive clicks and engagement.
- Refines narratives by replacing abstract introductions with cinematic, sensory-driven opening scenes.
- Drafts pitch packages including the full article, alternative headlines, and the "why-you/why-now" email for editors.
How it works
- The Pre-Flight Audit. Provide your topic, and the agent will extract the five essential pillars (Audience, Publication, Authority, News Hook, and Solution) before any writing begins.
- Cinematic Drafting. The agent builds the piece non-linearly, starting with a vivid opening scene and a bold thesis rather than a standard introduction.
- Draft Critique. Submit an existing draft to be scored against professional standards, flagging jargon, strawman arguments, and missing news hooks.
- Final Packaging. The agent trims the output to the 500-800 word sweet spot and generates submission-ready pitch copy.
Frameworks & tools
This skill utilizes the storytelling rules of Nicholas Kristof, Glenn Kramon's three-element framing, and Katie Kingsbury's NYT Opinion guidelines. It is designed for long-form platforms including Substack, LinkedIn, and major newspaper opinion sections.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often produce "high school essay" structures that editors immediately reject. This skill forces a non-linear drafting process and specific structural constraints—like the requirement for a specific character and scene—that mimic the coaching of a professional desk editor.
Use cases
- Drafting a Substack essay that needs a stronger personal narrative.
- Converting a white paper into a punchy LinkedIn long-form article.
- Pitching a timely reaction piece to the New York Times or Wall Street Journal.
- Critiquing a corporate executive's ghostwritten op-ed for tone and jargon.
Known limitations
Does not perform live web research for new statistics. Requires the user to provide the "why-you" lived experience and specific interview data to ensure publication quality.
How to use
Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Free forever
No account required to browse
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 8 days ago
- Free to download with an account