More screenshots

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+22 more

    Offer Consistency Desk

    1

    Compare an offer across supplied ads, email, landing-page and checkout text. Find conflicting terms, preserve valid variants and draft source-backed copy fixes.

    $12

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Offer Consistency Desk

    Offer Consistency Desk

    Example session with this skill installed

    Check this offer. Source: $99/yr after 14-day trial. Asset A (Email): 'Try it for 7 days then just $9 per month'. Asset B (LP): '$99/yr, no trial'. Help me reconcile this.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the offer consistency desk
    • Generated the data export

    I have reviewed the supplied assets against your governing source. There are direct conflicts regarding the trial duration and the billing representation.

    offer-facts.md

    Fact IDFieldGoverning ValueScopeAuthority
    F1Price$99AnnualOwner-confirmed
    F2IntervalYearlyGlobalOwner-confirmed
    F3Trial14 daysNew UsersOwner-confirmed

    consistency-matrix.csv

    check_id,asset_id,field,expected,observed,status,evidence_refs,next_action
    C1,A1,price_monthly,$8.25 (equiv),'$9,CONFLICT,F1;F2,Apply fix
    C2,A1,trial,14 days,7 days,CONFLICT,F3,Apply fix
    C3,B1,trial,14 days,no trial,MISSING,F3,Apply fix

    copy-fixes.md

    Fix C1/C2 (Asset: Email)

    • Before: "Try it for 7 days then just $9 per month"
    • Proposed After: "Try it for 14 days then just $99 per year (only $8.25/mo)"
    • Evidence: F1, F2, F3.

    Fix C3 (Asset: LP)

    • Before: "$99/yr, no trial"
    • Proposed After: "$99/yr after a 14-day free trial"
    • Evidence: F3.

    launch-review.md

    Decision summary: REVISE. 3 conflicts detected.
    Inspected scope: 1 Email (A1), 1 Landing Page (B1).
    Findings: The email uses an incorrect monthly billing rate and shortened trial. The landing page omits the trial entirely.
    Owner decisions: None pending; all fixes mapped to F1-F3.

    Next steps

    1. Update the Email template to reflect the 14-day trial and $99 annual price.
    2. Add the trial disclosure to the Landing Page hero section.
    3. Verify if the $9/mo rate in the email was an old offer that needs decommissioning.

    consistency-matrix.csv

    CSV · data export

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Campaign assets often drift during production. The price on the landing page might not match the checkout, or a trial period in a promotional email might contradict the fine print. This skill compares your campaign assets against your source-of-truth offer facts to find and fix discrepancies before you launch.

    What it does

    • Extracts offer facts by isolating prices, trial terms, dates, and qualifiers from your governing documents.
    • Audits asset consistency by comparing landing pages, emails, and ads against the source-of-truth.
    • Generates a conflict matrix that categorizes issues as mismatches, missing qualifiers, or unverified claims.
    • Drafts precise copy fixes that replace conflicting terms with source-backed text while maintaining the original tone.
    • Normalizes billing terms to ensure annual versus monthly equivalent pricing is calculated and disclosed correctly.

    How it works

    1. Define the boundary by providing the campaign assets, product details, and the governing offer facts.
    2. Review the consistency matrix to see a row-by-row breakdown of every commercial claim across all supplied channels.
    3. Apply the copy patches using the provided before-and-after blocks for each identified conflict.
    4. Finalize owner decisions for any unresolved terms where the source authority was unclear or contradictory.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is framework-agnostic and processes text-based assets. It requires no external APIs or live database access, though it can use file-system tools to save the resulting audit reports and CSV ledgers.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often "hallucinate" the most attractive price or miss subtle qualifiers like time-zone offsets and billing intervals. This skill uses a structured comparison logic that prevents the AI from choosing a price based on a majority vote of drafts, ensuring the governing source always wins.

    Use cases

    • Auditing a SaaS product launch across email, search ads, and pricing tables.
    • Reconciling holiday sale dates and discount codes across regional storefronts.
    • Verifying trial terms and renewal disclosures in checkout flow copy.
    • Checking that monthly equivalents in marketing match annual billing facts.

    Known limitations

    This is a content review tool. It does not perform live checkout testing, tax calculations, legal compliance audits, or visual render checks. Missing source authority requires a manual user decision.

    How to use

    Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 3 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Requires

    Python

    Listed3 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions