The problem

Single-source market analysis often ignores tail risks or macro shifts, leading to confirmation bias. Most analysts struggle to reconcile conflicting signals between technical indicators and fundamental valuations.

What it does

• Coordinates six specialist agent roles: Technicals, Fundamentals, Macro, News, Risk, and Verification.
• Calculates evidence scores (0.0 to 1.0) based on source primary/secondary status and agent confidence levels.
• Applies a formal conflict resolution framework to weigh shorter-term technicals against long-term fundamentals.
• Generates a structured research brief with graded conclusions (A-D) and identified information gaps.
• Filters out unverified claims or anonymous speculation using a dedicated Verification Agent.

Why this beats prompting it yourself

Instead of getting a generic summary, you get a rigorous multi-perspective audit. This skill enforces strict evidence-weighting rules and mathematical confidence scoring that a single-prompt approach lacks. It systematically surfaces contradictions between data sources rather than smoothing them over.

Use cases

• Conducting pre-trade due diligence on equities or crypto assets.
• Synthesizing macro regimes with specific asset price action for portfolio rebalancing.
• Vetting breaking news events against historical fundamentals and technical support levels.
• Identifying tail risks and correlation threats before entering high-conviction positions.

Known limitations

Requires access to external data sources or search tools to populate agent reports effectively. Performance depends on the quality of underlying financial data provided in the context.