meeting action follow up builder

    1

    Converts meeting artifacts into accountable execution records with validated action items, decisions, and risk logs.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    meeting action follow up builder

    Example session with this skill installed

    Process these notes from the API Design Sync. Sarah agreed to update the Swagger docs by Friday. We discussed moving to GraphQL but decided to stick with REST for now due to the timeline.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the meeting action follow
    • Generated the document

    I have processed the API Design Sync notes. I have extracted one commitment and one decision, while identifying a timeline risk.

    Meeting Execution Record

    Meeting Context

    • Title: API Design Sync
    • Participants: Sarah, [Unstated]
    • Source: Raw notes

    Executive Summary
    The team discussed the potential move to GraphQL but ultimately decided to maintain the current REST architecture to meet existing deadlines. Sarah is responsible for updating the Swagger documentation by the end of the week. A timeline risk was identified regarding architectural changes.

    Action Items

    IDDescriptionOwnerDue DateStatusSource
    A-001Update Swagger documentationSarahFridayOpen"Sarah agreed to update the Swagger docs by Friday"

    Decisions

    IDDescriptionRationaleDissentSource
    D-001Stick with REST architectureTimeline constraintsMoving to GraphQL was discussed"decided to stick with REST for now"

    Validation Report

    CheckCriterionStatusDetails
    TraceabilityEvery item has a sourcePASSAll items mapped to text.
    OwnershipExplicit named ownersPASSSarah assigned to A-001.
    TimingExplicit due datesPASSFriday deadline captured.
    DistinctionActions vs DiscussionPASSGraphQL discussion correctly identified as a proposal/decision.

    Follow-Up Message (Draft)
    Hi team, thanks for the sync. We are sticking with REST for now to hit our dates. Sarah will have the Swagger docs updated by Friday. Please confirm if there are any other blockers.

    Next steps

    1. Confirm the specific "Friday" date (e.g., Oct 27th) for A-001.
    2. Review the REST decision if the project timeline is extended.
    3. Identify other participants present but not named in the notes.

    meeting-action-follow-up-builder.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Extract accountable action items with owners and deadlines from transcripts.Generate a formal decision log with rationale and dissent for audit trails.Build a risk register and dependency map from project kickoff notes.Create pre-read context for follow-up meetings from unresolved questions.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Meeting notes and transcripts usually sit in documents where action items lose their owners, deadlines are guessed, and critical decisions lack rationale. Developers and PMs waste time manually parsing messy text into trackers only to realize half the commitments are missing clear accountability.

    What it does

    • Extracts decisions, commitments, owners, and deadlines from raw transcripts or notes.
    • Normalizes every action item with unique IDs, explicit owners, and observable acceptance criteria.
    • Maps dependencies and risks to ensure blockers are identified before they stop progress.
    • Generates a comprehensive validation report to flag missing owners or unstated deadlines.
    • Produces ready-to-use follow-up artifacts including action tables, risk registers, and next-meeting pre-reads.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard LLM prompts often hallucinate deadlines or assign tasks to "the team" when owners aren't specified. This skill enforces a strict verification protocol that distinguishes actual decisions from mere suggestions and requires every output to be traceable back to specific source text.

    Use cases

    • Convert a messy Zoom transcript into a structured Jira-ready action item table.
    • Audit a recorded project kickoff to ensure every risk and dependency was captured.
    • Create a "next-meeting context" document that carries forward unresolved questions and blocked items.
    • Generate a formal decisions log with rationale and dissent for compliance and traceability.

    Known limitations

    Does not perform live facilitation or transcription. Requires existing text-based artifacts like notes, chat logs, or transcripts to function.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 8 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed8 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions