Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+21 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsManuscript Submission Readiness Pack — Journal Preflight Aud
A professional editorial audit for academic manuscripts to detect citation errors, journal non-compliance, and gaps.
$28.99
Manuscript Submission Readiness Pack — Journal Preflight Aud
Example session with this skill installed
Please review my manuscript 'Effects of Compound X on Neural Plasticity' for submission to the Journal of Neuroscience as a Research Article. I've attached the main text and cover letter.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the manuscript submission readiness
I have completed the pre-submission audit for 'Effects of Compound X on Neural Plasticity'. The review identified 2 blockers and 3 high-priority consistency issues regarding the reference list and author affiliations.
Overall Result: ACTION REQUIRED
Submission Readiness Report
| ID | Category | Status | Priority | Evidence/Location | Why it matters | Recommended Action | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ethics | ACTION_REQUIRED | BLOCKER | Section 4.2 | Missing Data Availability Statement. | Add statement describing repository or access. | J. Neurosci Guidelines |
| 002 | Citations | ACTION_REQUIRED | BLOCKER | Page 12, Ref [42] | Reference [42] is listed but not cited in text. | Remove reference or add citation. | Internal Logic |
| 003 | Consistency | AUTHOR_CONFIRM | HIGH | Cover Letter vs Title Page | Corresponding author email differs between documents. | Sync email addresses. | Internal Logic |
| 004 | Inventory | FILE_NOT_PROVIDED | MEDIUM | Fig 1 Callout | Figure 1 is cited but no image file was provided for review. | Upload Figure 1. | Stage 1 Inventory |
| 005 | Formatting | JOURNAL_NOT_VERIFIED | LOW | Abstract | Abstract is 280 words; journal may have 250-word limit. | Verify exact limit. | J. Neurosci (Est) |
Reference Audit
- Total References: 45
- Orphaned Citations: None.
- Uncited References: [42] Miller et al. (2021).
- Formatting: Inconsistent DOI formatting in references [12], [15], and [18].
Declaration Checklist
- Competing Interests: Present.
- Funding Statement: Present.
- Author Contributions: Missing CRediT taxonomy roles.
- Data Availability: Missing.
Next steps
- Insert the Data Availability Statement in the main manuscript.
- Reconcile the corresponding author email address across all submission files.
- Remove or place the citation for reference [42] to fix the numbering sequence.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Manuscripts are often rejected for administrative errors, inconsistent citations, or missing declarations before a peer reviewer even sees them. This skill performs a rigorous pre-submission audit to catch these friction points. It functions as a professional editorial pass, ensuring your submission package aligns with journal-specific guidelines and internal logic.
What it does
- Inventory validation identifies missing figures, tables, supplementary files, or required reporting checklists.
- Journal alignment cross-references the manuscript against specific journal instructions for word counts, section headings, and blinded review rules.
- Citation auditing maps every in-text citation to the reference list to find orphans, duplicates, or malformed DOIs.
- Consistency checking flags discrepancies in author lists, affiliations, and funding statements across the cover letter, title page, and main text.
- Ethics screening reviews the presence of required declarations for data availability, conflicts of interest, and IRB approvals.
How it works
- Scope definition where you provide the manuscript files and the target journal name or author guidelines.
- Requirement verification where the agent identifies specific article-type limits and mandatory submission components.
- Structured analysis covering six distinct stages from structural presentation to cross-document consistency.
- Issue classification using a standardized priority system from
BLOCKERtoINFO.
Frameworks & tools
This skill is designed for researchers and editorial assistants working with LaTeX, Markdown, or docx-extracted text. It follows standard publishing industry workflows for academic and clinical research submissions.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often hallucinate journal rules or miss deep citation mismatches. This skill uses a multi-stage audit logic that forces an inventory check and explicit verification of every claim against the provided documents.
Use cases
- Auditing a high-stakes clinical trial manuscript for CONSORT compliance and ethics statements.
- Ensuring a blinded manuscript is truly anonymized before submitting to a double-blind journal.
- Cleaning up a reference list after a major revision to ensure citation numbering remains intact.
Known limitations
Does not perform scientific, statistical, or legal review. Cannot verify the physical resolution of image files or the authenticity of external references unless tools are provided.
Cannot verify scientific accuracy, image resolution, or external reference authenticity. Requires user-supplied journal guidelines for specific compliance checks.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 24 days ago