Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    Manuscript Disclosure & Submission Readiness Gate Skill

    1

    Pre-screens manuscripts for disclosure gaps, authorship inconsistencies, and journal submission requirement compliance.

    $28.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Manuscript Disclosure & Submission Readiness Gate Skill

    Manuscript Disclosure & Submission Readiness Gate Skill

    Example session with this skill installed

    Please screen my manuscript 'Efficacy of Compound X' for submission to the Journal of Clinical Medicine. I have attached the main text, title page, and the journal's author guidelines PDF.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the manuscript disclosure

    The manuscript 'Efficacy of Compound X' has been screened against the Journal of Clinical Medicine (JCM) submission guidelines. Materials reviewed include the Main Text (v2), Title Page, and JCM Author Instructions (updated Oct 2023).

    Executive Status: ACTION REQUIRED

    Disclosure and Consistency Audit

    IDCategoryStatusPriorityEvidence/LocationWhy it MattersRecommended Action
    001AuthorshipACTION_REQUIREDBLOCKERTitle Page vs. MetadataDr. A. Smith is listed on title page but missing from CRediT statement.Add Dr. Smith to the Author Contributions section.
    002EthicsAUTHOR_CONFIRMATIONHIGHMethods, Para 4IRB number (2023-XY) is present but institution name is missing.Provide the name of the approving Ethics Committee.
    003DisclosuresREADYINFODeclarations SectionFunding (Grant #123) matches title page acknowledgments.No action needed.
    004AI UseJOURNAL_RULE_UNVERIFIEDMEDIUMMain TextJCM requires specific AI disclosure text if used; none found in text.Confirm if LLMs were used for writing or data analysis.
    005FormattingACTION_REQUIREDMEDIUMAbstractCurrent abstract is 310 words; JCM limit is 250 words.Trim abstract by 60 words to meet journal constraints.

    Cross-File Consistency Findings

    • Author List: Mismatch found. Title page lists 4 authors; CRediT statement lists 3 authors.
    • Funding: Consistent. Grant ID #123 matches across Cover Letter and Main Text.

    Data Availability: The manuscript mentions a Zenodo repository, but the DOI link is currently a placeholder (10.000/placeholder).

    Next steps

    1. Update the Author Contributions section to include Dr. A. Smith.
    2. Reduce the abstract word count to under 250 words to avoid administrative return.
    3. Insert the final Zenodo DOI in the Data Availability Statement before uploading to the portal.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Manuscripts often get rejected or returned before peer review due to administrative gaps, missing disclosures, or metadata inconsistencies. This skill functions as a pre-submission gate, auditing your research papers against journal-specific requirements and ethics standards to prevent avoidable desk rejections.

    What it does

    • Authorship Audit identifies mismatches in affiliations, corresponding author details, and CRediT contribution statements across all files.
    • Disclosure Mapping verifies the presence and consistency of conflict of interest, funding, and AI-use declarations.
    • Ethics Validation flags missing IRB approval identifiers, informed consent statements, and clinical trial registration details.
    • Consistency Checking compares data availability statements against manuscript claims to ensure internal alignment.
    • Requirement Verification audits the submission package against specific journal word limits, blinded file rules, and reporting checklists.

    How it works

    1. Provide the manuscript text, title page, and the target journal name or its specific author guidelines.
    2. The agent analyzes the provided documents to map existing declarations and identify missing mandatory sections.
    3. It performs cross-file verification to ensure names and funding details match between the cover letter and the main text.
    4. You receive a prioritized report categorizing findings by severity, from informational notes to submission blockers.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill utilizes CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) for authorship mapping and standard reporting guidelines like CONSORT or PRISMA when journals require them.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often hallucinate ethics approvals or miss subtle inconsistencies between a cover letter and a supplemental file. This skill uses a strict status hierarchy and an integrity-first logic that refuses to fabricate missing data, ensuring you only submit verified, compliant information.

    Use cases

    • Screening a draft before final submission to a high-impact journal like Nature or Lancet.
    • Auditing a multi-author manuscript for consistent CRediT roles and funding acknowledgments.
    • Verifying blinded manuscript files for double-blind peer review compliance.
    • Checking clinical trial registration and protocol compliance against journal specificities.

    Known limitations

    Does not assess scientific merit or predict acceptance. Cannot verify the factual truth of declarations or obtain missing IRB approvals. Journal-specific rules are only verified if guidelines are provided.

    Does not assess scientific merit. Cannot verify factual truth of author claims. Journal-specific rules marked NOT_CHECKED if instructions are not provided.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 24 days ago

    Permissions

    Terminal / Shell
    Read Files
    Listed24 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill serves as a final administrative check to identify missing ethics statements, CRediT role mismatches, or formatting violations that lead to immediate desk rejections, saving you weeks of back-and-forth with journal editors.

    The skill is designed to work within leading AI agent platforms that support multi-document processing; you simply need to upload your manuscript files and the journal's specific guidelines to begin the audit.

    The skill performs cross-file verification, checking for inconsistencies between your title page, main manuscript, and cover letter to ensure names, affiliations, and funding IDs are identical across all documents.

    You will receive the core pre-submission logic, a prioritized report template, and pre-configured modules for verifying CRediT roles and standard ethics disclosures (IRB, AI-use, and COI).

    While the skill includes standard reporting guidelines (like PRISMA or CONSORT), it performs best when you provide the specific Author Guidelines URL or PDF for your target journal to ensure it checks against their exact word counts and blinding rules.

    No, this skill is focused on administrative and ethical compliance; it does not evaluate the scientific methodology, data quality, or the likelihood of acceptance based on research impact.

    New in Technical Documentation