Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    logo design feedback

    4

    Professional logo critique with a weighted scorecard, 5 stress tests and a hard verdict - by an award-winning designer (150+ contest wins).

    Free

    7 installs5.0 (4 reviews)
    logo design feedback

    logo design feedback

    Example session with this skill installed

    Review this logo for "Fajr Coffee", a specialty coffee roastery targeting young professionals. The logo: the word FAJR in a thin geometric sans-serif, letter-spaced wide, in a copper gradient, above a line-art coffee cup whose steam forms a crescent moon, all inside a thin circular badge.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the logo design feedback
    • Generated the UI component

    Logo Review: Fajr Coffee
    What I see: A combination mark: a wide-tracked, thin geometric sans-serif wordmark "FAJR" in a copper gradient, set above a fine line-art coffee cup whose steam curls into a crescent moon, the whole composition enclosed in a thin circular badge outline.

    Scorecard
    Criterion Weight Score Note
    Memorability 20% 7/10 The steam-to-crescent idea is genuinely ownable and ties "fajr" (dawn) to coffee ritual - but it competes with the badge for attention.
    Simplicity 15% 5/10 Three layers (badge + cup + wordmark) where one idea should lead; the badge adds nothing the crescent doesn't already say.
    Relevance 15% 8/10 Crescent/dawn concept fits the name and the morning-coffee ritual perfectly; copper suits roasted coffee tones.
    Scalability 15% 4/10 Thin line art + thin type + thin badge = three hairline systems that all collapse below 48px.
    Timelessness 10% 5/10 Thin-line badge logos were the 2015-2020 craft uniform; the gradient dates it further.
    Distinctiveness 15% 6/10 The crescent-steam is distinctive, but the badge format is the default costume of every craft roastery.
    Execution 10% 7/10 Wide tracking is even and the composition is balanced; gradient direction fights the steam's upward flow.
    Total: (7×2)+(5×1.5)+(8×1.5)+(4×1.5)+(5×1)+(6×1.5)+(7×1) = 59.5/100

    Stress tests
    16px test: FAIL - all three hairline systems merge; nothing survives at favicon size.
    One-color test: FAIL - the copper gradient is doing the separation between cup and badge; in flat black they fuse.
    Glance test: PASS - the crescent steam reads within two seconds.
    Sketch test: PASS - "a cup whose steam is a crescent moon" is drawable from memory.
    Context test: FAIL - in a lineup of specialty roasters, thin-badge line art is the category wallpaper.
    The biggest problem
    The logo buries its one great idea. The crescent-steam is a genuinely ownable concept, but it is trapped inside a generic badge, drawn in hairlines, and competing with a gradient - three fashionable layers that hide the idea, kill small-size use, and make the brand look like every 2018 craft roastery. Commercially, that means an app icon and social avatar that read as a gray smudge, and zero shelf separation.

    Recommended revisions (in priority order)
    Delete the circular badge entirely. Let the cup-and-crescent mark stand alone; lock up with the wordmark beside or below it.
    Redraw the mark in a single bold weight (roughly 8-10% of mark height as stroke width) so it survives at 16px and in one color.
    Replace the copper gradient with one flat copper plus a black version; gradients stay only for packaging art, never in the mark.
    Swap the thin wordmark for a medium-weight geometric sans with normal tracking; keep wide tracking only for large-format use.
    Create the small-size variant now: crescent-steam mark alone, no wordmark, as favicon/app icon.
    Verdict: Rethink the concept
    The core idea deserves to ship, but the execution system around it fails two stress tests and belongs to a dated category uniform. Rebuild the same concept in one bold weight, flat color, no badge - that version would likely score in the mid-80s.

    logo-design-feedback.tsx

    TSX · React component

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Most AI logo feedback is vague flattery: "great colors, maybe simplify it a bit!" This skill replaces that with the process real contest judges and senior identity designers actually use.

    It was built by an award-winning logo designer with 150+ design contest wins, 470+ runner-up finishes and 11 years of client work - the exact evaluation framework used to judge thousands of real logos, packaged as a skill for your agent.

    What your agent delivers:

    A weighted scorecard - 7 professional criteria (memorability, simplicity, relevance, scalability, timelessness, distinctiveness & trademark risk, execution), each scored 1-10 with evidence, totaled out of 100 with verifiable math. 5 real-world stress tests - the 16px favicon test, the one-color test, the 2-second glance test, the sketch-from-memory test, and the competitor lineup test. PASS/FAIL each, with reasons. The single biggest problem - the one issue that most limits the logo commercially, not a list of nitpicks. 3-5 prioritized revisions - concrete enough to hand straight to a designer ("switch to a single bold weight, ~8-10% of mark height" - never "improve the typography"). A hard verdict - Ship it / Revise then ship / Rethink the concept. No polite fence-sitting. Also handles head-to-head comparisons: submit 2+ logo candidates and get a side-by-side score table with a declared winner.

    Who it's for:

    Founders choosing between logo options or validating a marketplace/contest purchase Indie hackers who generated a logo with AI and want to know if it's actually good Designers who want a structured second opinion before presenting to a client Agencies triaging logo drafts at scale What's inside: SKILL.md with a strict 8-step workflow and output format, a full scoring rubric with per-criterion anchors and an industry-cliché list, the 5 stress tests with pass/fail conditions, and two complete example reviews (single critique + comparison) that set the quality bar.

    Text-only skill: no scripts, no network calls, no permissions needed. Tested on multiple agents (Claude, Gemini) with consistent scores and verdicts.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    5.0
    4 reviews
    5
    4
    4
    0
    3
    0
    2
    0
    1
    0

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 3 days ago

    • Free to download with an account

    Listed3 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions