inclusive learning material auditor
Audit and optimize educational materials for accessibility, inclusivity, and diverse learner personas.
$5
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+21 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsinclusive learning material auditor
Example session with this skill installed
Audit this 5th-grade math word problem for a diverse urban classroom: 'John's parents gave him $50 for the country club snack bar. If a burger costs $8.50, how many can he buy for his friends?'
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the inclusive learning material
I have audited the math word problem for inclusivity and accessibility. While the mathematical operation is clear, the context contains significant socioeconomic and cultural barriers for an urban classroom setting.
Inclusive Learning Material Audit
Material: 5th Grade Math Word Problem (Division/Budgeting)
Audience: 5th Grade / Urban Classroom / Diverse Socioeconomic Backgrounds
Overall Score: 2/5 (High Participation and Cultural Barriers)
Six-Axis Diagnostic
| Axis | Score | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Language | 4/5 | Simple sentence structure; clear goal. |
| Representation | 2/5 | Assumes access to exclusive spaces (country club). |
| Cognitive Load | 5/5 | Single-step operation; low extraneous load. |
| Participation | 1/5 | Relies on wealth-based relatability. |
| Cultural Bias | 2/5 | Assumes familiarity with snack bar pricing/norms. |
| Accommodation Gaps | 5/5 | Text is short and easily accessible to screen readers. |
Prioritized Corrections
HIGH
- Participation Barrier: Socioeconomic Exclusion
Original: "John's parents gave him $50 for the country club snack bar. If a burger costs $8.50..."
Correction: "Amina saved $50 to buy supplies for the community garden. If a bag of soil costs $8.50, how many bags can she buy?"
Intent preserved: Tests division with decimals and remainders in a budgeting context.
MEDIUM
- Representation: Naming Patterns
Original: "John's parents..."
Correction: Use diverse naming and varied family structures or independent agency.
LOW
- Ensure currency symbols are explained if students are new to USD contexts.
Persona Validation
Persona A — ELL Student (Level 3): Pass. The vocabulary in the rewrite (garden, soil, bag) is more universal than "country club."
Persona B — Student from Low-Income Household: Pass. The new context centers community contribution rather than exclusive leisure spending, removing the "outsider" feeling.
Persona C — Student with ADHD: Pass. The prompt remains concise and the task is clearly defined at the end of the text.
Remaining Risks
None. The mathematical rigor is maintained while the barrier to entry is lowered.
Next steps
- Update the problem set with the "community garden" version.
- Review remaining problems in this unit for similar wealth-based assumptions.
- Check if students require physical counters for the decimal division.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Educational content often contains hidden barriers that exclude learners based on cultural background, disability, or socioeconomic status. Most automated checkers miss subtle biases, cognitive overloads, and unstated assumptions that prevent students from demonstrating mastery.
What it does
- Evaluates materials across six critical axes including cognitive load, cultural bias, and accommodation gaps.
- Scores content on a 1-5 scale with specific evidence citations for every diagnostic finding.
- Provides concrete, side-by-side rewrites for high-severity issues to ensure instructional goals remain intact.
- Validates proposed fixes against three distinct learner personas to catch remaining edge-case barriers.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
General LLMs often provide vague feedback like "use simpler words" without considering how changes impact learning objectives. This skill forces a rigorous multi-axis inspection and persona-based walkthrough that ensures accessibility doesn't sacrifice academic rigor.
Use cases
- Auditing K-12 worksheets or textbook chapters before classroom distribution.
- Reviewing localized course modules for unstated cultural assumptions or idioms.
- Checking video scripts and slide decks for visual/auditory accommodation gaps.
- Evaluating marketplace-bound educational products for universal design standards.
Known limitations
Does not perform fact-checking for subject matter accuracy or basic grammar/spell-checking. Requires the user to provide or confirm audience context to avoid generic Western-centric assumptions.
Does not fact-check subject matter or perform basic copy-editing. Requires audience metadata (age, grade, context) to produce accurate cultural and linguistic audits.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected