审查插画风格 · Illustration Style Reviewer

它解决什么问题

插画风格不一致是品牌资产的隐形杀手:同一个产品里,有的插图扁平、有的 3D、有的线条粗、有的颜色艳,用户一眼就觉得「这不是一个东西」。这个技能把主观的「感觉怪怪的」变成可核对的评审清单,逐项给证据和改法,让评审从玄学变成标准动作。

这个技能做什么

围绕插画风格评审提供结构化能力:先澄清插画的使用场景、受众与品牌调性,再按线条、配色、构图、人物比例、隐喻表达和成套延展性逐项检查,输出问题分级(必须改/建议改/可选)与具体修改方向,最后给一套可交给画师的风格规范,避免反复返稿。

为什么比裸提示词强

• 内嵌一致性清单:线条粗细、色板、透视、留白、隐喻密度逐项核对
• 结论先行:先给「风格是否成立」的结论,再给证据与改法
• 不只挑错还给规范:输出可直接发给画师的风格指南
• 不确定处标「待确认」,不会硬凑专业术语装懂

典型用例

• 品牌换了新插画供应商,需要评审第一批作品是否跑偏
• 产品里的插画新旧混杂,需要定位哪些必须重画
• 给新画师写风格规范,减少反复返稿
• 竞品调研后,想明确自家插画风格的差异化方向

局限

评审基于描述或图片参考给出建议,无法替代专业美术总监的最终判断;涉及素材版权与来源,请自行确认。

English · 英文介绍

The problem

Inconsistent illustration styles are a hidden killer of brand equity: for the same product, some illustrations are flat, some are 3D, some have thick lines, and some are brightly colored. Users will feel at a glance that "this is not the same thing." This skill turns the subjective "feeling weird" into a checkable review list, providing evidence and modified methods one by one, turning the review from metaphysics into standard actions.

What it does

Provide structured capabilities around the illustration style review: first clarify the usage scenario, audience and brand tone of the illustration, then check line, color, composition, character proportions, metaphorical expression and complete set of ductility, output problem classification (required/recommended/optional) and specific modification directions, and finally provide a set of style specifications that can be handed over to the artist to avoid repeated submissions.

Why is it better than naked prompt words?

• Built-in consistency checklist: line thickness, color palette, perspective, white space, metaphor density, check item by item
• Conclusion first: first give a conclusion on "whether the style is valid", and then give evidence and modifications
• Not only faults but also specifications: output a style guide that can be sent directly to the artist
• If you are unsure, please mark it as "to be confirmed". You will not pretend to understand by using professional terminology.

Typical use cases

• The brand has changed to a new illustration supplier and needs to review whether the first batch of works are off track.
• The illustrations in the product are a mix of old and new, so you need to identify which ones need to be redrawn.
• Write style specifications for new artists to reduce repeated submissions
• After conducting competitive product research, I want to clarify the differentiation direction of my own illustration style.

Limitations

The reviewers give suggestions based on descriptions or picture references and cannot replace the final judgment of a professional art director. Please confirm by yourself when it comes to material copyright and source.