grant proposal builder

    1

    Transforms project data and funder guidelines into evidence-backed grant proposals with multi-pass validation.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    grant proposal builder

    Example session with this skill installed

    Analyze our community garden project notes and the attached 'GreenCity Foundation' guidelines. Map our evidence to their criteria and identify missing info for a $50k request.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the grant proposal builder

    I have analyzed the project notes against the GreenCity Foundation guidelines.

    Grant Opportunity Assessment: GreenCity Urban Agriculture Fund

    Funding Case Summary

    Project: Community Garden Expansion
    Applicant: Northside Neighborhood Assoc (501c3)
    Funder: GreenCity Foundation
    Request: $50,000 | Duration: 12 months
    Recommendation: Proceed to draft. The strategic fit is strong, but budget documentation is currently "Partial".

    Eligibility & Strategic Fit

    RequirementEvidenceStatusRisk
    501(c)(3) StatusS1: 2023 Tax LetterMetLow
    Geographic ScopeS2: Project map (North District)MetLow
    Match (20%)User note: $10k in-kindPotentially MetNeeds valuation basis

    Strategic Fit: Strong (Population alignment is 100% focused on low-income urban tracts specified in funder priorities).

    Evidence and Requirement Map

    Funder QuestionAvailable ProofSourceCoverage
    Need StatementS3: 2024 Food Security SurveyS3Direct
    Evaluation PlanNotes on 'attendance'S2Partial (Lacks behavioral impact)

    Missing Information & Priority Actions

    1. Critical: Detailed calculation for the $10,000 in-kind match (required for eligibility).
    2. Recommended: Baseline data for the 'behavioral change' outcome (how many currently grow food?).

    Proposed Theory of Change

    Need (Food Desert) -> Activities (Garden Workshops) -> Outputs (20 plots) -> Outcome (Increased fresh produce intake) -> Impact (Improved community health)

    Validation Report

    • Traceability: 85% (Need stats and tax status verified; match funding unverified).
    • Consistency: Budget request ($50k) matches the narrative scope.
    • Readiness: Ready with minor edits (Pending match documentation).

    Next steps

    • Provide the basis for the $10k in-kind valuation (labor hours or land value).
    • Confirm the specific survey methodology for the Food Security Survey (S3).
    • Review the drafted Need Statement in the next section.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Grant writing often fails due to misaligned funder requirements, weak evidence traceability, or internal contradictions between the project narrative and the budget. Developers and organizations waste hours manually mapping fragmented notes and data to rigid application frameworks.

    What it does

    • Performs a structured eligibility and strategic fit assessment against specific funder guidelines.
    • Builds a requirement-to-evidence matrix mapping organizational proof to application questions.
    • Constructs a formal causal chain linking community need to activities, outputs, and measurable outcomes.
    • Conducts a multi-pass validation for budget consistency, traceability of claims, and unsupported assumptions.
    • Generates a source-registered proposal draft with clear labels for verified facts versus estimates.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often hallucinate statistics or invent organizational history to fill gaps. This skill enforces a source register and multi-pass validation logic, ensuring every claim is backed by identified evidence or explicitly flagged as a placeholder.

    Use cases

    • Assessing project eligibility and competitive fit for new grant opportunities.
    • Identifying critical evidence gaps in existing project documentation before drafting.
    • Auditing draft proposals for budget-to-narrative consistency and measurable SMART targets.
    • Transforming raw program notes and budget spreadsheets into funder-aligned narratives.

    Known limitations

    Cannot verify the truth of user-provided sources. Submission readiness is a recommendation only and does not guarantee funding.

    Requires manual input of funder guidelines or URLs. Cannot independently verify the truth of provided evidence or organizational facts. Final submission remains the user's responsibility.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 2 months ago

    Permissions

    No special permissions declared or detected

    Listed2 months ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The skill uses a multi-pass validation logic that cross-references your budget data with your project narrative, flagging any internal contradictions or claims that lack supporting evidence from your source documents.

    You will receive the core Grant Proposal Builder workflow, a template for the requirement-to-evidence matrix, and documentation on how to structure your source registers for the best results.

    This skill is designed to work with major LLM-based agents (like ChatGPT, Claude, or custom API-driven workflows) that support document uploads and long-context processing for detailed project data.

    Updates are typically released to improve alignment with evolving funder frameworks and to optimize the validation logic; buyers receive lifetime access to all future versions of this specific skill.

    No, the skill relies entirely on the project data and funder guidelines you provide, ensuring it only uses your specific organizational evidence rather than generic or hallucinated information.

    While it automates the alignment and drafting process, the skill cannot verify the external truth of your source documents or guarantee funding, as final approval rests with the grant-making body.

    New in Finance & Accounting