Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    Git History Archaeologist pro

    1

    Specialized Git forensics for tracing code evolution, detecting reverts, and reconstructing commit narratives.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned
    Git History Archaeologist pro

    Git History Archaeologist pro

    Example session with this skill installed

    Analyze file auth_service.py from line 45 to 60. I need to know why the token validation logic changed and if the previous security check was fully removed or just moved elsewhere.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the git history archaeologist
    • Generated the document

    The investigation reveals that the token validation logic was modified to support OAuth2 scopes, and the original security check was moved to a middleware component rather than deleted.

    Git History Forensic Report

    Repository Scope

    auth_service.py (Lines 45-60)

    Timeline

    DateCommitEventEvidenceConfidence
    2023-10-12a1b2c3dIntroductionInitial validation logic added.High
    2024-01-15e5f6g7hModificationLogic changed to support Scopes.High
    2024-01-15e5f6g7hRefactorOriginal check moved to middleware/auth.py.Medium
    2024-03-02i9j0k1lCurrent StateCurrent implementation with bug fix i9j0k1l.High

    Blame Findings

    Line/RangeBlame CommitAuthorDateEvidenceFollow-up
    45-52e5f6g7hdev_alpha2024-01-15Diff shows scope check insertion.i9j0k1l
    53-60a1b2c3ddev_beta2023-10-12Original error handling remains.None

    Narrative Reconstruction

    The logic at line 45 was altered in e5f6g7h to introduce scope-based authorization. The previous check, which validated raw token strings, was not deleted but refactored into a shared middleware utility to prevent duplication. However, the current implementation in auth_service.py lacks the explicit null-check present in the original version, which may be the source of recent reported issues.

    Next steps

    1. Run git show e5f6g7h:middleware/auth.py to verify the logic was preserved correctly.
    2. Compare the diff of a1b2c3d vs e5f6g7h to confirm the removal of the null-pointer guard.
    3. Check git log -S "validate_token" to see if other files were affected by this refactor.

    git-history-archaeologist-pro.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Identify the exact commit that introduced a specific regression.Trace code moves across different files and directories.Verify if a commit message accurately reflects the changes in its diff.Recover deleted implementations by locating their last known commit.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Git blame is a starting point, not a complete story. Developers often struggle to understand why code changed, where a deleted function went, or whether a past bug fix was accidentally reverted during a messy merge.

    What it does

    • Traces line origins across renames, refactors, and complex move operations.
    • Detects hidden reverts by comparing patches and commit relationships rather than just searching for keywords.
    • Reconstructs chronological narratives for features or bugs to distinguish between facts and interpretations.
    • Analyzes merge history to identify conflict resolutions and corrective commits.
    • Audits commit messages against actual diff evidence to flag discrepancies.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    General LLMs often hallucinate commit hashes or invent author intent to satisfy a prompt. This skill enforces strict evidence-based forensics, explicitly separating facts from hypotheses and grading every finding with a confidence score.

    Use cases

    • Pinpointing exactly when and how a regression was introduced during a specific sprint.
    • Recovering lost logic by tracing deleted code to its last known stable state.
    • Performing due diligence on suspicious commits or legacy code blocks with no documentation.

    Known limitations

    Requires read access to Git logs, diffs, or blame data. It cannot infer author intent or deployment status without explicit repository evidence.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 6 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed6 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions