Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsEvidence Verification Pro — Check Whether Claims Are
Audit exact claim-evidence relationships for support, scope, dates, provenance, source independence, quantitative accuracy and remaining uncertainty.
$9.99
Evidence Verification Pro — Check Whether Claims Are
Example session with this skill installed
Illustrative scenario: Claim: “Our new onboarding program doubled retention and caused the improvement.” Supplied internal note: 10 of 20 participants remained after six months this year; 5 of 20 remained in a prior cohort. No comparison method or control group is provided. Verify the claim from this evidence only.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the evidence verification pro
Atomic claim 1: Retention doubled between the supplied cohorts.
Calculation: Current 10/20 = 50%; prior 5/20 = 25%. Relative ratio = 2; difference = 25 percentage points.
Verdict: Numerically supported for the supplied counts, conditional on comparable cohort definitions and measurement periods. Independent data verification has not occurred.
Atomic claim 2: The onboarding program caused the improvement.
Verdict: Insufficient evidence. Two cohort counts alone do not rule out selection, staffing, timing or other changes. No control or causal method supplied.
Source/provenance: Supplied internal note only. Source date, underlying records and approval status are unknown. It is not independent confirmation.
Corrected wording: “In the supplied cohorts, six-month retention was 50% versus 25% previously, a 25-percentage-point increase. The data do not establish that onboarding caused the difference.”
Missing evidence: Consistent population and retention definitions, underlying cohort records, relevant contextual changes, uncertainty assessment and a defensible evaluation design.
Reverification path: Validate counts and comparable scope, then assess causal evidence using an appropriate method and qualified review.
Limits: No external sources searched, private records accessed, causal effect estimated or consensus claimed.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Evidence Verification Pro helps teams evaluate whether sources actually establish a claim. It decomposes compound assertions, identifies the required evidence, traces primary versus derivative sources, checks supporting passages and compares scope, dates, population and geography.
The skill detects citation mismatch, circular sourcing, causal overclaims, denominator errors and conflicts. Claim-evidence ledgers state a reasoned verdict, confidence, missing evidence and a reverification path. A citation’s presence does not prove support, and repeated reporting is not independent confirmation.
Works in ChatGPT and Claude with supplied material or actual authorized research tools. It never invents sources, access or consensus. Missing support is not automatically proof of falsehood; judgments stay limited to available evidence and qualified review for consequential domains.
How to use
Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 7 days ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install