EU AI Act Compliance Engine: Enterprise Risk Audit Matrix

The problem

Navigating the EU AI Act is complex, and generic AI advice often misses specific regulatory requirements. Manually mapping AI system functions to Annexes and Articles risks legal exposure and missing mandatory technical documentation requirements.

What it does

• Maps system functions against Article 5 prohibited practices and Annex III High-Risk categories.
• Generates a granular Risk Classification Matrix with 50 to 100 word technical justifications per cell.
• Provides a numbered list of mandatory Technical and Organizational Measures (TOMs) with exact Article citations.
• Produces a phase by phase implementation roadmap and Mermaid.js logic flows for compliance architecture.
• Drafts professional escalation memos tailored to specific stakeholders like C-suite or legal teams.

Frameworks & tools

Web Browsing for latest regulatory updates, Data Analysis for risk weighting, and Mermaid.js for compliance flowcharts.

Why this beats prompting it yourself

This skill enforces strict constraints against truncation and "lazy" placeholders, ensuring every claim is substantiated with specific Article and Annex citations. It moves beyond high level summaries to provide a technical blueprint that functions as a defensible regulatory audit.

Use cases

• Conducting pre-market compliance audits for healthcare diagnostic tools.
• Assessing HR and recruitment AI systems against Annex III employment regulations.
• Generating technical documentation requirements for high autonomy industrial robotics.
• Preparing board ready risk posture reports for new AI product launches.

Known limitations

Requires specific inputs including System Function, Industry Sector, and AI Autonomy Level to function. The audit is based on the EU AI Act framework and does not cover US or Asian regulations.