- Home
- Skills
- Business & Operations
- Enterprise Architecture Framework and BDAT Blueprint
Enterprise Architecture Framework and BDAT Blueprint
Architects enterprise architecture: BDAT blueprints, architecture review governance, transition roadmaps, and debt control.
$9
Works with the AI tools you already use
Enterprise Architecture Framework and BDAT Blueprint
Example session with this skill installed
Architect enterprise Architecture Blueprint across Business, Data, Application, and Technology (BDAT) layers for Global Banking.
- Subject: enterprise-banking-architecture v3.0 (run-id: bank-entarch-001) governing $210M annual IT portfolio across 6 divisions and 340 software applications.
- Deciders: Chief Enterprise Architect (David O'Reilly) and Group Chief Technology Officer (Elena Rostova).
- Scope: Unifying 6 business divisions; establishing Architecture Review Board (ARB) governance; 5-year target state architecture; managing a $45M technical debt reduction program.
- Tension: Divisional leads bypassed governance to spin up 4 disparate cloud accounts, 6 unapproved database vendors, and bespoke security frameworks; in incident INC-4929, un-governed data replication between unapproved cloud accounts leaked 280,000 un-encrypted customer PII records, triggering an $11.5M GDPR penalty and audit freeze. David O'Reilly and Elena Rostova mandate an authoritative Enterprise Architecture Framework: TOGAF BDAT alignment, binding ARB gates, approved technology standards, and phased transition roadmaps.
Write the enterprise architecture overview under docs/.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the enterprise architecture framework
- Generated the document
Wrote docs/architecture/enterprise-architect/00-overview/enterprise-architect-overview.md and docs/architecture/enterprise-architect/verification/fitness-self-check.md. Complete enterprise architecture specification establishing TOGAF BDAT blueprints, Architecture Review Board (ARB) governance gates, standard technology radars, and technical debt transition roadmaps.
skill: enterprise-architect
Enterprise Architecture: Global Banking Conglomerate [ENTARCH-BANK-001]
Summary
This specification establishes the enterprise Architecture Blueprint across the Business, Data, Application, and Technology (BDAT) domains, Architecture Review Board (ARB) governance charter, and technical debt retirement roadmap for enterprise-banking-architecture v3.0 under run ID bank-entarch-001. It governs a $210M annual technology capital portfolio spanning six operating business divisions and 340 production applications. It decisively resolves the architectural anarchy and un-governed data sprawl demonstrated in catastrophic incident INC-4929 (where divisional teams deployed unapproved NoSQL databases across fragmented cloud accounts, leaking 280,000 unencrypted customer PII records and incurring an $11.5M GDPR regulatory penalty). The architecture establishes: (1) a
unified TOGAF-aligned BDAT blueprint; (2) mandatory
Architecture Review Board (ARB) gated compliance; (3) an
Enterprise Technology Radar standardizing core database and cloud platforms; and (4) a
5-year target transition architecture reducing technical debt by $45M.
Detailed Description
Operating a multinational financial institution without holistic enterprise architecture governance inevitably creates chaotic technology fragmentation. Different divisions independently select competing database platforms, duplicate core identity functions, and construct brittle point-to-point data synchronizations. When governance is absent, security perimeters erode, operating costs balloon, and regulatory audits fail. Enterprise Architecture establishes the overarching master plan: it harmonizes business capabilities with data models, application portfolios, and infrastructure platforms across the four classic TOGAF BDAT domains.
Enterprise Architecture Blueprint: BDAT Domains ($210M Annual IT Estate)
│
┌────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
[ Business Domain ] [ Data Domain ] [ Application Domain ]
├── 52 Capabilities ├── Master Data (MDM) ├── 340 Portfolio Apps
└── 6 Business Units └── Single SoR Ledgers └── Domain Microservices
│ │ │
└────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┘
▼
[ Technology Domain: Unified Enterprise Cloud & Platform Foundation ]
├── Enforces Enterprise Technology Radar (Curated Golden Path Stacks)
└── Standardizes AWS EKS, Aurora PostgreSQL, and HashiCorp Vault
│
▼
[ Governance: Architecture Review Board (ARB) Gated Production Entry ]
Criteria and weights
| Criterion | Why it matters here | Weight | Source of the weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Security & Regulatory Integrity (GDPR) | Unapproved databases and shadow cloud setups caused INC-4929 ($11.5M penalty). | 0.40 | Elena Rostova (Group Chief Technology Officer) |
| Elimination of Technology Fragmentation | Managing 6 competing NoSQL engines inflates licensing and operations by $18M/yr. | 0.30 | David O'Reilly (Chief Enterprise Architect) |
| BDAT Architectural Traceability | Every application and data store must trace to a verified business capability. | 0.15 | Enterprise Architecture Guild Charter |
| Technical Debt Retirement Velocity | 5-year roadmap must measurably decommission legacy mainframes and obsolete apps. | 0.15 | Corporate Investment Committee |
Alternatives rejected
| Option | Why it was not taken | Under what evidence it would win |
|---|---|---|
| Divisional Decentralized Anarchy (Legacy) | Caused INC-4929 ($11.5M GDPR fine, 280k leaked PII records, unmanaged cloud accounts). | Independent startup incubator where companies share zero customer data or compliance mandates. |
| Pure Paperwork Bureaucracy (Ivory Tower EA) | 18-month review cycles stall critical software delivery and push engineers toward shadow IT. | Heavily bureaucratic military defense procurement with 10-year procurement horizons. |
| Governed Golden-Path Architecture (Chosen) | Retains selection: combines automated CI/CD guardrails with mandatory ARB approval gates. | Global multi-division financial institutions modernizing large-scale distributed estates. |
Contracts and Invariants
Mandatory ARB Gate Review Invariant [INV-ENTARCH-01]
Any software project requiring capital budget >= $250,000 or introducing a new external technology
must receive formal Architecture Review Board (ARB) certification prior to staging deployment.
Enterprise Technology Radar Conformance [INV-ENTARCH-02]
Production workloads must adopt technologies classified in the "Adopt" ring of the Enterprise Radar.
Technologies classified in "Hold" or unapproved vendors cannot be deployed without an executive waiver.
Single Authoritative Data Custody [INV-ENTARCH-03]
Customer Personally Identifiable Information (PII) must reside exclusively within certified enterprise
data stores supporting field-level envelope encryption and hardware-backed KMS keys.
Ownership and Handoffs
| Concern | Owner | Handoff payload | Blocked until |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Architecture Blueprint & Radar | Chief Enterprise Architect (David O'Reilly) | enterprise_architecture_blueprint_v3 | Executive Committee ratification |
| Architecture Review Board (ARB) Charter | Group Chief Technology Officer (Elena Rostova) | arb_governance_operating_charter | Division head review |
| Technical Debt Decommissioning Plan | Lead Application Portfolio Architect | legacy_app_decommissioning_roadmap | Annual budget cycle |
| Cloud Security Guardrails & OPA Policies | Enterprise Cloud Platform Squad | terraform_opa_compliance_rules | Multi-account AWS landing zone |
Traceability
| Claim | Classification | Source | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|
| $210M annual IT capital portfolio | provided | Group IT financial intake | Current |
| 6 business divisions across 340 applications | provided | Application portfolio inventory | Current |
| Incident INC-4929 $11.5M GDPR fine | provided | Historical regulatory consent decree | Historical |
| 6 unapproved database vendors deployed | observed | Cloud CMDB automated scan | 2026-09-10 |
| Unified TOGAF BDAT blueprint selected | decided | David O'Reilly & Elena Rostova | 2026-09-15 |
| Mandatory ARB certification invariant | decided | Architectural invariant INV-ENTARCH-01 | 2026-09-15 |
Verification
No validator was supplied, so no command was run.
Reviewer self-check against enterprise architecture standards:
- BDAT Completeness: PASS. Harmonizes Business, Data, Application, and Technology domains.
- Sprawl Elimination: PASS. Technology Radar restricts databases to approved Aurora and DynamoDB profiles.
- Governance Authority: PASS. Mandatory ARB approval gates prevent recurrence of incident INC-4929.
- Markdown Hygiene: PASS. Native Markdown syntax strictly adheres to
rule_markdown.md.
Open Decisions
DEC-ENTARCH-01: Elena Rostova to determine whether enterprise event streaming should standardize on AWS Managed Streaming for Kafka (MSK) or Confluent Cloud Enterprise across all 6 divisions (Owner: Elena Rostova).
Next steps
- David O'Reilly convenes the inaugural meeting of the reconstituted Enterprise Architecture Review Board.
- Cloud Platform team deploys automated AWS Organizations Service Control Policies (SCPs) blocking unapproved database creation.
- Initiate Phase 1 of the Technical Debt Retirement roadmap, consolidating 14 legacy customer databases into the centralized Aurora cluster.
skill: enterprise-architect
Global Banking Enterprise Architecture — Fitness Self-Check [ENTARCH-BANK-FIT-001]
Summary
This fitness self-check evaluates the enterprise architecture framework against three critical red-capable domain failure probes: anemic model, cross-context transaction, and duplicate language. All targeted probes pass by design construction. A self-check is supporting evidence, never the authoritative gate. Where an executable gate exists, it decides and this document records what it said.
Detailed Description
| Criterion [FIT-n] | Probe | Evidence | Result | Limits of the claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIT-1: Anemic Model | Seed a project proposal where a divisional team requests $1.2M to build a standalone customer portal using an unapproved Couchbase database without linking to any BDAT domain models. | ARB automated intake scanner probe_unapproved_technology_rejection verifying rejection with diagnostic ERR_TECHNOLOGY_NOT_IN_ENTERPRISE_RADAR. | pass | Confirms ARB automated intake checks; does not evaluate offline software installed on local developer laptops. |
| FIT-2: Cross-Context Transaction | Seed an architecture design where an un-vetted analytics pipeline attempts to establish direct database links to the core retail banking ledger, bypassing enterprise API gateways. | Enterprise network perimeter linter probe_cross_domain_direct_db_link verifying build failure with diagnostic ERR_CROSS_DOMAIN_UNMEDIATED_DATABASE_ACCESS. | pass | Confirms network security infrastructure rules; does not inspect ad-hoc manual DBA terminal connections. |
| FIT-3: Duplicate Language | Seed an application proposal that redefines core enterprise entities (CustomerParty, AccountBalance) inconsistently with the Enterprise Common Information Model (CIM). | Enterprise data dictionary validator probe_data_model_vocabulary_drift verifying schema rejection with diagnostic ERR_ENTERPRISE_VOCABULARY_DRIFT_DETECTED. | pass | Confirms automated schema registry validation; does not inspect informal PowerPoint presentations. |
Residual Risk
- Temporary resistance from regional engineering teams during the consolidation of redundant database technologies. Accepted by Elena Rostova with migration enablement workshops and training allowances.
Traceability
| Claim | Classification | Source | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rejection of unapproved technology radar items | derived | FIT-1 probe result | 2026-09-15 |
| Rejection of unmediated cross-domain database links | derived | FIT-2 probe result | 2026-09-15 |
| Rejection of enterprise vocabulary drift | derived | FIT-3 probe result | 2026-09-15 |
Verification
No validator was supplied, so no command was run.
Open Decisions
None.
Next steps
- Architecture Guild incorporates enterprise fitness probes into automated pull request checks for all 340 application repositories.
- Enterprise Security team configures Prisma Cloud to continuously audit multi-account AWS compliance against the Technology Radar.
- Conduct quarterly enterprise architecture reviews tracking progress toward the $45M technical debt reduction milestone.
enterprise-architecture-framework-and-bd.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
What you get
About this skill
What it does
This skill maintains a decision-grade view of the enterprise architecture landscape and the governed path from current to target state. It aligns accepted business outcomes and capability priorities with domain-owned business, data, application, security, technology, and delivery contracts without taking over those domains.
Use it when
- Establish or update an enterprise baseline, target, and transition landscape
- Align capability/outcome priorities to data, application, technology, and security change
- Define enterprise principles, standards, exceptions, lifecycle states, and decision rights
- Rationalize overlapping portfolios or manage technology obsolescence and convergence
- Consolidate domain roadmaps into dependency-aware transition plateaus
- Assess enterprise-wide impact of acquisitions, regulation, platform strategy, or major transformation
For example: “We have four teams building their own service catalogue, two of them on different clouds, and every architecture review turns into the same argument about which one is standard.”
What you get
- architecture/enterprise-architect/README.md
- architecture/enterprise-architect/00-overview/enterprise-architect-overview.md
- architecture/enterprise-architect/verification/fitness-self-check.md
Plus one page per business module, only where your evidence calls for it: {module}/aggregates.md, {module}/domain-events.md, {module}/invariants.md, {module}/policies.md.
All paths are relative to the output folder you choose.
What it will not do
Do not use for one solution, one domain design, diagram generation, framework tutoring, or technology selection in isolation.
How it works
- Check the question spans more than one solution.
- Establish the current landscape from evidence, not from the wiki.
- State the target as a set of decisions, not a picture.
- Sequence by dependency and by capacity.
- Define the standard and its exception path together.
- Write the deliverable, classify every claim by its evidence, and check it before calling the work done.
What's in the package
Instruction-only: no scripts, no network calls, no environment variables.
- LICENSE.txt
- SKILL.md
- agents/openai.yaml
- assets/output-template-artifact.md
- assets/output-template-contract.md
- assets/output-template-decision.md
- assets/output-template-domain.md
- assets/output-template-fitness.md
- assets/output-template-mechanism.md
- references/domain-rules.md
- references/operating-rules.md
- references/output-contract.md
How to install
Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.
- 1
Download the ZIP
Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.
- 2
Unzip into your skills folder
Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.
- 3
Ask your agent to use it
Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.
Skills folder by agent
Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 12 days ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install